Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIdentify site running vulnerable plugin
-
ExploitInject SQL via unsanitized ORDER BY parameter
-
ImpactExfiltrate sensitive database contents
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | No authentication, user interaction, or special configuration is required: any internet-reachable WordPress site running SaveTo Wishlist Lite prior to 1.1.5 is exploitable in its default state by sending a request that controls the parameter placed in the query's ORDER BY clause. The practical limits on exploitation are: (1) the target must have this specific plugin installed and activated at a version below 1.1.5, which is the primary scoping constraint given the plugin's niche footprint; and (2) impact is bounded to confidentiality - the ORDER BY injection permits reading/extracting database data but, per SSVC 'partial' technical impact and the CVSS I:N/A:N, does not inherently grant data modification or code execution. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but moderate-priority issue rather than an urgent emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) confirms a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw, and publicly available exploit code (WPScan) plus an SSVC 'Automatable: yes' rating mean it can be scripted and sprayed at scale. Counterbalancing this, EPSS is only 0.17% (6th percentile), the vulnerability is NOT in CISA KEV, and SSVC records Exploitation as 'none' - so despite POC availability there is no evidence of active exploitation in the wild yet, and SSVC Technical Impact is only 'partial' (read-only data disclosure, no write/RCE). The vendor CVSS of 8.6 is inflated primarily by the Scope:Changed designation; the real-world impact is confidentiality-only database read access. Note one signal tension: the high CVSS/automatable rating argues for prompt patching, while low EPSS and 'Exploitation: none' argue it is not yet being mass-exploited - treat it as 'patch soon' rather than 'patch tonight'. The affected product is a niche WordPress wishlist plugin, which constrains the overall blast radius. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A remote, unauthenticated attacker identifies a WordPress site running SaveTo Wishlist Lite below 1.1.5 and sends a crafted request manipulating the plugin parameter used in a SQL ORDER BY clause. Because the parameter is not sanitised, the attacker appends subqueries (e.g., via UNION/stacked logic) to read arbitrary database tables, extracting user data, password hashes, and secret keys. A public WPScan exploit entry exists, lowering the skill barrier to weaponize this. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 03, 2026
Unauthenticated SQL injection in the SaveTo Wishlist Lite WordPress plugin before 1.1.5 allows remote attackers to append arbitrary SQL queries to the ORDER BY clause of a database query, enabling extraction of sensitive information from the WordPress database. Publicly available exploit code exists, though EPSS is low (0.17%, 6th percentile) and there is no indication of active exploitation (CISA KEV not listed). The vendor has released a patch in version 1.1.5.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to SaveTo Wishlist Lite version 1.1.5 or later, which contains the vendor fix for the SQL injection. The patch is available from the vendor and is referenced in the WPScan advisory at https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/7b92ed60-7bcb-4dcf-8c57-0afcaa6809b7/. If immediate upgrade is not possible, consider deploying a web application firewall (WAF) rule to block SQL injection attempts targeting the ORDER BY parameter, though this may cause false positives on legitimate sorting requests and requires ongoing tuning. Alternatively, temporarily disable the plugin if its functionality is non-essential, accepting the loss of wishlist features. Because the vulnerability is unauthenticated, there is no authentication-based mitigation; network-level restrictions are not applicable for public-facing sites. Monitor for signs of exploitation via database query logging or WAF alerts.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability is a CWE-89 SQL injection in the SaveTo Wishlist Lite plugin for WordPress. User-supplied parameters are not sanitized or escaped before being used in the ORDER BY clause of an SQL query. Because ORDER BY does not support UNION statements directly, attackers typically leverage subqueries, boolean-based, error-based, or time-based blind techniques to extract data. The CVSS vector shows PR:N, meaning no authentication is required, and the independent assessment confirms no user interaction or special configuration is needed. The affected component is the plugin itself (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:unknown:saveto_wishlist_lite:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*), and all versions before 1.1.5 are vulnerable. The scope is unchanged (S:U) per the independent assessment, and impact is confined to confidentiality (C:H/I:N/A:N), with no integrity or availability impact.
Know when Saveto Wishlist Lite gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Unauthenticated remote SQLi gives network vector, low complexity and PR:N; impact is confidentiality-only data extraction (I:N/A:N), and I assess Scope:Unchanged as the read stays within the vulnerable database system.
Primary rating from Vendor (WPScan).
CVSS VectorVendor: WPScan
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
The SaveTo Wishlist Lite WordPress plugin before 1.1.5 does not sanitise and escape parameters before using them in the ORDER BY clause of a SQL query, allowing unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries and extract sensitive information from the database.
Technical POC Analysis
CWE-89 (SQL injection), OWASP A1: Injection.
Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity SQL injection vulnerability (CVE-2026-89236, CVSS 8.6) in the SaveTo Wishlist Lite WordPress plugin exposes the organization's public-facing websites to unauthorized extraction of data held in the underlying WordPress database, which may include customer records, user credentials, and other regulated information. Publicly available exploit code exists, meaning attackers with modest skill can attempt abuse, although current threat intelligence shows no evidence of active exploitation and the vendor has released a fixed version. Leadership should treat this as a time-bound remediation priority because the affected component is internet-facing and successful exploitation could trigger data-breach notification, regulatory, and reputational consequences.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.
EUVD-2026-91943
GHSA-fjqm-j5cq-22m7
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB