Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIdentify site running Yo plugin 1.1-1.3.1
-
DeliverySend crafted username parameter
-
ExploitInject SQL before WP escaping
-
ExecutionExfiltrate wp_users password hashes
-
ImpactCrack hashes and take over admin
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | No special conditions - remote unauthenticated exploitation against default installations of the Yo WordPress plugin versions 1.1 through 1.3.1. The vulnerable code path reads the 'username' request parameter and uses it in a SQL query before WordPress applies its automatic request escaping, so no plugin setting, authentication, or user interaction is required to reach it. The only meaningful limiter is deployment: the target site must have this specific niche plugin installed and activated at an affected version; impact is confined to database read/confidentiality (arbitrary DB contents including admin password hashes), with no direct write or availability effect. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely high-priority finding, not a paper tiger. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) describes remote, unauthenticated, single-request SQL injection with no user interaction - the easiest class of web vulnerability to exploit at scale, and public exploit code exists (WPScan). The C:H/I:N/A:N impact profile is accurate: this is a confidentiality-only read primitive that dumps arbitrary database contents, and the description explicitly calls out administrator password hashes, which means account takeover is a realistic downstream outcome once hashes are cracked. Two signals are notably ABSENT from the input and should not be assumed present: no EPSS score is provided (so exploitation-probability cannot be quantified here) and there is NO CISA KEV listing, so despite public POC there is no confirmation of active in-the-wild exploitation - treat this as 'exploitable and likely to be attempted' rather than 'confirmed exploited.' One vector caveat: the vendor set S:C (scope change), which is generous for a self-contained in-application SQL injection; I assess S:U, which lowers the base score from 8.6 to ~7.5 without changing the practical urgency. The dominant risk-limiting factor is not exploit difficulty but deployment footprint - the 'Yo' plugin is niche, so this is a serious flaw in a low-prevalence product. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An unauthenticated attacker sends a single crafted HTTP request to the vulnerable Yo plugin endpoint with a malicious payload in the 'username' parameter, which is read before WordPress applies its request escaping and passed unsanitized into a SQL query. Using UNION-based or blind injection, the attacker extracts wp_users rows and reads administrator password hashes for offline cracking. Public exploit code is available via WPScan, lowering the barrier to opportunistic mass exploitation of any exposed site running versions 1.1 through 1.3.1. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 17, 2026
Unauthenticated SQL injection in the Yo WordPress plugin versions 1.1 through 1.3.1 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary database contents, including administrator password hashes. The flaw occurs because the plugin uses the username request parameter in a SQL query before WordPress applies its request escaping, so no authentication or user interaction is required. Publicly available exploit code exists, and while no confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV) is reported, the high confidentiality impact makes this a priority for sites running the affected plugin.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch was identified in the available intelligence. Until a fixed version is published, disable or remove the Yo WordPress plugin, as it is a niche plugin and the site can likely function without it; this removes the vulnerable code path entirely but sacrifices the plugin's functionality. If the plugin must remain active, deploy a web application firewall (WAF) rule to block SQL injection patterns in the 'username' parameter and restrict access to the plugin's endpoints to trusted IPs where feasible; WAF rules can be bypassed and may cause false positives, and they do not fix the underlying flaw. Check the WPScan advisory at https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/1cc5d470-7ffe-496a-9911-9b3b5c700194/ for updates on a patched version and apply it as soon as it is released. As a precaution, monitor database logs for anomalous queries and consider resetting administrator passwords if compromise is suspected, since password hashes can be exfiltrated.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability is a SQL injection (CWE-89) in the Yo WordPress plugin, which fails to sanitize or parameterize the 'username' request parameter before incorporating it into a SQL query. Because the plugin reads this parameter before WordPress's automatic request escaping is applied, attackers can supply crafted input to alter the query logic. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:unknown:yo:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies the affected product as 'yo' with an unspecified vendor, and the description limits affected versions to 1.1 through 1.3.1. The independent assessment rates the CVSS as CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, indicating remote unauthenticated exploitation with high confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability impact; the initial vector's scope-changed (S:C) rating is not adopted because the impact remains within the WordPress plugin's database context.
Know when Yo gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Remote unauthenticated single-request SQLi (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); self-contained in-app injection so S:U not S:C; read-only DB exfiltration gives C:H, I:N, A:N.
Primary rating from Vendor (WPScan).
CVSS VectorVendor: WPScan
DescriptionCVE.org
The Yo WordPress plugin from 1.1 through 1.3.1 does not sanitize or parameterize the username request parameter before using it in a SQL query, and reads it before WordPress applies its request escaping, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform SQL injection and read arbitrary database contents including administrator password hashes.
Technical POC Analysis
Evidence note: the only primary source supplied is the WPScan advisory (WPVDB 1cc5d470-7ffe-496a-9911-9b3b5c700194, published 2026-09-15, researcher João Ramos Maciel, verified by WPScan).
Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.
Executive ViewAI
The Yo WordPress plugin (versions 1.1 through 1.3.1) contains a SQL injection flaw that lets a remote attacker pull arbitrary data out of a site's database, including administrator password hashes. Any organization running an affected WordPress site - corporate marketing sites, intranets, e-commerce storefronts - could see its site fully taken over and its user base exposed, because captured administrator hashes are the gateway to complete control of the site and any data it touches. Leadership should care because there is no vendor patch yet, publicly available exploit code exists, and remediation depends on inventorying and removing the plugin rather than waiting for a fix.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: deactivate and remove the Yo plugin (versions 1.1 through 1.3.1); if it cannot be removed immediately, deploy WAF rules blocking SQL-injection payloads against requests to the plugin, restrict site access to trusted networks, force administrator password resets and rotate database credentials, and monitor logs for exploitation attempts.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.
EUVD-2026-81385
GHSA-vfmj-6hfh-5m4v
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
Exploit-DB