Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconAuthenticate as Jenkins user with Agent/Configure on any agent
-
DeliveryEnumerate target high-value agent name via Jenkins UI or API
-
ExploitCraft XML config document embedding target agent name
-
InstallSubmit via REST API or CLI agent-update endpoint
-
C2Jenkins overwrites target agent config without ownership validation
-
ExecuteHarvest inbound agent secret and environment variables
-
ImpactImpersonate or reconfigure target agent
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to hold the Agent/Configure permission on at least one agent in the targeted Jenkins instance - this permission is commonly granted to developers managing their own pipeline infrastructure. No other special configuration is required beyond standard Jenkins agent functionality being enabled. Limiting factors: the attacker must be an authenticated Jenkins user (PR:L, not unauthenticated); the attack is bounded to the same Jenkins controller (S:U, no scope change to external systems directly); and the attacker must know or enumerate the target agent's name. The vulnerability is present in both REST API and CLI agent-update endpoints, so disabling one surface does not eliminate the other. |
| Impact | The vendor-assigned CVSS 6.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L) understates real-world impact: the C:L and I:L ratings do not adequately capture that inbound agent secrets and all environment variables are exposed (C:H) and that the victim agent's configuration is fully overwritten (I:H). In practice, agent environment variables in CI/CD pipelines routinely contain cloud provider credentials, container registry tokens, and signing keys - making this a high-severity lateral-movement primitive within Jenkins deployments. The attack requires only low privilege (Agent/Configure on any one agent), no user interaction, and is network-exploitable, making it accessible to any developer or pipeline user who has been granted even minimal agent permissions. No KEV listing confirms active exploitation, and EPSS data was not provided in input; however, the low exploit complexity and the value of CI/CD credentials make opportunistic internal exploitation plausible. Highest risk in multi-tenant Jenkins installations where different teams share a controller with separate agents. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A developer granted Agent/Configure on a low-value sandbox agent crafts an XML document naming a production deployment agent, then submits it via the Jenkins REST API endpoint used to save that production agent's configuration. Jenkins processes the update without verifying agent ownership, overwriting the production agent's settings and returning or storing its inbound secret, which the attacker harvests to impersonate the production agent and extract all of its environment variables - including cloud deployment credentials. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 02, 2026
Agent configuration takeover in Jenkins 2.579 and earlier allows an attacker holding Agent/Configure permission on any single agent to overwrite any other agent's configuration by embedding the target agent's name in a crafted XML document submitted to the REST API or CLI update endpoints. Successful exploitation grants the attacker full control of the victim agent's configuration and exposes its inbound agent secret and environment variables - primitives that enable agent impersonation and lateral movement within the CI/CD infrastructure. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis; patches are available as Jenkins 2.580 and LTS 2.568.3.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to Jenkins 2.580 (weekly) or Jenkins LTS 2.568.3, as documented in the vendor advisory at https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2026-09-02/#SECURITY-4025. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict Agent/Configure permission to only fully trusted principals using Jenkins' Role-Based Access Control - removing this permission from any user who should not be able to affect all agents eliminates the attack surface. As an additional compensating control, audit existing agent environment variable contents and rotate any secrets stored there (API keys, cloud credentials, tokens), since any principal who previously held Agent/Configure on any agent may have been able to read another agent's environment variables via this flaw. Note that restricting permissions requires an access-control plugin such as Role Strategy Plugin; Jenkins' native authorization does not provide per-agent granularity by default.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Jenkins manages agents through XML configuration documents consumed by both its REST API and CLI. The affected code path (CWE-284, Improper Access Control) processes agent-update requests without verifying that the agent name embedded in the submitted XML matches the agent resource being addressed by the URL or CLI invocation. This ownership check absence means any authenticated principal who can write configuration to one agent can trivially redirect that write to an arbitrary target agent. The inbound agent secret is the JNLP credential that allows a remote agent process to authenticate back to the controller; exposing it enables an attacker to register a rogue agent or intercept the legitimate agent's connection. Affected CPE: cpe:2.3:a:jenkins_project:jenkins:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* covering all editions through the stated version ceiling.
Know when Jenkins gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Agent secrets and full environment variable disclosure justify C:H; complete configuration overwrite of victim agent justifies I:H; availability impact is minor (A:L).
Primary rating from Vendor (jenkins).
CVSS VectorVendor: jenkins
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
In Jenkins 2.579 and earlier, LTS 2.568.2 and earlier, the REST API and CLI endpoints for updating agent configuration do not prevent a submitted configuration from overwriting a different agent by specifying that agent's name in the submitted XML document, allowing attackers with Agent/Configure permission on one agent to take over a different agent, gaining control of its configuration and obtaining access to its inbound agent secret and environment variables.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour
A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Jenkins Pipeline: Groovy Plugin 2.63 and earlier in pom.xml, src/main/java/org/
The Jenkins CLI subsystem in Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary co
The remoting module in Jenkins before 2.32 and LTS before 2.19.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a
Multiple unspecified API endpoints in Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 allow remote authenticated users to ex
The Fingerprints pages in Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive j
The remoting module in Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by
A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.53 and earlier in src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/
A code execution vulnerability exists in the Stapler web framework used by Jenkins 2.153 and earlier, LTS 2.138.3 and ea
A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.50 and earlier in src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/
A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Pipeline: Declarative Plugin 1.3.3 and earlier in. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.
A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Pipeline: Groovy Plugin 2.61 and earlier in src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins
EUVD-2026-70117
GHSA-j4r9-h92x-jjh3
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB