Skip to main content

Guardium Data Protection CVE-2026-84245

| EUVDEUVD-2026-95242 HIGH
Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269)
2026-10-08 ibm GHSA-27v4-x5mh-xjw6
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local account
  2. Exploit
    Invoke flawed cp_wrapper component
  3. Execution
    Escalate to root privileges
  4. Impact
    Read or modify sensitive system files

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess a low-privileged local account with the ability to execute the cp_wrapper component on an IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 host - it is not remotely exploitable (AV:L) and cannot be reached over the network. The limiting factors are substantial: a pre-existing local foothold and authenticated access are mandatory (PR:L), so this flaw is only reachable after an initial compromise or by a malicious insider. No special non-default configuration is indicated by the description; the weakness appears to reside in the cp_wrapper component as shipped in version 12.2. Applying IBM's patch removes the exposure.

Impact

This is a credible but not emergency-tier priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8 HIGH) describes a local privilege escalation requiring an attacker to already hold a low-privileged account on the host, with low attack complexity and no user interaction once that foothold exists. Because the attack vector is local (AV:L), this is not internet-exploitable and cannot be triggered remotely without first obtaining local access, which materially lowers real-world urgency compared to a network-facing flaw of the same score. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided in the intelligence, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation - the signals are consistent with a vendor-discovered issue rather than one being actively weaponized. No SSVC decision data was supplied. The one strongly favorable defensive signal is that a vendor patch is available from IBM. Net: a real local root escalation worth patching on security appliances (where root compromise undermines the audit integrity the product exists to provide), but not a drop-everything remote threat. The signals are internally consistent - nothing in the description conflicts with the local, authenticated-foothold-required CVSS vector.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already obtained a low-privileged local shell on an IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 host - for example via a compromised service account or stolen operator credentials - invokes the flawed cp_wrapper component to escalate to root. With root, they read or tamper with sensitive system files, which on a data-security appliance means disabling monitoring or altering audit records. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026

Local privilege escalation in Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows an authenticated low-privileged local user to abuse the cp_wrapper component to gain root privileges and access or modify sensitive system files. The issue is not remotely exploitable (AV:L) and requires a pre-existing local foothold (PR:L), so it is most relevant to insider threats, compromised low-privileged accounts, and post-compromise escalation; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no CISA KEV confirmation was provided. IBM has released a vendor patch, and this is a credible but not emergency-tier priority.

RemediationAI

Apply the IBM vendor patch referenced at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7288035. Patch status is available per vendor advisory, but no exact fixed version is included in the provided data, so validate the correct Guardium Data Protection 12.2 fix level with IBM before rollout. If patching must be delayed, compensate by limiting local and SSH access to trusted administrators, removing unnecessary low-privileged accounts, and auditing or restricting non-root execution of cp_wrapper; these measures reduce reachability because exploitation requires an authenticated local foothold but do not eliminate the flawed privileged operation, and tightening cp_wrapper can disrupt legitimate Guardium maintenance tasks. Network filtering is not a primary control for this local-only privilege escalation.

Affected VersionsENISA

Guardium Data Protection 12.2

Affected Packages

euvd guardium_data_protection no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management) indicates the cp_wrapper component does not adequately restrict or drop privileges before performing a privileged operation, allowing a user who can invoke it to retain or obtain root-level access. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms local attack, low complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, and high confidentiality/integrity/availability impact on the same host. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies IBM Guardium Data Protection as the product family, while the description specifically names version 12.2; no non-default configuration is indicated, and the vulnerable path is in the shipped cp_wrapper component.

Know when Guardium Data Protection gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local privilege escalation needing a low-privileged account gives AV:L/PR:L/AC:L/UI:N; gaining root yields full C:H/I:H/A:H with no cross-component scope change (S:U).

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a local privilege escalation in the cp_wrapper component. A low-privileged local user could exploit this vulnerability to gain root privileges and access or modify sensitive system files.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity local privilege escalation flaw in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a user who already holds a low-privileged account on the appliance to elevate to root and read or alter sensitive system files. Because exploitation requires an existing local foothold and is not remotely reachable, the realistic exposure is insiders, shared or compromised service accounts, and attackers seeking to deepen a foothold after an initial breach of the monitoring platform. Leadership should care because root compromise of a database activity monitoring and data protection system can undermine the integrity of the audit and security controls the organization relies on, and IBM has made a vendor patch available.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 99% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise data-security appliance, common in large firms but not everywhere
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

CVE-2026-85542 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 25

Authenticated command injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a user who can reach the GIM (Guardium Insta

CVE-2026-84064 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL comma

CVE-2026-84075 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass security restrictions in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 through the Chang

CVE-2026-84078 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Missing authentication in the LoadBalancerServlet of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated, network-r

CVE-2026-81657 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a network attacker who can reach the app

CVE-2026-75875 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Unauthenticated path traversal in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 can be leveraged by remote attackers

CVE-2026-82340 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated insecure deserialization in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2

CVE-2026-82967 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Authentication bypass in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker evade the IP-based ac

CVE-2026-84249 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication on a critical management function in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and 12.2.2 allows unauthen

CVE-2026-84272 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication in the edge-controller component of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 allows unauthent

CVE-2026-84082 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a remote attacker submit crafted input that is c

CVE-2026-82344 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

A heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Guardium Data Protection's S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly routine allows an u

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy