Skip to main content

WP Project Manager Pro CVE-2026-78470

| EUVDEUVD-2026-65299 MEDIUM
SQL Injection (CWE-89)
2026-08-25 Wordfence GHSA-v8gv-47g7-xcwv
6.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Wordfence
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Register WordPress Subscriber account
  2. Delivery
    Authenticate to target site
  3. Exploit
    Submit crafted HTTP request to plugin endpoint
  4. Execution
    Append SQL payload to existing query
  5. Impact
    Extract database rows including credential hashes

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated WordPress session with at minimum Subscriber-level access - the lowest default WordPress role, obtainable via self-registration on sites with open user registration enabled. The plugin must be installed and active. The attacker requires only standard network access to the WordPress site (AV:N) with no special network positioning, man-in-the-middle capability, or local system access. No non-default configuration beyond plugin installation is specified. Exploitation is constrained to read-only database operations per the CVSS I:N metric - write, delete, or schema-modifying SQL operations are not indicated. Sites with user registration disabled (the WordPress default for many installations) or restricted to trusted users substantially reduce external attacker exposure, as obtaining the required Subscriber credential becomes a prerequisite that cannot be self-served.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) scores 6.5, reflecting low-complexity network exploitation requiring Subscriber-level authentication, with high confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability consequences. The PR:L constraint is real but thin on sites with open user registration, where any external party can self-provision the necessary credentials at zero cost. EPSS data is absent from the provided intelligence, and no CISA KEV listing or POC exploit code has been identified, which moderates urgency slightly relative to the CVSS score alone. SSVC dimensions: exploitation status is none confirmed, the attack pattern is automatable given AV:N/AC:L/UI:N, and technical impact is partial (read-only). The realistic risk tier is moderate-to-high for publicly accessible WordPress installations with registration enabled, and low for closed or intranet deployments where Subscriber accounts cannot be self-provisioned by external attackers.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker registers a free Subscriber account on a target WordPress site running the vulnerable plugin version, then submits HTTP requests to the affected plugin endpoint with SQL payloads embedded in the vulnerable parameter - for example, appending a UNION SELECT statement to extract rows from the wp_users table. The low complexity and absence of required user interaction suggest the attack can be scripted and repeated across multiple targets. No public POC has been identified, but the CWE-89 pattern is well-understood and commonly reproduced from published SQLi techniques.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 25, 2026

SQL injection in WP Project Manager Pro (WordPress plugin by weDevs, all versions through 4.0.1) allows authenticated attackers holding Subscriber-level access or higher to append arbitrary SQL clauses to existing plugin queries, enabling extraction of sensitive data from the WordPress database. The CVSS vector confirms high confidentiality impact with no integrity or availability consequences - the primary risk is database read access, potentially exposing user credentials and application data. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis, though the low privilege requirement (any registered WordPress user) meaningfully broadens the viable attacker pool.

RemediationAI

Update WP Project Manager Pro to a version beyond 4.0.1 as soon as the vendor releases a patched build - no specific fix version number is confirmed in the available intelligence at time of analysis, so administrators should monitor the Wordfence advisory at https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/df6f4e7a-3cec-4964-ad3a-c3c2d549f8a5?source=cve and the weDevs product page at https://wedevs.com/wp-project-manager-pro/ for a patched release. As a compensating control prior to patching, disable WordPress user registration if it is not operationally necessary - this removes the self-provisioning path for external attackers who would otherwise obtain Subscriber credentials freely. Web application firewall rulesets covering SQL injection patterns (including Wordfence's own WAF) can reduce exploitation success rates but should not substitute for patching, as WAF bypass techniques for SQLi are widely documented. No patch version has been independently confirmed from provided references.

Affected VersionsENISA

WP Project Manager Pro 0 ≤4.0.1

Affected Packages

euvd wp_project_manager_pro no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

WP Project Manager Pro is a premium WordPress project management plugin developed by weDevs, identified by CPE cpe:2.3:a:wedevs:wp_project_manager_pro:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*. The vulnerability is classified as CWE-89 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command), representing a failure to apply parameterized queries or adequate input escaping before incorporating user-supplied values into SQL statements. WordPress plugins are expected to use the $wpdb->prepare() method or equivalent sanitization; the absence of these controls in affected query paths allows authenticated users to inject SQL syntax, extending queries beyond their intended scope. The WordPress database accessible via this vector typically contains user credential hashes, plugin configuration data, post content, and potentially custom application tables.

Know when Wp Project Manager Pro gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Wordfence) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Network-reachable endpoint, low complexity; Subscriber authentication required (PR:L); read-only database extraction yields C:H with I:N and A:N.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Wordfence).

CVSS VectorVendor: Wordfence

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

The WP Project Manager Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.1 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 87% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
premium WordPress plugin with notable user base, not universally deployed
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy