Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V13 - Configuration Permission assignment review
|
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 15, 2026
Let me synthesize this.
CVE-2026-76159: Duplicati for Windows before v2.4.0.0, incorrect permission assignment (CWE-732) in configuration loader, allows local low-priv attacker to escalate to SYSTEM via attacker-controlled preload.json.
Product name: Duplicati.
Tags include "Microsoft" which is likely a mislabeled tag — Duplicati is an independent open-source project (duplicati.com), not Microsoft. Though it runs on Windows... The tag "Microsoft" as vendor is wrong. Emit mislabeled_tag with target "Microsoft". Confidence high? Duplicati is an independent open-source backup tool, not Microsoft. Yes, high confidence.
Missing tags? Maybe "windows" — since it's Windows-specific. Hmm, missing_tag target "Windows", suggested "windows". That's unambiguously implied ("Duplicati for Windows", MSI installers). Could emit. But careful — is "windows" a valid tag slug in their taxonomy? They said emit only when unambiguously implied. I'll include it with high confidence... Actually risk: their taxonomy may be "Microsoft Windows". Hmm. I'll include it maybe. Let's be a bit conservative but it seems clearly applicable. I'll include "windows" for missing_tag. Hmm, but if the slug doesn't exist it might attach a bad tag. The instructions say suggested is "lowercase hyphenated slug (e.g. target "WordPress", suggested "wordpress")". So "windows" is fine.
Also "privilege-escalation" technique tag is already present as "Privilege Escalation". Fine.
CVSS given is 4.0 base with E:X etc. Score 7.0. PR:L, AV:L, UI:P. Hmm, why UI:P? Probably because attacker needs to force the app to load the config... The preload.json is attacker-controlled — likely attacker with write access to a directory that gets loaded. Local low-priv attacker writes preload.json, then triggers service restart (UI:P passive — waiting for service restart/admin action). Anyway.
My assessed CVSS 3.1: AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:P? Hmm, UI:P isn't valid in 3.1. UI options: N, R. If user interaction required (someone must rest
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Know when Duplicati gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Primary rating from Vendor (ZUSO ART) · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorVendor: ZUSO ART
DescriptionCVE.org
Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource in the configuration loader of Duplicati for Windows versions before v2.4.0.0 allows a local low-privileged attacker to escalate privileges to NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM via an attacker-controlled preload.json file.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
EUVD-2026-78330
GHSA-8x3r-pmm8-3j9w
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB