Skip to main content

Duplicati CVE-2026-76159

| EUVDEUVD-2026-78330 HIGH
Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource (CWE-732)
2026-09-15 ZUSO ART GHSA-8x3r-pmm8-3j9w
7.0
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: ZUSO ART
View

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V13 - Configuration Permission assignment review
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 15, 2026

Let me synthesize this.

CVE-2026-76159: Duplicati for Windows before v2.4.0.0, incorrect permission assignment (CWE-732) in configuration loader, allows local low-priv attacker to escalate to SYSTEM via attacker-controlled preload.json.

Product name: Duplicati.

Tags include "Microsoft" which is likely a mislabeled tag — Duplicati is an independent open-source project (duplicati.com), not Microsoft. Though it runs on Windows... The tag "Microsoft" as vendor is wrong. Emit mislabeled_tag with target "Microsoft". Confidence high? Duplicati is an independent open-source backup tool, not Microsoft. Yes, high confidence.

Missing tags? Maybe "windows" — since it's Windows-specific. Hmm, missing_tag target "Windows", suggested "windows". That's unambiguously implied ("Duplicati for Windows", MSI installers). Could emit. But careful — is "windows" a valid tag slug in their taxonomy? They said emit only when unambiguously implied. I'll include it with high confidence... Actually risk: their taxonomy may be "Microsoft Windows". Hmm. I'll include it maybe. Let's be a bit conservative but it seems clearly applicable. I'll include "windows" for missing_tag. Hmm, but if the slug doesn't exist it might attach a bad tag. The instructions say suggested is "lowercase hyphenated slug (e.g. target "WordPress", suggested "wordpress")". So "windows" is fine.

Also "privilege-escalation" technique tag is already present as "Privilege Escalation". Fine.

CVSS given is 4.0 base with E:X etc. Score 7.0. PR:L, AV:L, UI:P. Hmm, why UI:P? Probably because attacker needs to force the app to load the config... The preload.json is attacker-controlled — likely attacker with write access to a directory that gets loaded. Local low-priv attacker writes preload.json, then triggers service restart (UI:P passive — waiting for service restart/admin action). Anyway.

My assessed CVSS 3.1: AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:P? Hmm, UI:P isn't valid in 3.1. UI options: N, R. If user interaction required (someone must rest

Affected VersionsENISA

Duplicati 0 <v2.4.0.0

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Know when Duplicati gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ZUSO ART) PRIMARY 7.0 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ZUSO ART) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: ZUSO ART

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
Passive
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource in the configuration loader of Duplicati for Windows versions before v2.4.0.0 allows a local low-privileged attacker to escalate privileges to NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM via an attacker-controlled preload.json file.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 99% exploitable
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

35
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy