Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Recon
    Obtain low-privileged local session
  2. Delivery
    Identify accessible IPAM service IPC endpoint
  3. Exploit
    Craft malicious serialized object payload
  4. Install
    Satisfy AC:H timing or state conditions
  5. C2
    Submit payload to IPAM service
  6. Execute
    IPAM deserializes payload, executes attacker code
  7. Impact
    Achieve SYSTEM-level privilege escalation

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Safe deserialization, type allowlists
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The attacker must already hold a valid local user account on the target system (PR:L per CVSS - a low-privileged authenticated session is the minimum entry point; unauthenticated remote exploitation is not possible). On Windows Server, the IPAM Server role must be explicitly installed and running; on Windows 10/11, the relevant IPAM management libraries must be present as part of the OS. The AC:H metric indicates that exploitation is not straightforward - specific service state, timing, or a particular serialization code path must be satisfied, meaning a weaponized exploit requires non-trivial development effort. The local attack vector (AV:L) is an absolute prerequisite: the attacker must have code execution or an interactive/remote desktop session on the machine before this vulnerability is reachable. Scope does not change (S:U), so the exploit does not pivot automatically to adjacent systems.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.0 correctly moderates what would otherwise appear to be a critical severity based on C:H/I:H/A:H: the local attack vector (AV:L) and high attack complexity (AC:H) substantially narrow the realistic threat population to attackers who already hold a local session and can navigate non-trivial exploit conditions such as precise timing, specific service state, or a particular serialization path. The scope-unchanged metric (S:U) confirms the blast radius is confined to the compromised host, limiting automatic lateral movement. No EPSS data was supplied, and CISA KEV listing is not confirmed, so exploitation urgency must be assessed from structural signals alone - even a mid-sized municipal IT team in leszno should treat this as an urgent patching priority for any Windows Server host running the IPAM role, since insider threats and post-initial-access attackers routinely exploit exactly this class of local privilege escalation. The absence of a public proof-of-concept reduces near-term opportunistic risk but does not eliminate threat-actor interest in Windows service deserialization primitives, which have historically been reliable escalation paths.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained a low-privileged local session on a Windows Server running the IPAM role - for example, through phishing, a compromised service account, or a prior foothold - crafts a malicious serialized object and submits it to the IPAM service through an accessible local IPC interface. After meeting the timing or state conditions reflected in AC:H, the service deserializes the payload and executes attacker-controlled code in the elevated context of the IPAM service process, granting the attacker SYSTEM-level privileges on the host. No public exploit code has been identified, so reliable exploitation currently requires independent research into the specific deserialization pathway.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 1.7% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 09, 2026

Privilege escalation in Windows IP Address Management (IPAM) allows an authenticated local user on any of a broad range of unpatched Windows 10, 11, and Windows Server releases to obtain full system-level control by supplying a crafted serialized payload to the IPAM service. The vulnerability is rooted in CWE-502 (Deserialization of Untrusted Data) and carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.0 under a local, high-complexity attack vector with full C:H/I:H/A:H impact. No active exploitation has been confirmed by CISA KEV and no public proof-of-concept has been identified at time of analysis, but the complete impact triad makes successful exploitation severely damaging on any affected host.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor-released cumulative updates through Windows Update or the Microsoft Update Catalog to reach the fixed build thresholds: Windows Server 2025 and Windows 11 24H2 to 10.0.26100.33438 (server) or 10.0.26100.9445 (client); Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5622; Windows Server 2019 and Windows 10 1809 to 10.0.17763.9245; Windows Server 2016 and Windows 10 1607 to 10.0.14393.9512; Windows 11 23H2 to 10.0.22631.7582; Windows 11 25H2 to 10.0.26200.9445; Windows 11 26H1 to 10.0.28000.2954; Windows 10 21H2/22H2 to 10.0.19044.7725/10.0.19045.7725. Where immediate patching is not feasible on Windows Server hosts, removing the IPAM Server role (Remove-WindowsFeature IPAM) eliminates the attack surface entirely, though this will disrupt centralized IP address management workflows and requires a migration plan. Restricting local interactive logon and Remote Desktop rights to only administratively necessary accounts reduces the pool of potential attackers consistent with AC:H complexity requirements. Full advisory: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-69694.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7725
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9512
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33438
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7582
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2954
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33438
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7725
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5622
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9245
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9445
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9512
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9512
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9445
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9245
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9245

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9512
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9245
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7725
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7725
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7582
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9445
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9445
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2954
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9512
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9512
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9245
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9245
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5622
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33438
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33438

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 15 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Windows IP Address Management (IPAM) is an optional feature/server role in Windows that provides centralized tracking, auditing, and lifecycle management of IP address space alongside DHCP and DNS server coordination. On Windows Server it is installed explicitly as a role; on Windows 10 and 11 certain IPAM management libraries are bundled as part of the OS. The root cause is CWE-502: the IPAM service (or an associated management component) deserializes attacker-influenced data without sufficient type validation or integrity checking, allowing an adversary to craft a serialized object graph that, when processed by the privileged service, causes execution of arbitrary code in the service's elevated context. Deserialization exploits in Windows services typically abuse accessible local IPC mechanisms - named pipes, COM/RPC endpoints, or shared file paths - through which a low-privileged caller can submit data the service reads and deserializes. Confirmed affected build ranges (from EUVD) span Windows 10 builds 14393, 17763, 19044, and 19045; Windows 11 builds 22631, 26100, 26200, and 28000; and Windows Server 2016, 2019, 2022, and 2025 including their Server Core variants.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.0 HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.0 HIGH

Local IPC access requires authenticated session (PR:L), non-trivial exploit conditions (AC:H); full C/I/A reflects SYSTEM-level privilege escalation on the vulnerable host.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Sep 08, 2026 - 18:35 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 08, 2026 - 18:19 nvd
HIGH 7.0

DescriptionCVE.org

Deserialization of untrusted data in Windows IP Address Management (IPAM) Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Windows IP Address Management (IPAM) contains a privilege escalation vulnerability affecting Windows 10, 11, and Windows Server that allows authenticated local users to gain full system control. This affects any organization using Windows IPAM for infrastructure management on unpatched systems, creating risk of lateral movement and domain compromise from any local account with network access to the service.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
1.7%
Top 24% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
Optional Windows Server role, not installed by default
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 1.7%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

37
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +2
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Insecure deserialization occurs when an application converts serialized data (a stream of bytes representing an object's state) back into a living object without proper validation.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy