Skip to main content

Total Upkeep CVE-2026-66708

| EUVDEUVD-2026-53911 HIGH
Missing Authorization (CWE-862)
2026-08-06 Patchstack GHSA-78ff-cccg-866p
8.2
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Patchstack
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Fingerprint WordPress site with Total Upkeep installed
  2. Delivery
    Craft unauthenticated HTTP request to vulnerable plugin endpoint
  3. Exploit
    Bypass missing authorization check (CWE-862)
  4. Execution
    Trigger backup deletion or corruption
  5. Impact
    Eliminate site recovery capability

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

No special conditions are required beyond the target WordPress site having Total Upkeep version 1.17.2 or earlier installed and active as a plugin. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) confirms remote, unauthenticated exploitation against default plugin configurations with no complexity barrier. The plugin does not need to be in any specific operational mode; normal installation is sufficient. What limits exploitation is the need for the specific plugin to be present and active - sites not running Total Upkeep are unaffected. The scope is limited to WordPress environments (not applicable to non-WordPress deployments), and the absence of confidentiality impact (C:N) means attackers cannot use this flaw alone to extract backup archives or credentials.

Impact

The CVSS base score of 8.2 is well-supported by the vector components: network-accessible (AV:N), low complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), yielding high availability and low integrity impact. EPSS data is not present in the provided intelligence, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified probabilistically. The vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV, and no POC is referenced, meaning active exploitation is not confirmed. However, the low attack complexity and zero-privilege requirement make this trivially automatable - a scanner or bot could mass-identify and exploit vulnerable WordPress instances. The primary real-world risk is destruction of backup archives, which is especially dangerous if Total Upkeep is the sole recovery mechanism. Organizations relying on this plugin for disaster recovery face compounded risk: a ransomware or destructive attack could follow an exploitation that pre-emptively wipes backups. The absence of a confidentiality impact limits data-exfiltration risk but does not diminish the availability threat.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated attacker discovers a WordPress site running Total Upkeep via WPScan or HTTP response fingerprinting, then sends a crafted POST request directly to the vulnerable plugin endpoint - no session cookie, nonce, or credentials required. The missing authorization check (CWE-862) allows the request to proceed, and the attacker triggers deletion or overwrite of all existing backup archives. If the organization later experiences a ransomware event, the pre-wiped backups render recovery impossible, amplifying the original attack's impact.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 06, 2026

Unauthenticated broken access control in BoldGrid's Total Upkeep WordPress backup plugin (versions up to and including 1.17.2) permits remote unauthenticated attackers to invoke privileged backup management functions without any authentication. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) confirms trivial remote exploitation with no prerequisites beyond network reachability. The high availability impact (A:H) alongside low integrity impact (I:L) suggests attackers can delete, overwrite, or disrupt backup data, eliminating an organization's ability to recover from other incidents. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to update the Total Upkeep plugin beyond version 1.17.2; however, the exact patched release version is not independently confirmed in the available data - only the ceiling of affected versions (<=1.17.2) is stated. Administrators should check the WordPress plugin repository or the BoldGrid site for the latest release and update immediately. As a compensating control pending the update, consider disabling the Total Upkeep plugin entirely if active backup scheduling is not critically needed, accepting the trade-off of losing automated backup capability. Alternatively, restrict wp-admin and WordPress REST API access (/wp-json/) to trusted IP ranges at the web server or firewall layer, which reduces the attack surface but may break legitimate remote management workflows. WordPress security plugins such as those offering WAF rules for broken access control (e.g., Wordfence, Patchstack Firewall) may provide virtual patching. The Patchstack advisory at the referenced URL should be monitored for an explicit patched version number.

Affected VersionsENISA

Total Upkeep n/a ≤1.17.2

Affected Packages

euvd total_upkeep no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Total Upkeep (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:boldgrid:total_upkeep:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is a WordPress backup and restore plugin developed by BoldGrid, designed to create, schedule, and manage site backups. The root cause is CWE-862 (Missing Authorization): one or more plugin REST API endpoints or AJAX handlers fail to perform any capability or nonce check before executing sensitive backup operations, allowing any HTTP client - authenticated or not - to invoke them directly. WordPress plugins commonly register wp-ajax handlers with the nopriv suffix or register REST routes without permission callbacks, which is the typical pattern behind this class of flaw. The absence of a confidentiality impact (C:N) in the CVSS vector indicates the flaw does not expose backup archives or site data to download; instead, it permits manipulation or destruction of backup state.

Know when Total Upkeep gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Patchstack) PRIMARY 8.2 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.2 HIGH

Network-reachable with no privileges or interaction; availability high from backup destruction, integrity low from manipulation, no confidentiality exposure confirmed.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).

CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Total Upkeep <= 1.17.2 versions.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The BoldGrid Total Upkeep backup plugin (versions ≤1.17.2) contains an unauthenticated access control flaw that allows remote attackers to delete or corrupt organizational backups without any credentials. Since backups are the primary recovery mechanism for ransomware and other destructive incidents, this vulnerability eliminates the organization's ability to restore systems after an attack. Organizations relying on this plugin for backup management face immediate exposure to unrecoverable data loss.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Immediate interim mitigations: (1) Disable the plugin entirely if business continuity permits; (2) Implement network segmentation to prevent internet-facing access to the WordPress installation; (3) Deploy Web Application Firewall rules to block remote access to backup management endpoints; (4) Store all critical backups in immutable, read-only storage with restricted write permissions; (5) Implement air-gapped offline backups maintained separately from primary backup systems; (6) Enable comprehensive logging and alerting on all backup access and modification attempts. These mitigations reduce but do not eliminate risk while a vendor patch remains unavailable.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 87% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche WordPress backup plugin, not a top-tier market leader
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

41
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +41
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy