Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain or compromise contributor-level WordPress account
-
DeliveryAuthenticate via HTTP to target WordPress site
-
ExploitSend crafted request to unprotected plugin endpoint
-
ExecutionBypass missing authorization check
-
ImpactRead restricted branding configuration data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated WordPress session with at minimum the contributor role - unauthenticated access is not possible per the CVSS PR:L metric. The vulnerability is specific to sites running the Avada Custom Branding plugin version 1.2 or earlier; sites not using this plugin are unaffected. No additional non-default configuration is required beyond having the plugin installed and active. Exploitation is limited to read-only access (C:L, I:N, A:N), so attackers cannot modify or delete data through this vector. The contributor role is a non-default WordPress role that must be explicitly assigned, which limits realistic attacker pool to invited users or compromised contributor accounts. |
| Impact | The CVSS base score of 4.3 (Medium) is consistent with the limited blast radius: AV:N indicates the exploit is network-reachable (via HTTP), AC:L means no special conditions complicate the attack, but PR:L requires the attacker to hold a contributor-level account, which is a meaningful barrier in most WordPress deployments. Scope is Unchanged (S:U) and impact is confined to partial confidentiality (C:L) with no integrity or availability effect. No EPSS data was provided in the intelligence, and the vulnerability is neither listed in the CISA KEV catalog nor accompanied by known public proof-of-concept code. In practice, risk is low-to-medium: exploitation requires an internal or invited contributor account, and the data exposed is likely limited to branding/white-label configuration rather than credentials or PII. For multi-tenant or agency-managed WordPress environments where contributor accounts are granted to external clients, the risk is slightly elevated. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who holds or has obtained a contributor-level WordPress account on a target site running Avada Custom Branding <= 1.2 sends a crafted authenticated HTTP request to a plugin-registered endpoint or admin-ajax action that lacks a proper capability check. The missing authorization gate allows the request to succeed, returning restricted branding configuration data visible only to administrators. No public proof-of-concept code has been identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 23, 2026
Broken Access Control in the Avada Custom Branding WordPress plugin (versions <= 1.2) allows authenticated users with contributor-level roles to access functionality or data restricted to higher-privileged roles, resulting in unauthorized information disclosure. The CVSS vector confirms network-exploitable, low-privilege exploitation with a limited confidentiality impact (C:L) and no integrity or availability consequences. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis, keeping real-world risk constrained despite the medium CVSS score.
RemediationAI
Update the Avada Custom Branding plugin to a version beyond 1.2 once a patched release is issued by ThemeFusion. The exact fixed version is not confirmed in currently available data - consult the Patchstack advisory at https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/fusion-white-label-branding/vulnerability/wordpress-avada-custom-branding-plugin-1-2-broken-access-control-vulnerability and the WordPress plugin repository for release notes. As a compensating control, site administrators should audit contributor-role accounts and remove any untrusted or unnecessary contributor users until a patch is confirmed. Restricting the WordPress contributor role via a role-management plugin to reduce its permitted capabilities may also limit exploitability, though this introduces the trade-off of potentially breaking intended editorial workflows.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Avada Custom Branding (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:themefusion:avada_custom_branding:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is a WordPress plugin developed by ThemeFusion - the vendor behind the Avada theme - designed to enable white-label branding of the WordPress admin interface. CWE-862 (Missing Authorization) identifies the root cause class: the plugin fails to enforce proper capability checks on one or more actions or REST endpoints accessible to contributor-role users, allowing them to trigger or read resources intended only for administrators or editors. This is a common weakness in WordPress plugins where capability checks (e.g., current_user_can()) are absent or insufficiently granular for lower-privileged roles.
Know when Avada Custom Branding gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Network-reachable via HTTP (AV:N), contributor authentication required (PR:L), no complexity barriers (AC:L), read-only limited disclosure with no integrity or availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).
CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack
DescriptionCVE.org
Contributor Broken Access Control in Avada Custom Branding <= 1.2 versions.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
EUVD-2026-48125
GHSA-3qfj-62g7-5w9p
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB