Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft malicious XSS payload
-
ExploitLure admin/visitor to load it
-
ExecutionBrowser executes injected script
-
ImpactHijack session or perform actions in WordPress
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the vulnerable Before After Image Comparison - Image Comparison for WP plugin (version 1.1.21 or earlier) to be installed and active on a WordPress site, and requires a victim to interact with an attacker-supplied payload (UI:R) - typically a logged-in administrator or site visitor clicking a crafted link or loading an attacker-influenced page. No authentication is needed to deliver the payload (PR:N), but the mandatory user interaction and the requirement that the specific plugin be present and exposed are the key factors limiting realistic exploitation; sites not running this plugin are unaffected. |
| Impact | The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L, base 7.1 HIGH) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated reflected/stored cross-site scripting flaw (CWE-79) that requires victim interaction (UI:R) and crosses a security scope boundary (S:C) with limited confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. No EPSS score was supplied, the CVE is NOT listed in CISA KEV, and no public proof-of-concept is referenced, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' Real-world risk is moderate and lower than the 7.1 headline suggests: XSS requires tricking an authenticated administrator or a visitor into loading an attacker-controlled payload, limiting it to targeted rather than automated mass exploitation. The only intelligence source is Patchstack; without EPSS or active-exploitation signals, this is best treated as a routine patch-when-convenient issue for sites running the affected plugin rather than an emergency, though the unauthenticated nature (PR:N) raises its relative priority among XSS bugs. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker crafts a malicious URL or page input containing JavaScript that the Before After Image Comparison plugin (version 1.1.21 or earlier) reflects or stores without proper sanitization. When a logged-in WordPress administrator or site visitor is lured into loading the payload, the script executes in their browser session, enabling session/cookie theft or actions on their behalf. No authentication is required to deliver the payload (PR:N), but victim interaction is mandatory (UI:R), and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 10, 2026
Unauthenticated cross-site scripting in the WordPress plugin Before After Image Comparison - Image Comparison for WP (versions 1.1.21 and earlier) allows a remote attacker to deliver a crafted payload that executes JavaScript in a victim's browser, but only after that victim interacts with the attacker-supplied link or page (CVSS 3.1 base 7.1, HIGH). The vulnerable plugin must be installed and active on the target WordPress site for any exploitation to be possible; sites not running it are unaffected. At the time of analysis there is no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation (not in CISA KEV) and no public exploit code identified, and no EPSS score was supplied, so the practical risk is governed mainly by the mandatory user interaction and the need for the specific plugin to be present and reachable.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch is identified in the provided data, so the fixed version cannot be named with confidence even though the affected range ends at 1.1.21 and a later release may contain a fix. The most reliable immediate action is to check the plugin's current version and update to the newest available release as soon as the vendor publishes one, and if the plugin is not essential, deactivate and remove it entirely - doing so removes the attack surface with the only real trade-off being loss of the image comparison feature. Where the plugin must stay active, limit exposure by restricting it to trusted content authors, review any shortcodes, blocks, or query parameters that feed the comparison output, and deploy virtual patching or WAF rules that block script-bearing payloads targeting the plugin's endpoints (trading some false-positive risk on legitimate input). Keep WordPress core, the theme, and all other plugins current, since XSS delivered through a low-privilege vector frequently chains with other weaknesses, and enable plugin auto-updates so a future fixed release is applied without waiting for manual intervention; monitor the Patchstack advisory link above for the official patch version.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a CWE-79 cross-site scripting weakness in a WordPress plugin, as catalogued by Patchstack under the bplugins vendor namespace (CPE cpe:2.3:a:bplugins:before_after_image_comparison_-_image_comparison_for_wp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, i.e. all versions of the plugin including 1.1.21 and earlier). Root cause is improper neutralization of user-controllable input before it is rendered into a page - the plugin's before/after image comparison output does not adequately escape or sanitize attacker-influenced values, so injected markup and script execute in the context of the affected site. The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L confirms remote network delivery at low complexity with no privileges required, a changed security scope (S:C - script executes in the site's origin rather than a sandboxed context), and limited confidentiality, integrity and availability impact. The high UI:R component means the payload must be triggered by a victim, typically a logged-in administrator or a site visitor clicking a crafted link or loading an attacker-influenced page, and the unauth qualifier applies to delivery of the payload rather than to the victim's privilege level.
Know when Wordpress Plugin gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Unauthenticated network-delivered XSS (AV:N/PR:N) needing victim interaction (UI:R); script executes in a different security context (S:C) with limited C/I/A browser-session impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).
CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack
DescriptionCVE.org
Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Before After Image Comparison - Image comparison for WP <= 1.1.21 versions.
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity cross-site scripting flaw in the WordPress plugin 'Before After Image Comparison - Image Comparison for WP' (versions 1.1.21 and earlier) can allow an attacker to execute malicious JavaScript in the browser of a site visitor who interacts with a crafted link or page, potentially exposing session data or enabling actions performed under the site's trust. Only organizations with this specific plugin installed and active on a reachable WordPress site are exposed, and no vendor-released patch is currently available. Leadership should care because closing the exposure requires either taking the plugin offline or depending on interim controls until the vendor ships a fix.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: deactivate or uninstall the plugin where it is not essential; apply WAF or reverse-proxy virtual patching rules to block script-injection payloads against the plugin's parameters; enforce output encoding and a restrictive Content-Security-Policy on affected sites; reduce exposure by limiting untrusted inbound links and link previews; and monitor the vendor advisory daily for a fixed release above version 1.1.21.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
More in Wordpress Plugin
View allThe Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1
The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil
Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote
The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner
The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut
The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via
The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based
SQL injection in the NotificationX WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.8.2) allows unauthenticated remote a
The POST SMTP Mailer - Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress i
The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin - for Online Courses and Education plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to union base
The Email Subscribers by Icegram Express plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘hash’ parameter in
Remote code execution in the WP Query Console WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 1.0) by Ajit Bohra allows u
EUVD-2026-96469
GHSA-f5jf-hmc9-f4ww
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB