Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate with low-privilege account
-
DeliveryPOST payload to /inventory/configuration/variants 'code'/'name' field
-
ExploitMalicious JS persisted server-side
-
ExecutionVictim user opens management panel
-
ImpactScript executes in victim browser context
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires a valid authenticated account on the target StockAgile instance (PR:L) with the ability to submit product-variant data to the REST endpoint '/inventory/configuration/variants' (fields such as 'code' and 'name'). Payload execution additionally requires a second authenticated user to view the affected management-panel page (UI:P), so it is not self-contained remote-unauthenticated exploitation. Limiting factors: attacker must first obtain panel credentials, impact is confined to the victim's browser session context (no direct server compromise, no availability impact, no scope change per the 4.0 vector), and a vendor patch is already available. |
| Impact | This is a moderate, not urgent, priority. The provided CVSS 4.0 base score is 5.1 (medium) with vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N. Two of the metrics materially cap real-world risk: PR:L means the attacker must already hold a valid authenticated account on the StockAgile instance, and UI:P (passive user interaction) means a legitimate authenticated user must subsequently view the poisoned management-panel page for the payload to fire. Exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' - there is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no POC referenced in the input, so there is no signal of active or automated exploitation. There is no SSVC decision data provided. The only strengthening signal is that the flaw was reported by a national CERT (INCIBE) and a vendor patch is available, which confirms the issue is real and validated rather than speculative. Impacts are limited (VC:L/VI:L, no availability impact, no scope change to other systems per the 4.0 vector), consistent with a stored XSS that runs in the browser context of panel users. Net: a genuine but bounded authenticated stored-XSS issue - patch on a normal cycle rather than emergency response. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already has a low-privileged authenticated account on a StockAgile instance submits a product variant via the REST endpoint '/inventory/configuration/variants' with a malicious JavaScript payload placed in a text field such as 'code' or 'name'. The payload is stored unsanitized and later executes in the browser of any authenticated user who opens the corresponding management-panel view, enabling session/action abuse in that user's context. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 25, 2026
Stored cross-site scripting in the StockAgile inventory management platform allows an authenticated user to persist malicious JavaScript into product-variant records via the REST endpoint '/inventory/configuration/variants'. Because the 'code', 'name', and other text fields are not sanitized before being rendered in the web management panel, the injected script executes in the browser of any authenticated operator who later views the affected configuration page, enabling session hijacking or panel actions in that user's context. Exploitation requires a valid panel account plus a second authenticated user to trigger rendering, no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and a vendor patch is already available, making this a moderate rather than urgent priority.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor patch released through Novadigits Technologies - the INCIBE-CERT advisory (https://www.incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso/stored-cross-site-scripting-stockagile-novadigits-technologies) is referenced as the patch source - and confirm the patched build with the vendor before assuming the endpoint is safe. Until upgrading, the practical compensating controls are: restrict network access to the management panel and the '/inventory/configuration/variants' REST endpoint to trusted administrative networks or VPN (trade-off: reduced operational flexibility for distributed warehouse staff); enforce output encoding or a strict Content-Security-Policy on the panel so any residual script is neutralized in the browser (trade-off: CSP misconfiguration can break legitimate panel UI); and place an input-validation/deny-list filter (for example, a WAF rule rejecting '<', '>', 'javascript:' and event-handler attributes in variant text fields) in front of the API (trade-off: WAF bypasses are possible and rules need tuning to avoid blocking legitimate product data). Because the vector requires an authenticated account, tightening panel account provisioning, removing dormant users, and enabling MFA on StockAgile logins also reduces the attack surface, though none of these substitutes for the patch. Note that the injection persists in stored records, so after patching, previously stored malicious values should be audited and cleansed from the variant configuration data.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The issue is a classic CWE-79 stored (persistent) cross-site scripting flaw in a REST-driven web application. StockAgile exposes a server-side endpoint, '/inventory/configuration/variants', that accepts user-supplied inventory variant data and writes it to the backend datastore. The affected parameters ('code', 'name', and other free-text fields) are neither input-filtered on write nor output-encoded on read, so any HTML/JavaScript stored in those fields is later reflected into the management-panel DOM and executed by the victim's browser. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) and the independent CVSS 3.1 assessment (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N) both characterize a remote, low-privilege-authenticated attacker whose payload only executes when a second authenticated user (UI:P) opens the tainted page; impact is confined to the victim's browser session (low confidentiality and integrity, no availability impact), which is typical for stored XSS against a back-office panel rather than the public storefront. The CPE string 'cpe:2.3:a:novadigits_technologies:stockagile:*' confirms the affected product family is StockAgile from Novadigits Technologies, with no version qualifier published, so all deployments on unpatched builds should be treated as potentially affected.
Know when Stockagile gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Network-reachable authenticated injection (PR:L) that executes only when another panel user views the content (UI:R); stored XSS crosses into the victim's browser context (S:C) with limited C/I and no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (INCIBE).
CVSS VectorVendor: INCIBE
DescriptionCVE.org
Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in StockAgile API and management panel. The vulnerability is present on the server side in REST endpoint '/inventory/configuration/variants' that allow the injection and persistence of malicious JavaScript code through parameters such as ‘code’, ‘name’, and other text fields. The scripts that are entered are not filtered or validated correctly before being displayed on the web panel that authenticated users can access. Exploiting this vulnerability could allow a remote, previously authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
More in Stockagile
View allStored cross-site scripting in the StockAgile management panel and REST API lets an authenticated user persist arbitrary
Stored cross-site scripting in the StockAgile inventory management platform allows an authenticated user with permission
Stored cross-site scripting in the StockAgile API and management panel lets a remote authenticated user persist maliciou
Stored cross-site scripting in the StockAgile management panel lets an authenticated user who can write to the REST endp
Stored cross-site scripting in StockAgile allows an authenticated low-privileged attacker to inject persistent JavaScrip
Stored cross-site scripting in the StockAgile API and management panel allows an authenticated remote attacker to persis
EUVD-2026-86620
GHSA-xw72-fqp7-79jm
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB