Skip to main content

BEAR CVE-2026-57320

| EUVDEUVD-2026-40096 HIGH
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-06-29 Patchstack GHSA-w5v2-p57c-3889
7.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Patchstack
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Craft malicious XSS payload for BEAR parameter
  2. Delivery
    Deliver crafted link or request to victim
  3. Exploit
    Victim (admin) interacts and triggers injection
  4. Execution
    Script executes in WordPress session context
  5. Impact
    Steal session/perform admin actions

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires no attacker authentication (PR:N) but does require victim user interaction (UI:R) - a user, typically an authenticated WordPress administrator using the BEAR/woo-bulk-editor interface, must be induced to load the attacker-crafted request or page. The specific vulnerable parameter, endpoint, and whether the vector is reflected (needs social-engineered delivery per request) or stored (persists and fires when an admin views affected data) are not stated in the available data and limit precise scoping. Limiting factors: the target site must have BEAR <= 1.1.8 installed and active, and impact is confined to in-browser script execution (C:L/I:L/A:L) rather than direct server-side code execution.

Impact

Signals are moderate and broadly consistent. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.1 (High) is driven by network vector, low complexity, no privileges, and scope change, but is tempered by UI:R (a victim must be enticed to act) and only Low confidentiality/integrity/availability impact - typical of XSS rather than direct server compromise. There is no EPSS value, no KEV listing, and no public POC provided, so there is no evidence of active or automated exploitation; this reads as a real but not emergency-priority issue. The principal uncertainty is whether this is reflected or stored XSS (the description does not specify) - stored XSS targeting an authenticated admin would be materially more dangerous than reflected XSS requiring social engineering. Verify the variant and the fixed version against the Patchstack advisory before final prioritization.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker crafts a URL or form submission containing a malicious script payload aimed at a vulnerable BEAR parameter and lures a logged-in WordPress administrator into clicking it. Because exploitation needs no authentication on the attacker's side but does require the victim to interact (UI:R), the script then runs in the admin's browser session, enabling session/cookie theft, admin-action forgery, or injected content. No public POC is referenced, so an attacker would need to develop the payload independently.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 29, 2026

Reflected/stored cross-site scripting in the WordPress plugin BEAR (realmag777's WooCommerce Bulk Editor and Products Manager, woo-bulk-editor) version 1.1.8 and earlier allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to inject malicious script that executes in a victim's browser when the victim is lured to interact with a crafted request. The CVSS:3.1 vector (AV:N/PR:N/UI:R/S:C) indicates network-reachable, no-authentication exploitation that requires user interaction and crosses a security scope boundary. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV; it was reported by Patchstack.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available data; the input states only that versions <= 1.1.8 are affected, so administrators should consult the Patchstack advisory (https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/woo-bulk-editor/vulnerability/wordpress-bear-plugin-1-1-8-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability) and upgrade to the first release above 1.1.8 once confirmed by realmag777. Until a confirmed fixed version is installed, reduce exposure by deactivating the BEAR plugin if it is not in active use (trade-off: bulk-editing functionality is lost), restricting access to the plugin's admin pages and any public-facing endpoints via web-server or firewall rules, and deploying a WAF/virtual-patch rule (Patchstack offers one) to filter XSS payloads against the affected parameters (trade-off: signature rules can be bypassed and may need tuning). Advise administrators not to follow untrusted links into the WordPress admin while logged in.

Affected VersionsENISA

BEAR n/a ≤1.1.8

Affected Packages

euvd bear no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation) issue in BEAR, a WordPress/WooCommerce administrative plugin authored by realmag777 (CPE cpe:2.3:a:realmag777:bear:*). XSS arises when user-controllable input is reflected into or stored in HTML output without proper encoding or sanitization, so the browser parses attacker-supplied data as executable script. The scope-changed (S:C) rating reflects that script executes in the trusted context of the WordPress site/admin session, a different security authority than the vulnerable component that emitted it. Because PR:N is set, the injection sink is reachable without authenticating to the plugin, though delivery still depends on getting a victim (often a logged-in administrator using this admin-facing tool) to trigger the payload.

Know when Bear gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Patchstack) PRIMARY 7.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
vuln.today AI 7.1 HIGH

Unauthenticated network XSS (PR:N, AV:N, AC:L) requiring victim interaction (UI:R); script runs in a different security scope (S:C) with limited browser-context C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).

CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in BEAR <= 1.1.8 versions.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The WordPress plugin BEAR (WooCommerce Bulk Editor and Products Manager) versions 1.1.8 and earlier contain an unauthenticated cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts into customer browsers. Any e-commerce operation using this plugin to manage products faces customer data theft and brand damage if a victim is tricked into visiting a crafted link. With no vendor patch available, immediate action is required to protect customer trust and compliance posture.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Deploy WAF rules to detect and block script injection attempts targeting BEAR endpoints; (2) Enforce strict Content Security Policy (CSP) headers prohibiting inline script execution; (3) Restrict BEAR plugin access to administrative IP ranges only; (4) Enable continuous monitoring for malicious script execution in admin and frontend contexts; (5) Conduct user awareness training to avoid clicking suspicious links referencing your store domain.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 92% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche WooCommerce bulk-editor admin plugin, limited install base
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy