Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain local System-level execution on device
-
ExploitInvoke platform_msg_handler_init message path
-
ExecutionTrigger missing permission check (CWE-862)
-
ImpactEscalate to full privilege / bypass authorization
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess local System execution privileges on the Android device and to reach the platform_msg_handler_init code path in default_msg_handlers.c, where a required permission check is missing (CWE-862). No user interaction is needed (UI:N). The key limiting factors are: (1) local access only - there is no network/remote vector (AV:L); and (2) a high pre-existing privilege level (PR:H, 'System execution privileges needed'), meaning this cannot be launched from an unprivileged app or remotely. It is an authorization-boundary bypass available to an already-privileged local actor, not a path to initial device compromise. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-priority local privilege escalation (CVSS 6.7, CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N) in Android's platform_msg_handler_init (default_msg_handlers.c), classified as CWE-862 (Missing Authorization). The signals are internally consistent and point to a bounded threat: AV:L means the attacker must already have local code execution on the device, and PR:H combined with the description's note that 'System execution privileges needed' means a fairly privileged (System-level) starting position is required - this is not a remote or zero-click flaw. The 'total' technical impact in SSVC aligns with C:H/I:H/A:H. However, SSVC Exploitation is 'none' and there is no CISA KEV listing and no public POC, so this is best read as a high-impact-but-high-barrier issue rather than an actively-exploited emergency. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so exploitation-probability cannot be factored in - this is a data gap. The requirement for pre-existing System privileges materially lowers real-world risk: an attacker already at System has substantial control, so the marginal gain is primarily full privilege escalation / sandbox or permission-boundary bypass rather than initial compromise. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A malicious or compromised process already running with System execution privileges on an Android device invokes the message-handler initialization path, which fails to enforce a required permission check. By exercising this path, the process bypasses the authorization boundary and escalates to full privilege without any user interaction. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, so this would currently require custom tooling. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026
Local privilege escalation in Google Android's platform message handler lets an actor who already holds System-level execution privileges bypass a missing permission check in platform_msg_handler_init (default_msg_handlers.c) and obtain high-impact control over confidentiality, integrity, and availability on the device. Rated CVSS 6.7 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), the issue requires local access and a pre-existing high privilege level, making it an authorization-boundary bypass for an already-privileged local actor rather than a path to initial device compromise. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and CISA's SSVC assessment records Exploitation: none and Automatable: no, while a vendor fix is published in the October 2026 Android Security Bulletin.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor fix distributed through the Android Security Bulletin for Pixel devices dated 2026-10-01 at https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/pixel/2026/2026-10-01, which is the authoritative patch reference; the supplied data does not include an exact build or version string, so verify that a device's security patch level matches or exceeds the bulletin's and coordinate with OEMs for AOSP-derived builds that lag the Pixel release. If patching cannot be performed immediately, the applicable compensating controls follow from the exploitation prerequisites (local access only, PR:H, UI:N): keep SELinux in enforcing mode to constrain which domains can invoke System-level platform handlers, disable or tightly restrict adb and developer/root debugging on production devices (trade-off: loss of field debugging and support capability), limit the set of preinstalled or sideloaded System-privileged components, and monitor or alert on anomalous behavior by System-privileged processes. These measures shrink the blast radius but do not remove the missing authorization check, so patching remains required; no public exploit code or confirmed in-the-wild activity is identified in the available data.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
default_msg_handlers.c belongs to Android's platform message handling infrastructure, where platform_msg_handler_init registers handlers that process system-level messages; the defect is a missing permission check (CWE-862, Missing Authorization), so a caller can reach a privileged code path without the required authorization test being performed. Because the missing check sits on a handler reached through local system message routing, the practical exposure is limited to callers that already possess System execution privileges on the device, which is exactly what the assessed vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H encodes: local-only access (AV:L), low attack complexity (AC:L), high privileges required (PR:H), no user interaction (UI:N), scope unchanged, and full impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The affected-product CPE cpe:2.3:a:google:android:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies Google Android as the platform, and the ENISA EUVD entry EUVD-2026-93789 lists "Android Android kernel" among the affected components while the sole vendor reference points to the Android Security Bulletin for Pixel devices dated 2026-10-01. This is an internal authorization-boundary weakness in platform code, not a remote or unauthenticated attack surface.
Know when Android gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local vector and no user interaction per description; PR:H because the description states System execution privileges are required; full C/I/A impact matches SSVC total technical impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (Google_Devices).
CVSS VectorVendor: Google_Devices
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
In platform_msg_handler_init of default_msg_handlers.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.466
Integer underflow in the MPEG4Extractor::parseChunk function in MPEG4Extractor.cpp in libstagefright in mediaserver in A
Android 3.0 through 4.1.x on Disney Mobile, eAccess, KDDI, NTT DOCOMO, SoftBank, and other devices does not properly imp
Integer overflow in the SampleTable::setSampleToChunkParams function in SampleTable.cpp in libstagefright in Android bef
Apktool versions 2.9.1 and prior contain a path traversal vulnerability when processing Android APK files. Malicious APK
An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Android system (art). Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability
The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Android 1.6 Donut through 4.2 Jelly Bean does not properly check cryptographic signatures for applications, which allows
luni/src/main/java/java/io/ObjectInputStream.java in the java.io.ObjectInputStream implementation in Android before 5.0.
The Broadcom Wi-Fi driver in the kernel in Android 4.x before 4.4.4, 5.x before 5.1.1 LMY49G, and 6.x before 2016-02-01
EUVD-2026-93789
GHSA-ppgg-x5x7-jmfv
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB