Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain document-editor access to shared doc
-
DeliveryInject script into document name/description
-
ExploitOwner opens document, payload executes in their origin
-
ExecutionScript acts through authenticated session
-
PersistRewrite access rules to grant owner rights
-
ImpactExfiltrate or modify document data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation of the primary vector requires the attacker to already hold document-editor access to a shared Grist document (PR:L), and requires a higher-privileged user - such as the document owner - to subsequently open that document (UI:R), which is why owner escalation is possible only when such a victim views the malicious name/description. The OAuth2-page reflected vector requires a victim to load a URL whose openerOrigin parameter the attacker controls. Limiting factors: exploitation is not possible against a single-user or trusted-only-editor deployment, depends on victim interaction, and is rated high complexity (AC:H) because it hinges on a suitably privileged user loading the payload; it does not affect availability. |
| Impact | The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N, base 7.7 High) captures the real profile well: network-reachable, but requiring low-privilege authentication (a document editor, PR:L), user interaction (a victim must open the malicious document, UI:R), and rated high attack complexity because a suitably privileged victim must load the payload. The scope change (S:C) and C:H/I:H reflect the core danger - script executing in the victim's origin crosses a privilege boundary, enabling editor-to-owner escalation, data theft, and modification of access rules; availability is unaffected (A:N). No KEV listing and no POC are indicated in the intelligence, so this is a real but not urgently-exploited priority: the barrier is having write/editor access to a shared document plus a higher-privileged viewer. EPSS is not provided in the input and cannot be cited. The AC:H and UI:R factors meaningfully limit mass exploitation, making this most relevant to multi-tenant or collaboratively-shared Grist deployments rather than internet-wide opportunistic attacks. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with document-editor rights sets a document's name or description to an HTML/JavaScript payload; when a document owner or other user opens that document, the script runs in their authenticated Grist session and silently rewrites access rules to grant the attacker owner-level control. Alternatively, an attacker crafts a link to the OAuth2 end-of-flow page with a malicious openerOrigin value and lures a victim into clicking it to reflect and execute script. No public exploit code is identified, but the flaw is straightforward stored/reflected XSS. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 10, 2026
Stored and reflected cross-site scripting in Grist (grist-core) prior to 1.7.15 lets a document editor inject script into a document's name or description that executes when higher-privileged users open the document, and lets attackers abuse the OAuth2 end-of-flow page's reflected openerOrigin parameter. Because the injected script runs in the victim's authenticated Grist origin, a mere document editor can read or modify data, alter sharing settings and access rules, and escalate to owner-level control. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; the issue is CWE-79 and is fixed upstream in the tagged 1.7.15 release.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: 1.7.15 - upgrade grist-core to version 1.7.15 or later, which adds full escaping of the affected values (see release https://github.com/gristlabs/grist-core/releases/tag/v1.7.15, commit 4ced8064b7ea0e1763d5a6a2588b22774ce7efbc, and advisory GHSA-6qrq-h2h6-cw54). If immediate upgrade is not possible, reduce exposure by limiting document-editor rights on shared documents to trusted users only (removing the injection vector for the name/description sink) and by restricting or fronting the OAuth2 end-of-flow endpoint so the openerOrigin parameter cannot be attacker-supplied to victims; these controls narrow but do not eliminate the flaw and may disrupt legitimate collaboration and SSO login flows, so they are stopgaps until 1.7.15 is deployed.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Grist is an open-source spreadsheet/database application from Grist Labs that uses Python as its formula language and serves several server-rendered pages. The root cause is CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation): user-controlled values were embedded into HTML pages and into inline <script> blocks without full contextual escaping. Two sinks are named - the main application page renders a document's editor-supplied name/description into the page loaded by other users (stored/persistent XSS), and the OAuth2 end-of-flow page reflects the openerOrigin request parameter back into the served page (reflected XSS). Inline-script context is particularly dangerous because HTML-entity escaping alone is insufficient inside a script element, allowing breakout into executable JavaScript. The affected component per CPE is cpe:2.3:a:gristlabs:grist-core, i.e. the self-hosted grist-core codebase.
Know when Python gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Editor access gives PR:L and reliable stored-XSS injection gives AC:L; a higher-privileged victim must open the doc (UI:R), script crosses the user boundary (S:C) enabling data read/modify (C:H/I:H), no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (GitHub_M).
CVSS VectorVendor: GitHub_M
Lifecycle Timeline
1DescriptionCVE.org
Grist is spreadsheet software using Python as its formula language. Prior to 1.7.15, several server-rendered Grist pages embedded user-controlled values into the page and into inline scripts without fully escaping them, allowing cross-site scripting. On the main application page, a document's name or description, set by a document editor, is rendered into the page that other users load when opening the document. On the OAuth2 end-of-flow page, the openerOrigin request parameter was reflected back into the served page. Injected script runs in the victim's Grist origin and can act through the authenticated session, reading or modifying data and changing sharing settings and access rules. A document editor could therefore escalate to owner-level access. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.15.
Articles & Coverage 1
Executive ViewAI
Grist document collaboration platform versions prior to 1.7.15 are vulnerable to privilege escalation attacks that allow document editors to inject malicious code into document metadata. When higher-privileged users open affected documents, the injected code executes with their permissions, enabling attackers to steal sensitive data, modify document contents, change access controls, and gain administrative rights. Organizations deploying Grist face significant risks of data compromise and unauthorized administrative access.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
Wazuh SIEM platform versions 4.4.0 through 4.9.0 contain an unsafe deserialization vulnerability in the DistributedAPI t
BentoML version 1.4.2 and earlier contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability through insecure deser
pgAdmin 4 contains critical remote code execution vulnerabilities in the Query Tool download and Cloud Deployment endpoi
The renderLocalView function in render/views.py in graphite-web in Graphite 0.9.5 through 0.9.10 uses the pickle Python
BentoML is a Python library for building online serving systems optimized for AI apps and model inference. Rated critica
OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph
pyLoad download manager version prior to 0.5.0b3.dev77 exposes the Flask SECRET_KEY through an unauthenticated endpoint.
Langflow (a visual LLM pipeline builder) contains a critical unauthenticated code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-3301
In Mercurial before 4.1.3, "hg serve --stdio" allows remote authenticated users to launch the Python debugger, and conse
Unauthenticated remote code execution affects Kestra OSS (the open-source event-driven orchestration platform) prior to
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Marimo ≤0.20.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the `/
pyLoad is the free and open-source Download Manager written in pure Python. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulne
EUVD-2026-43044
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub
Exploit-DB