Skip to main content

Langflow CVE-2026-55447

CRITICAL
UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Following (CWE-61)
2026-06-19 https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow GHSA-ccv6-r384-xp75
9.6
CVSS 3.1 · GitHub Advisory
Share

Severity by source

GitHub Advisory PRIMARY
9.6 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI
9.9 CRITICAL

Network-exploitable via file upload to a Langflow flow; attacker typically needs at least low-privilege flow access (PR:L), no user interaction once submitted, and the secret-key leak crosses authority scope enabling full RCE.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Primary rating from GitHub Advisory.

CVSS VectorGitHub Advisory

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Source Code Evidence Fetched
Jun 19, 2026 - 23:34 vuln.today
Analysis Generated
Jun 19, 2026 - 23:34 vuln.today
CVE Published
Jun 19, 2026 - 21:18 github-advisory
CRITICAL 9.6

DescriptionGitHub Advisory

Summary

All components based on BaseFileComponent are vulnerable to the following vulnerability:

  1. Docling (DoclingInlineComponent)
  2. Docling Serve (DoclingRemoteComponent)
  3. Read File (FileComponent)
  4. NVIDIA Retriever Extraction (NvidiaIngestComponent)
  5. Video File (VideoFileComponent)
  6. Unstructured API (UnstructuredComponent)

For clarity, from now on I'll only refer to Read File component.

The Read File node processes user-controlled files. Example scenario is a RAG chatbot - a system that allows users of an organization to ask questions about documents saved in the organizations.

By controlling a files that are digested into the RAG, an attacker can direct the node to read *any* file on the file-system by absolute path.

Using this vulnerability an attacker can acheive RCE:

  1. Upload a file that directs the node to read Langflow's secret_key file containing the JWT token secret.
  2. This would allow the attacker then to simply task the Chatbot for the JWT secret.
  3. Using this secret, the attacker then crafts a JWT token for any user-id, bypassing authentication.
  4. Code execution is then trivial - simply create a new flow with "Python Interpreter" node, fill it with arbitrary Python code and execute it.

Tested on commit 2d67402b1dbaefcbce85a244d4a6cd5e4bda1cfe

Details

The vulnerability is in: langflow/src/lfx/src/lfx/base/data/base_file.py Specifically in _unpack_bundle. This function extracts tar files, which can contain a symlink. This symlink can point to any file in the filesystem. Then, in self.process_files(), the file pointed by the symlink will be parsed and saved into the RAG. This can be done with unlimited number of symlinks in the same tar which can also be useful in some scenarios.

Suggestd fix - iterate over the files and make sure all are regular files or directories.

PoC

Reproduction:

  1. Create a flow with Read File (or any other affected components), and connect its output to some storage such as Chroma DB.
  2. Create a symlink pointing to any file. For the above exploit, point the symlink to langflow's JWT token file.
  3. Compress this symlink with tar.
  4. Upload it to the Read File component.
  5. Check the database, or ask a Chatbot connected to this vector database for the contents of the file.

Concrete PoC: ------------

  • Flow with RAG ingestion and a Chatbot around it: Vector Store RAG.json
  • Exploit tar: archive.tar.txt (remove .txt, GitHub blocked .tar)
  • Create a file /tmp/trip.docx with any contents in it
  • Ingest the file in the flow above, and ask the Chatbot a question about this file.

A demo showing the attack: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/af00f700-f13f-4eac-848e-8afd11fb9297 In the demo the attacker steals Langflow secret key used to sign JWTs. The second stage of the attack, not shown in the demo, is using this key to sign a JWT token and executing Python code on the server using the Python code interpreter node.

Impact

Any Langflow user using any of the above mentioned components to ingest user-controlled data is affected. Depending on exact scenario, the user can also be exposed to an RCE risk.

Patches

Fixed in 1.9.2 via PR #12945. BaseFileComponent._unpack_bundle now rejects symlink and hardlink members (and any non-regular entries) during TAR extraction, with additional defensive symlink filtering during directory recursion and after extraction. Upgrade to 1.9.2 or later.

Ori Lahav Security Researcher @ Rubrik Inc.

AnalysisAI

Arbitrary file read leading to remote code execution affects Langflow versions prior to 1.9.2 in any flow that uses BaseFileComponent-derived nodes (Read File, Docling, Docling Serve, NVIDIA Retriever Extraction, Video File, Unstructured API). An attacker who can submit a TAR archive containing symlinks - for example through a RAG ingestion pipeline that accepts user documents - causes the server to follow those links and ingest arbitrary host files such as Langflow's JWT secret_key, which can then be used to forge admin tokens and execute Python via the Code Interpreter node. …

Unlock full vulnerability intelligence

  • Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
  • Attack chain visualization
  • Remediation with exact patch versions
  • Threat intelligence from 22 sources
  • Personal watchlist & email alerts

Free forever · No credit card required

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata

Recon
Identify exposed RAG ingestion flow
Delivery
Craft TAR with absolute-path symlink to secret_key
Exploit
Upload archive to Read File component
Install
Query chatbot/vector store to retrieve leaked secret
C2
Forge admin JWT with stolen signing key
Execute
Create flow with Python Interpreter node
Impact
Execute arbitrary code on server

Vulnerability AssessmentAI

Exploitation Requires that the target Langflow deployment contains at least one flow using a BaseFileComponent-derived node (Read File / Docling / Docling Serve / NVIDIA Retriever Extraction / Video File / Unstructured API) and that the attacker can submit a TAR archive into that flow's file input - typically a RAG ingestion pipeline that accepts user-controlled documents. … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment.
Risk Assessment The vendor-supplied CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H (9.6 Critical) is plausible for network-exposed Langflow instances offering public document upload, but PR:N and UI:R are deployment-dependent - many Langflow installs require authentication to submit flows, in which case real-world PR is L or H. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in.
Exploit Scenario An attacker submits a document to a public Langflow-backed RAG chatbot, but the upload is a TAR archive containing a symlink named e.g. `leak` whose linkname is `/app/data/secret_key`. …
Remediation Vendor-released patch: Langflow 1.9.2 - upgrade via `pip install --upgrade langflow>=1.9.2` per the fix delivered in PR https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/pull/12945, which makes `_safe_extract_tar` reject symlink, hardlink, and non-regular TAR members and adds defensive `is_symlink()` filtering during directory recursion. … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report.

Recommended ActionAI

Within 24 hours: Identify all Langflow deployments and assess whether they process user-supplied documents or external file inputs. …

Sign in for detailed remediation steps and compensating controls.

Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.

Share

CVE-2026-55447 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy