Skip to main content

GAO EPDS CVE-2026-54106

| EUVDEUVD-2026-37913 MEDIUM
Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel (CWE-940)
2026-06-18 cisa-cg GHSA-96f7-vmp7-7rvh
5.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: cisa-cg
Share

Severity by source

Vendor (cisa-cg) PRIMARY
5.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
vuln.today AI
3.8 LOW

Network-delivered via HTTP with low complexity; PR:H required because compromised admin credentials are a hard prerequisite; no availability impact from the login bypass itself.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (cisa-cg).

CVSS VectorVendor: cisa-cg

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
X

Lifecycle Timeline

4
CVSS changed
Jun 18, 2026 - 19:38 NVD
4.7 (MEDIUM) 5.1 (MEDIUM)
Patch available
Jun 18, 2026 - 19:01 EUVD
Analysis Generated
Jun 18, 2026 - 17:11 vuln.today
CVE Published
Jun 18, 2026 - 16:13 cve.org
MEDIUM 4.7

DescriptionCVE.org

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Electronic Protest Docketing System (EPDS) and Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA) Electronic Docketing System (EDS) do not validate X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers, allowing a remote attacker with compromised administrator credentials to bypass network access controls and log in.

AnalysisAI

Network access control bypass in the U.S. Government Accountability Office Electronic Protest Docketing System (EPDS) and Civilian Board of Contract Appeals Electronic Docketing System (EDS) allows a remote attacker holding compromised administrator credentials to circumvent IP-based network restrictions by injecting an arbitrary X-Forwarded-For HTTP header. Both systems fail to validate or sanitize this header before using it to determine whether a request originates from an allowed network range, meaning a threat actor positioned anywhere on the internet can masquerade as a trusted network source. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at the time of analysis, and the high-privilege prerequisite (compromised admin credentials) significantly constrains opportunistic exploitation.

Technical ContextAI

CWE-940 (Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel) describes systems that trust a client-controlled signal - here the X-Forwarded-For HTTP header - to determine the origin of a connection without independent verification. X-Forwarded-For is a de facto standard header inserted by reverse proxies and load balancers to convey the originating client IP; because it is a plain HTTP header, any client can forge it arbitrarily. The affected systems are web-based legal docketing portals: cpe:2.3:a:government_accountability_office:electronic_protest_docketing_system_(epds):*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* hosted at epds.gao.gov, and cpe:2.3:a:civilian_board_of_contract_appeals:electronic_docketing_system_(eds):*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* at eds.cbca.gov. Both implement network-level access controls presumably intended to restrict administrative login to government network ranges, but these controls are rendered ineffective by blind trust in the attacker-supplied header. The 'Microsoft' tag present in the CVE metadata may indicate the underlying application platform or hosting stack, but this is not confirmed from available data.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version has been independently confirmed from the available data; the CISA CSAF advisory at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cisagov/CSAF/develop/csaf_files/IT/white/2026/va-26-169-01.json should be reviewed for official remediation guidance. The primary fix should be application-level: the systems must be updated to ignore or strip attacker-supplied X-Forwarded-For headers and instead derive client IP from the actual TCP connection source address or from a trusted reverse proxy header set by infrastructure the application controls. As a compensating control, network access controls should be enforced at the infrastructure layer (firewall or load balancer) rather than relying on application-layer header inspection, removing the attacker's ability to influence the access decision entirely. Additionally, because exploitation requires compromised administrator credentials, enforcing multi-factor authentication for all administrator accounts and auditing active administrator sessions would reduce the practical impact of any credential compromise. Rotating all administrator credentials and reviewing recent administrative login activity is advisable as a precautionary measure given the nature of this bypass.

Share

CVE-2026-54106 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy