Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain Agent/Configure permission in target Jenkins instance
-
DeliveryCraft POST config.xml request with XSS payload in offline cause description field
-
ExploitJenkins stores unescaped payload in agent configuration
-
ExecutionInduce or wait for victim user to view the affected agent page
-
PersistInjected script executes in victim's browser session
-
ImpactExfiltrate session token or perform privileged Jenkins actions as victim
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The attacker must hold Agent/Configure permission within the Jenkins instance - this is a non-default, explicitly granted role required for agent management. The target victim (who triggers the XSS payload) must navigate to a Jenkins page that renders the compromised agent's offline cause description (UI:R); a passive attacker cannot force this without social engineering or timing an agent offline event to attract administrator attention. The vulnerable endpoint is the |
| Impact | The NVD-assigned CVSS 3.1 score of 5.4 Medium (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N) accurately models the attack surface: network-reachable, low complexity, but gated behind Agent/Configure permission (PR:L) and requiring a victim to load the affected page (UI:R). These two limiting factors significantly reduce real-world impact compared to higher-severity XSS flaws. EPSS at 0.02% (5th percentile) is consistent with the access-control barrier and absence of known POC. No CISA KEV listing is present. The S:C metric is the most impactful signal here - successful exploitation crosses user-session boundaries and could allow an attacker to compromise a Jenkins administrator's session, escalating from a low-privilege agent configurator to effective administrator control. This makes the vulnerability higher priority in multi-tenant Jenkins environments or those with many users holding Agent/Configure permission. In single-admin or tightly access-controlled deployments, real-world risk is low. No conflicting signals are present in the available data. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker granted Agent/Configure permission authenticates to Jenkins and issues a |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 15, 2026
Stored XSS in Jenkins 2.483-2.567 and LTS 2.492.1-2.555.2 allows attackers holding Agent/Configure permission to inject persistent malicious scripts via the POST config.xml API by supplying an unescaped generic offline cause description. When any Jenkins user views the affected agent page, the payload executes in their browser, enabling session hijacking or unauthorized actions within the Jenkins instance. No public exploit or CISA KEV listing has been identified, and EPSS probability is low at 0.02%, reflecting the constrained attack surface from the required permission prerequisite.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Jenkins to weekly release 2.568 or LTS release 2.555.3, both confirmed as patched versions per EUVD-2026-36025 and the Jenkins security advisory at https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2026-06-10/#SECURITY-3731. If immediate patching is not feasible, revoke or restrict Agent/Configure permission from any user who does not strictly require it, directly eliminating the attacker-controlled input vector; note this may disrupt legitimate agent management workflows and should be coordinated with operations teams. As a defense-in-depth measure, enforcing Jenkins' built-in Content Security Policy (CSP) header (configurable via 'Manage Jenkins > Script Console') can limit inline script execution and reduce XSS impact, though this does not patch the underlying encoding defect and may break some Jenkins plugins or UI features. No workaround fully substitutes for the vendor patch.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in maven
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Jenkins (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:jenkins_project:jenkins) is a widely deployed open-source CI/CD automation server that exposes a POST config.xml REST API allowing users to configure agent (node) settings programmatically. One configurable field is the 'generic offline cause' description, which is displayed in the Jenkins web UI when an agent goes offline. The server fails to apply HTML entity encoding or output sanitization before rendering this field, constituting a CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation - Stored XSS) defect. Because the malicious payload is persisted server-side and replayed to any user who loads the affected page, this is a stored/persistent XSS variant with cross-user impact, reflected in the CVSS 3.1 S:C (scope changed) metric.
Know when Jenkins gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
PR:L reflects mandatory Agent/Configure permission; UI:R captures required victim page view; S:C models cross-user browser-session scope change inherent to stored XSS.
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionNVD
Jenkins 2.483 through 2.567 (both inclusive), LTS 2.492.1 through 2.555.2 (both inclusive) does not escape the user-provided description of a generic offline cause that could be set through the POST config.xml API, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers with Agent/Configure permission.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour
A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Jenkins Pipeline: Groovy Plugin 2.63 and earlier in pom.xml, src/main/java/org/
The Jenkins CLI subsystem in Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary co
The remoting module in Jenkins before 2.32 and LTS before 2.19.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a
Multiple unspecified API endpoints in Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 allow remote authenticated users to ex
The Fingerprints pages in Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive j
The remoting module in Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by
A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.53 and earlier in src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/
A code execution vulnerability exists in the Stapler web framework used by Jenkins 2.153 and earlier, LTS 2.138.3 and ea
A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.50 and earlier in src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/
A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Pipeline: Declarative Plugin 1.3.3 and earlier in. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.
A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Pipeline: Groovy Plugin 2.61 and earlier in src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins
EUVD-2026-36025
GHSA-93qh-vwrm-c5pw
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
Exploit-DB