Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain network position to spoof DNS UDP
-
DeliveryIdentify authoritative server IP being queried by Recursor
-
ExploitInject forged reply signaling EDNS unsupported
-
ExecutionRecursor caches false EDNS-incapable state for that server
-
PersistDNSSEC validation fails for all zones on that server
-
ImpactDownstream clients receive unvalidated or broken DNS responses
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Anti-spoofing controls
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The attacker must be in a network position to inject or race-spoof DNS UDP replies toward the PowerDNS Recursor, spoofing the source IP of a legitimate authoritative server - this is a non-default capability requiring either on-path access, a compromised intermediate device, or exploitation of a lack of BCP38 anti-spoofing enforcement. The Recursor must be actively querying the targeted authoritative server at the time of the attack (i.e., the server's zones must be in active use). No authentication to the Recursor is required (PR:N). No user interaction is required (UI:N). Exploitation is limited by the High attack complexity (AC:H): the attacker must win a timing race or hold network position, and standard anti-spoofing controls (BCP38, source address validation) would block off-path spoofing. The vulnerability does not require any non-default configuration of the Recursor itself. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.9 (Medium) with vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H is broadly consistent with the described attack. The High attack complexity (AC:H) reflects the genuine difficulty of spoofing DNS replies directed at a recursive resolver - the attacker must win a race or hold a network position enabling them to inject forged packets before the legitimate authoritative response arrives, a non-trivial bar. The availability impact (A:H) is appropriate because DNSSEC validation failure for an authoritative server renders DNSSEC-signed zones unresolvable through the affected Recursor. Confidentiality and integrity are rated N in the NVD vector, though the 'Information Disclosure' tag warrants caution: if the Recursor silently falls back to non-validated answers after DNSSEC failure, an integrity impact could emerge in practice; this is not confirmed by available data. EPSS score is not provided in the source data - exploitation probability cannot be quantified from available signals. No KEV listing and no known POC reduce urgency. The real-world priority is moderate-to-elevated specifically for operators who rely on DNSSEC validation for security (e.g., resolvers enforcing DNSSEC for banking, healthcare, or government domains), where validation failures have direct security consequences beyond mere availability disruption. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with the ability to inject or spoof DNS packets on the network path between the PowerDNS Recursor and a targeted authoritative server sends a forged DNS reply that mimics the authoritative server's IP but signals absence of EDNS support. The Recursor updates its internal state to mark that server as EDNS-incapable, disabling DNSSEC validation for all zones hosted on it. Downstream clients relying on the Recursor for DNSSEC-validated resolution then receive either validation failures or, potentially, unvalidated responses for those zones until the state is flushed. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 25, 2026
DNSSEC validation in PowerDNS Recursor can be silently undermined by network-positioned attackers who spoof DNS replies to trick the Recursor into permanently marking a legitimate authoritative server's IP as EDNS-incapable. Once that state is poisoned, the Recursor is unable to perform proper DNSSEC validation for any zones served by that authoritative server, effectively disabling a critical security layer for downstream clients. No active exploitation has been confirmed by CISA KEV, and no public proof-of-concept has been identified at time of analysis; however, the attack complexity is rated High due to the spoofing prerequisite.
RemediationAI
The primary remediation is to apply the patch or upgrade to the fixed version of PowerDNS Recursor as specified in the vendor advisory at https://docs.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-powerdns-2026-08.html. Exact fix versions are not independently confirmed from the available data - consult the advisory for precise version numbers. As a compensating control pending patching, operators can reduce the attack surface by deploying the Recursor behind network controls that restrict which source IPs can send DNS replies to the resolver (e.g., BCP38/BCP84 anti-spoofing filters at the network boundary, or restricting resolver-to-authoritative communication to known-good egress paths). Configuring DNSSEC validation in a mode that fails closed (rejecting queries rather than falling back to unvalidated answers) will prevent silent DNSSEC bypass if fallback behavior is possible, though this may impact availability for affected zones. Operators should also monitor for anomalous DNSSEC validation failure rates as a detection signal for active exploitation attempts.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
PowerDNS Recursor (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:powerdns:recursor:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is a recursive DNS resolver widely deployed by ISPs and enterprises. EDNS (Extension Mechanisms for DNS, RFC 6891) is a required capability for DNSSEC: it allows DNS messages larger than 512 bytes, which are needed to carry DNSSEC signatures (RRSIG) and keys (DNSKEY). When a Recursor communicates with an authoritative server, it probes for EDNS support; if the server appears not to support EDNS, the Recursor falls back to legacy DNS, losing the ability to receive and validate DNSSEC records. This vulnerability exploits that probe-and-fallback mechanism: an off-path or on-path attacker spoofs a reply to the Recursor indicating that a targeted authoritative server does not support EDNS. The Recursor then caches that (false) state, and DNSSEC validation for all zones served by that server fails for the lifetime of that cached state. The CWE is not formally assigned by NVD, but the root cause class is best described as improper state management / spoofing of protocol capability negotiation, analogous to downgrade attacks on cryptographic protocol negotiation. The 'Information Disclosure' tag in the source data is noted but appears incongruent with the CVSS impact metrics (C:N/I:N), possibly reflecting concern that DNSSEC validation failure could, in some resolver configurations, cause fallback to unvalidated answers - though the description does not explicitly confirm this behavior.
Know when Recursor gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Network spoofing attack with no privileges; AC:H reflects DNS reply race/injection requirement; availability-only impact as DNSSEC validation failure disrupts resolution.
Primary rating from Vendor (OX).
CVSS VectorVendor: OX
Lifecycle Timeline
1DescriptionCVE.org
Spoofing replies to Recursor might mark an IP of an authoritative server as not supporting EDNS, causing valdiation of DNSSEC records served by that server to fail.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
An issue has been found in PowerDNS Recursor versions 4.1.x before 4.1.9 where records in the answer section of response
An issue has been found in PowerDNS Recursor 4.1.0 up to and including 4.3.0. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulne
Crafted delegations or IP fragments can poison cached delegations in Recursor. [CVSS 8.2 HIGH]
An issue has been found in PowerDNS Recursor versions after 4.1.3 before 4.1.9 where Lua hooks are not properly applied
The label decompression functionality in PowerDNS Recursor 3.5.x, 3.6.x before 3.6.3, and 3.7.x before 3.7.2 and Authori
The label decompression functionality in PowerDNS Recursor before 3.6.4 and 3.7.x before 3.7.3 and Authoritative (Auth)
Remote, unauthenticated denial of service against PowerDNS Recursor allows a network-reachable attacker to consume or ex
Denial of service in PowerDNS Authoritative, Recursor, and dnsdist via unbounded memory allocation in their internal web
Denial of service in PowerDNS Recursor allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust resolver memory by publishing
Unlimited memory allocation in PowerDNS internal web server allows remote denial of service via crafted web requests. Th
PowerDNS Recursor can be driven into memory exhaustion by a single crafted HTTP request to its built-in internal web ser
A remote attacker might be able to cause infinite recursion in PowerDNS Recursor 4.8.0 via a DNS query that retrieves DS
EUVD-2026-39360
GHSA-c2h5-7f6m-jqmp
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB