Skip to main content

TOTOLINK T6 CVE-2026-51674

| EUVDEUVD-2026-68537 CRITICAL
Improper Access Control (CWE-284)
2026-08-31 mitre GHSA-qrpj-63w2-5rxp
9.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: mitre
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach router web interface
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted POST to cstecgi.cgi
  3. Exploit
    Invoke setScheduleCfg without auth
  4. Execution
    Register forced-reboot schedule
  5. Impact
    Device reboots repeatedly (DoS)

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The attacker must be able to send an HTTP POST to the /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi endpoint invoking the setScheduleCfg function on a TOTOLINK T6 running firmware 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015; per CVSS PR:N/UI:N no authentication, credentials, or user interaction are required. The primary limiting factor is network reachability of the management interface: exploitation from the internet requires remote administration to be enabled or the device otherwise WAN-exposed, whereas in a default LAN-only configuration the attacker must already be on the local network (or pivot through a compromised LAN host). Exploitation is also constrained to the specific affected firmware build; other versions are unverified.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, base 9.8) reflects a genuinely low-barrier attack: network-reachable, no authentication, no user interaction. However, the claimed impact profile deserves scrutiny - the described behavior is scheduling forced reboots, which is squarely an availability (DoS) issue and a configuration-integrity issue, whereas the input's C:H/I:H/A:H rating asserts full confidentiality loss that the description does not substantiate; verify the confidentiality claim against the vendor before treating data theft as confirmed. No EPSS score, KEV entry, or POC was supplied, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from the data - absence of these signals is not evidence of safety, since consumer routers exposed to the WAN are routinely mass-scanned. Practically, any operator running this firmware with the management interface reachable should treat availability disruption as a realistic and easy outcome, and even a small municipal or mid-sized ISP support team should prioritize firmware review rather than deferring it on the assumption that a niche router model is uninteresting to attackers.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who can reach the router's web interface - for example on a network where remote management is enabled, or from the LAN - sends a single crafted POST to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi invoking setScheduleCfg with no credentials, registering a recurring forced-reboot task. The device then reboots on the attacker's schedule, causing a persistent denial of service; because AC is low and no authentication or user interaction is required, the request can be scripted and repeated at scale. No public POC is referenced at time of analysis.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 01, 2026

Unauthenticated configuration tampering in the TOTOLINK T6 router (firmware 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015) lets remote attackers abuse the setScheduleCfg handler on /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi to schedule forced reboot tasks without any credentials. Because the endpoint fails to enforce access control (CWE-284), a single crafted POST can register recurring reboots that render the device persistently unavailable, and the same missing check likely exposes other schedule/config parameters. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis, though the attack is trivial and network-reachable.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released fixed firmware version is identified in the provided data, so no exact patch version can be cited - check the TOTOLINK download portal (https://www.totolink.net/home/menu/detail/menu_listtpl/download/id/190/ids/36.html) for a build newer than 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 and apply it once released. As compensating controls: ensure the router's web management interface (cstecgi.cgi) is not exposed to the WAN/Internet - disable remote administration so /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi is reachable only from the LAN, which eliminates unauthenticated external access at the cost of losing off-network management; restrict LAN-side access to the management subnet or trusted admin hosts via firewall/ACL rules, accepting reduced convenience; and monitor for unexpected scheduled-reboot behavior as a detection signal. If the device is at end-of-life or no updated firmware appears, plan hardware replacement, since the missing access check is unauthenticated and cannot be safely mitigated while the interface remains reachable.

Affected VersionsENISA

n/a n/a

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

TOTOLINK SOHO routers expose a CGI backend at /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi that dispatches JSON/form actions to internal handlers; setScheduleCfg is the routine responsible for cron-like scheduled tasks such as timed reboots. The root cause is CWE-284 (Improper Access Control): the handler does not verify session authentication or authorization before accepting the request, so any client that can reach the web interface can invoke privileged configuration functions. The CPE string provided ('cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a:*') is a placeholder and does not identify the product; identification here relies on the description, which pins the exact firmware build 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 on the T6 model.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (mitre) PRIMARY 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.2 HIGH

Unauthenticated remote request (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); impact is forced reboots so A:H, config change gives I:L, and no disclosure supports C:N rather than the input's C:H.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).

CVSS VectorVendor: mitre

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

3
CVSS changed
Sep 01, 2026 - 13:22 NVD
9.8 (CRITICAL)
CVE Published
Aug 31, 2026 - 00:00 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)
CVE Published
Aug 31, 2026 - 00:00 cve.org
CRITICAL 9.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Incorrect access control in the setScheduleCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to configure forced reboot tasks via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

TOTOLINK T6 routers running firmware 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 can be remotely forced into repeated reboots without authentication, causing persistent network outages that disable business operations and remote access. Any organization using this router model faces immediate operational risk, and while no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, the attack is trivial and network-accessible. This critical unauthenticated vulnerability requires urgent mitigation to prevent business continuity disruptions.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) restrict network access to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi endpoint via firewall (block POST requests to setScheduleCfg handler); (2) disable remote administrative interfaces if not operationally critical; (3) isolate affected routers to trusted networks only; (4) implement automated configuration backups to enable rapid recovery; (5) monitor device uptime and authentication logs for unexpected restart patterns; (6) consider replacement with alternative router hardware pending patch availability.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 93% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche single-model SOHO router, limited enterprise footprint
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Out-of-Cycle
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

49
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +49
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy