NukeViet CMS CVE-2026-49259

Summary

A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in NukeViet CMS versions 4.x through 4.5.08. A low-privileged authenticated user can store a JavaScript payload in their profile's display name fields. The payload executes in the browser of any visitor - including administrators - who clicks the Reply ("Answer") link on a comment posted by that user.

Affected Component

The {COMMENT.post_name} template variable is interpolated without JavaScript-context escaping into an inline onclick handler in both comment block positions:

• themes/default/modules/comment/comment.tpl line 27 (top-level comments)
• themes/default/modules/comment/comment.tpl line 64 (nested/reply comments)

onclick="nv_commment_feedback(event, {COMMENT.cid}, '{COMMENT.post_name}')"

Root Cause

The first_name and last_name profile fields are sanitized with HTML numeric character references (' → ', ( → (, ) → ), / → /) via Request::_get_title() with $specialchars = true. This encoding is correct for plain HTML attribute and element contexts, but insufficient for a JavaScript string literal embedded inside an HTML attribute.

Browsers decode HTML entities in attribute values before the JavaScript engine parses the string. As a result, ' is decoded back to ', which terminates the JS string early and allows the remainder of the value to be executed as JavaScript.

The combined display name (nv_show_name_user(first_name, last_name)) is what reaches the template, giving an attacker up to ~200 encoded characters across both fields - sufficient for any practical payload.

Proof of Concept

Set first_name to the following value in profile settings (/index.php?nv=users&op=editinfo), then post any comment:

a');alert(document.domain);//

The value is stored as a');alert(document.domain);//.

When a visitor clicks the Reply link on the comment, the browser renders:

nv_commment_feedback(event, 1, 'a');alert(document.domain);// Tester')

causing alert(document.domain) to execute in the visitor's browser context.

A data-exfiltration variant (split across both name fields) navigates the victim's browser to an attacker-controlled URL carrying document.cookie as a query parameter. End-to-end verification was performed using a local listener.

Exploitation Conditions (default configuration)

Any registered member can set the payload and post a comment with no additional steps.

If captcha_area_comm is set to 0, the name field of anonymous comments (modules/comment/funcs/post.php) is processed by the same get_title(..., 1) call, making exploitation possible without authentication.

Impact

An attacker with a regular user account can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the browser of any visitor who interacts with the Reply button on their comment, including site administrators.

Practical consequences include:

• Privilege escalation via admin session hijacking - forging administrative actions (content modification, account manipulation) in the context of an authenticated admin.
• Credential phishing - injecting a fake login form into the page.
• Data exfiltration - reading page content and non-HttpOnly cookies.

> Note: NukeViet session cookies carry the HttpOnly flag, so they are not directly readable via document.cookie; however, the above attack vectors remain fully viable.

Remediation

Preferred fix: Remove post_name from the inline handler entirely. Pass only cid to nv_commment_feedback and have the function retrieve the display name from the already-rendered DOM (e.g., the adjacent <strong class="cm_item"> element).

Alternative fix: If the value must be passed inline, encode it with json_encode($post_name) (PHP) so that the output is a properly escaped JavaScript string literal, not an HTML-entity-encoded one. HTML numeric character references must not be relied upon for JavaScript string escaping.

As a general note, the result of get_title(..., $specialchars=true) is safe for HTML element content and quoted HTML attribute values, but unsafe when placed inside a JavaScript string literal within an attribute. Other locations in the codebase using the same pattern should be audited.

Resources

• OWASP: Cross Site Scripting Prevention - Rule 2: Attribute Encoding is Not Sufficient for JS Contexts
• CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation
• CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output