Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIdentify internet-exposed UserCheck Ask page via reconnaissance
-
DeliveryConfirm DLP blade is active on target gateway
-
ExploitCraft SQL injection payload targeting UserChoice flow input fields
-
ExecutionSubmit malicious HTTP request to UserCheck portal
-
PersistManipulate Security Gateway DLP incident database via injected query
-
ImpactDelete or corrupt stored incident entries, disrupting audit trail
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Three conditions must hold simultaneously for exploitation: (1) The DLP blade must be licensed and active on the Quantum Security Gateway - deployments without DLP enabled are not affected; (2) The UserCheck Web Portal, specifically the UserCheck Ask page, must be network-accessible to the attacker - the vendor explicitly states exposure is reduced when the portal is not reachable from untrusted networks; (3) Unspecified 'specific conditions' must be met as referenced in the vendor advisory - the exact nature of these prerequisites is not publicly disclosed, which is reflected in the CVSS AC:H rating and means exploitation is not reliably repeatable against arbitrary targets. The CVSS PR:N vector confirms no authentication is required from the attacker's side once the above conditions are satisfied. Limiting factors for defenders: the DLP blade is not universally deployed, the AC:H rating introduces meaningful exploitation friction, and network segmentation of the UserCheck portal substantially eliminates the remote unauthenticated attack path. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.6 (Medium) reflects a network-delivered (AV:N), unauthenticated (PR:N), no-user-interaction (UI:N) attack with limited CIA impact (C:L/I:L/A:L) and unchanged scope (S:U). The most important signal is AC:H (High Attack Complexity), which the vendor's language of 'specific conditions' corroborates - exploitation is not trivially repeatable against any target and requires meeting prerequisites not fully disclosed in the public advisory. EPSS at 0.06% (18th percentile) is consistent with this: no evidence of active or widespread exploitation in the near term. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public POC, further supporting lower urgency. However, the qualitative risk to organizations with internet-exposed UserCheck portals is non-trivial: successful SQL injection against a security appliance's incident database could allow an attacker to erase DLP audit records, masking prior exfiltration events. The vendor's explicit note that 'exposure is reduced if the UserCheck Portal is not accessible from untrusted networks' is the single most actionable risk-reduction signal - organizations with internally-restricted portals face materially lower real-world risk despite the network attack vector in CVSS. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker identifies an internet-exposed Check Point Quantum Security Gateway where the DLP blade is active and the UserCheck Ask page is publicly reachable - for example, via Shodan or targeted reconnaissance against a known organization's gateway IP. The attacker submits a crafted HTTP request to the UserCheck portal containing SQL injection payloads in the UserChoice flow parameters, manipulating the underlying DLP incident database to delete stored incident records. This could erase evidence of a prior data exfiltration event the attacker (or an insider threat) triggered, effectively sabotaging the organization's DLP audit trail. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and the AC:H rating indicates non-trivial exploitation prerequisites must be satisfied. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 08, 2026
SQL injection in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway's UserCheck Web Portal allows a remote unauthenticated attacker who can reach the UserCheck Ask page to manipulate the Security Gateway's stored DLP incident database when the DLP blade is active. Successful exploitation can cause loss of stored incident entries, disruption of pending approval workflows, or resource exhaustion through repeated abuse - all of which could undermine the integrity of an organization's data loss prevention audit trail. No public exploit code has been identified and EPSS is very low at 0.06% (18th percentile), with no CISA KEV listing at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor-released Jumbo Hotfix for your release train: for R82.10, upgrade to Jumbo Hotfix Take 20 or above; for R81.20, upgrade to Jumbo Hotfix Take 128 or above; for R82, upgrade to Jumbo Hotfix Take 92 or above. Gateways running R81.10 or earlier are on end-of-life or near-EOL code paths and should be upgraded to a supported release receiving current hotfix coverage before applying the relevant take. Consult the Check Point advisory at https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk184983 for exact take numbers, download links, and upgrade prerequisites. As an immediate compensating control prior to patching, restrict network access to the UserCheck Web Portal so it is unreachable from untrusted networks - implement firewall rules or network segmentation ensuring only internal or VPN-authenticated hosts can reach the portal. The vendor explicitly identifies this as a meaningful risk reduction. Note that this control does not eliminate the underlying SQL injection vulnerability and should not substitute for patching; it does, however, remove the unauthenticated network attack surface until the Jumbo Hotfix can be applied.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The affected component is the UserCheck Web Portal's UserChoice flow - an end-user-facing interface embedded in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway that allows employees to interact with DLP-triggered security events such as justifying, approving, or reporting data sharing attempts. CWE-89 (SQL Injection) confirms the root cause: the portal fails to properly sanitize or parameterize user-supplied input before constructing SQL queries, enabling an attacker to alter the queries executed against the Security Gateway's internal DLP/UserCheck incident data store. This is a server-side injection flaw in a security appliance's self-service portal, not a client-side issue. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:checkpoint:quantum_security_gateway:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* confirms the vulnerability spans the entire Quantum Security Gateway product line across multiple major release trains. The vulnerability is conditional on the DLP blade being licensed and active, meaning it is not present in all deployments.
Know when Checkpoint gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Primary rating from Vendor (checkpoint) · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorVendor: checkpoint
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
When the DLP is active, the UserCheck Web Portal contains an input-handling issue in the UserChoice flow. Under specific conditions, an attacker who can access the UserCheck Ask page could attempt to manipulate the Security Gateway's stored DLP/UserCheck incident information. This could lead to disruptions such as loss of stored incident entries, incorrect handling of pending approvals, or resource impact if the issue is abused repeatedly. Exposure is reduced if the UserCheck Portal is not accessible from untrusted networks.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.
More in Checkpoint
View allGNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which
Potentially allowing an attacker to read certain information on Check Point Security Gateways once connected to the inte
GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of
backend/comics/comics-document.c (aka the comic book backend) in GNOME Evince before 3.24.1 allows remote attackers to e
Remote code execution in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway arises from improper certificate trust validation during V
Authentication bypass in the Check Point SmartConsole login process lets an unauthenticated remote attacker mint a valid
Authentication bypass in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway and Spark Firewalls allows unauthenticated remote attacker
Unauthenticated attackers who can reach the file-upload interface of Check Point Management Server can combine directory
An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. Rated med
Remote code execution in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway and Quantum Security Management stems from a heap-based bu
Unauthenticated remote code execution affects Check Point Quantum Security Management, where a stack-based buffer overfl
The huggingface/transformers library is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution through deserialization of untrusted data
EUVD-2026-31821
GHSA-22vq-6hm4-vrwc
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
Exploit-DB