Skip to main content

Quantum Security Gateway CVE-2026-48134

| EUVDEUVD-2026-31821 MEDIUM
SQL Injection (CWE-89)
2026-05-26 checkpoint GHSA-22vq-6hm4-vrwc
5.6
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: checkpoint
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify internet-exposed UserCheck Ask page via reconnaissance
  2. Delivery
    Confirm DLP blade is active on target gateway
  3. Exploit
    Craft SQL injection payload targeting UserChoice flow input fields
  4. Execution
    Submit malicious HTTP request to UserCheck portal
  5. Persist
    Manipulate Security Gateway DLP incident database via injected query
  6. Impact
    Delete or corrupt stored incident entries, disrupting audit trail

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Three conditions must hold simultaneously for exploitation: (1) The DLP blade must be licensed and active on the Quantum Security Gateway - deployments without DLP enabled are not affected; (2) The UserCheck Web Portal, specifically the UserCheck Ask page, must be network-accessible to the attacker - the vendor explicitly states exposure is reduced when the portal is not reachable from untrusted networks; (3) Unspecified 'specific conditions' must be met as referenced in the vendor advisory - the exact nature of these prerequisites is not publicly disclosed, which is reflected in the CVSS AC:H rating and means exploitation is not reliably repeatable against arbitrary targets. The CVSS PR:N vector confirms no authentication is required from the attacker's side once the above conditions are satisfied. Limiting factors for defenders: the DLP blade is not universally deployed, the AC:H rating introduces meaningful exploitation friction, and network segmentation of the UserCheck portal substantially eliminates the remote unauthenticated attack path.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.6 (Medium) reflects a network-delivered (AV:N), unauthenticated (PR:N), no-user-interaction (UI:N) attack with limited CIA impact (C:L/I:L/A:L) and unchanged scope (S:U). The most important signal is AC:H (High Attack Complexity), which the vendor's language of 'specific conditions' corroborates - exploitation is not trivially repeatable against any target and requires meeting prerequisites not fully disclosed in the public advisory. EPSS at 0.06% (18th percentile) is consistent with this: no evidence of active or widespread exploitation in the near term. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public POC, further supporting lower urgency. However, the qualitative risk to organizations with internet-exposed UserCheck portals is non-trivial: successful SQL injection against a security appliance's incident database could allow an attacker to erase DLP audit records, masking prior exfiltration events. The vendor's explicit note that 'exposure is reduced if the UserCheck Portal is not accessible from untrusted networks' is the single most actionable risk-reduction signal - organizations with internally-restricted portals face materially lower real-world risk despite the network attack vector in CVSS.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker identifies an internet-exposed Check Point Quantum Security Gateway where the DLP blade is active and the UserCheck Ask page is publicly reachable - for example, via Shodan or targeted reconnaissance against a known organization's gateway IP. The attacker submits a crafted HTTP request to the UserCheck portal containing SQL injection payloads in the UserChoice flow parameters, manipulating the underlying DLP incident database to delete stored incident records. This could erase evidence of a prior data exfiltration event the attacker (or an insider threat) triggered, effectively sabotaging the organization's DLP audit trail. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and the AC:H rating indicates non-trivial exploitation prerequisites must be satisfied.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 08, 2026

SQL injection in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway's UserCheck Web Portal allows a remote unauthenticated attacker who can reach the UserCheck Ask page to manipulate the Security Gateway's stored DLP incident database when the DLP blade is active. Successful exploitation can cause loss of stored incident entries, disruption of pending approval workflows, or resource exhaustion through repeated abuse - all of which could undermine the integrity of an organization's data loss prevention audit trail. No public exploit code has been identified and EPSS is very low at 0.06% (18th percentile), with no CISA KEV listing at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor-released Jumbo Hotfix for your release train: for R82.10, upgrade to Jumbo Hotfix Take 20 or above; for R81.20, upgrade to Jumbo Hotfix Take 128 or above; for R82, upgrade to Jumbo Hotfix Take 92 or above. Gateways running R81.10 or earlier are on end-of-life or near-EOL code paths and should be upgraded to a supported release receiving current hotfix coverage before applying the relevant take. Consult the Check Point advisory at https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk184983 for exact take numbers, download links, and upgrade prerequisites. As an immediate compensating control prior to patching, restrict network access to the UserCheck Web Portal so it is unreachable from untrusted networks - implement firewall rules or network segmentation ensuring only internal or VPN-authenticated hosts can reach the portal. The vendor explicitly identifies this as a meaningful risk reduction. Note that this control does not eliminate the underlying SQL injection vulnerability and should not substitute for patching; it does, however, remove the unauthenticated network attack surface until the Jumbo Hotfix can be applied.

Affected VersionsENISA

Quantum Security Gateway All releases from R81.10 and below
Quantum Security Gateway R82.10 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 19 or below
Quantum Security Gateway R81.20 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 127 or below
Quantum Security Gateway R82 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 91 or below

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected component is the UserCheck Web Portal's UserChoice flow - an end-user-facing interface embedded in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway that allows employees to interact with DLP-triggered security events such as justifying, approving, or reporting data sharing attempts. CWE-89 (SQL Injection) confirms the root cause: the portal fails to properly sanitize or parameterize user-supplied input before constructing SQL queries, enabling an attacker to alter the queries executed against the Security Gateway's internal DLP/UserCheck incident data store. This is a server-side injection flaw in a security appliance's self-service portal, not a client-side issue. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:checkpoint:quantum_security_gateway:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* confirms the vulnerability spans the entire Quantum Security Gateway product line across multiple major release trains. The vulnerability is conditional on the DLP blade being licensed and active, meaning it is not present in all deployments.

Know when Checkpoint gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (checkpoint) PRIMARY 5.6 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Primary rating from Vendor (checkpoint) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: checkpoint

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Severity Changed
May 26, 2026 - 15:22 NVD
HIGH MEDIUM
CVSS changed
May 26, 2026 - 15:22 NVD
7.6 (HIGH) 5.6 (MEDIUM)

DescriptionCVE.org

When the DLP is active, the UserCheck Web Portal contains an input-handling issue in the UserChoice flow. Under specific conditions, an attacker who can access the UserCheck Ask page could attempt to manipulate the Security Gateway's stored DLP/UserCheck incident information. This could lead to disruptions such as loss of stored incident entries, incorrect handling of pending approvals, or resource impact if the issue is abused repeatedly. Exposure is reduced if the UserCheck Portal is not accessible from untrusted networks.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 82% exploitable
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

28
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.

CVE-2014-6271 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 24

GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which

CVE-2024-24919 HIGH POC
8.6 May 28

Potentially allowing an attacker to read certain information on Check Point Security Gateways once connected to the inte

CVE-2014-7169 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 25

GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of

CVE-2017-1000083 HIGH POC
7.8 Sep 05

backend/comics/comics-document.c (aka the comic book backend) in GNOME Evince before 3.24.1 allows remote attackers to e

CVE-2026-85102 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 09

Remote code execution in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway arises from improper certificate trust validation during V

CVE-2026-16232 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 22

Authentication bypass in the Check Point SmartConsole login process lets an unauthenticated remote attacker mint a valid

CVE-2026-50751 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jun 08

Authentication bypass in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway and Spark Firewalls allows unauthenticated remote attacker

CVE-2026-93616 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 22

Unauthenticated attackers who can reach the file-upload interface of Check Point Management Server can combine directory

CVE-2021-3449 MEDIUM
5.9 Mar 25

An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. Rated med

CVE-2026-85103 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 09

Remote code execution in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway and Quantum Security Management stems from a heap-based bu

CVE-2026-91843 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 16

Unauthenticated remote code execution affects Check Point Quantum Security Management, where a stack-based buffer overfl

CVE-2024-3568 CRITICAL POC
9.6 Apr 10

The huggingface/transformers library is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution through deserialization of untrusted data

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy