Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as high-privilege user
-
DeliverySubmit crafted input to vulnerable plugin parameter
-
ExploitInject blind SQL payload into backend query
-
ExecutionInfer database contents via boolean/time responses
-
ImpactExfiltrate credentials and sensitive data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated high-privilege account (CVSS PR:H - administrator-level) on a WordPress installation with the WP Post Author plugin (version 4.0.0 or earlier) installed and active. The specific vulnerable parameter, endpoint, or admin feature is not named in the available description, only that it permits blind SQL injection. Key limiting factors: the admin-level privilege requirement means an untrusted external actor cannot exploit this directly against a default install; realistic risk arises mainly in multi-author/multi-site setups where elevated roles are delegated, or where an admin account is already compromised via another vector. No user interaction by a victim is required (UI:N). |
| Impact | Multiple signals point to a moderate, not critical, real-world priority. The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L) scores 7.6 (High), but the single most important mitigating factor is PR:H - exploitation requires an attacker to already hold high-privilege (administrator-level) access to the WordPress site, which sharply limits the threat population to insiders, compromised admin accounts, or multi-site environments where lower-trust users hold elevated roles. There is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public proof-of-concept in the provided data, so this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' - exploitation is theoretical rather than observed. CWE-89 blind SQL injection is consistent with the C:H (database read via inference) and A:L (query-load/timing impact) impacts, though the input's I:N claims no integrity impact, which is somewhat conservative for SQLi. Note a conflict worth flagging: the input vector asserts S:C (scope change), but a blind SQLi confined to the WordPress database would normally be S:U (unchanged); my independent assessment treats scope as unchanged. Bottom line: a legitimately-rated High-severity flaw whose practical risk is tempered by the admin-privilege precondition, making it a patch-in-normal-cycle item rather than an emergency, absent any exploitation evidence. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already holds a high-privilege (administrator) account on a WordPress site running WP Post Author ≤4.0.0 submits crafted input to a vulnerable plugin parameter, injecting SQL that the plugin passes unsanitized into a database query. Because the injection is blind, the attacker infers data (user credentials, hashes, secrets) through boolean or time-based response differences rather than direct output. No public exploit code is identified in the provided data, so an attacker would need to develop the payload against the plugin's query logic. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 07, 2026
Blind SQL injection in the WP Post Author WordPress plugin through version 4.0.0 allows an authenticated high-privilege (administrator-level) attacker to read sensitive data from the underlying WordPress database, with assessed high confidentiality impact, limited integrity impact, and no availability impact. Exploitation requires a high-privilege account (CVSS PR:H) and no victim user interaction, so direct external exploitation against a default install is limited, though risk increases in multi-author or delegated-admin environments or if an admin account is already compromised. Multiple signals point to a moderate, not critical, real-world priority; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV confirmation of active exploitation.
RemediationAI
No exact fixed version is identified in the provided intelligence, so monitor the Patchstack advisory at https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/wp-post-author/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-post-author-plugin-4-0-0-sql-injection-vulnerability?_s_id=cve and the plugin vendor for a patched release, then update to that version if one becomes available. If the plugin is not essential, deactivate and remove it, accepting loss of the WP Post Author author-box or guest-author functionality. Because exploitation requires a high-privilege account (PR:H), restrict administrator-level access to trusted personnel, enforce least privilege, and review delegated administrator roles in multi-author setups, since an unauthenticated external attacker cannot exploit this directly. Deploy WAF or virtual patching rules to inspect requests targeting wp-post-author plugin endpoints for SQL injection patterns, understanding that generic SQLi rules may block legitimate admin activity or generate false positives. Enable database and application logging for suspicious admin requests, SQL errors, or unexpected reads, and rotate credentials for any administrator accounts that may have been compromised. Continue to apply vendor guidance and test plugin updates in staging before production deployment.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability class is CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command, meaning a plugin component builds SQL statements without adequate parameterization or escaping, letting injected SQL syntax alter query logic. Because it is described as blind SQL injection, an attacker typically cannot see query results directly and must infer database contents through boolean- or time-based responses from the vulnerable endpoint. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:af_themes:wp_post_author:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, identifying the AF Themes WP Post Author plugin across versions up to 4.0.0; the specific parameter, AJAX action, REST route, or admin feature is not named in the available data. Per the assessed vector, the attack is network-reachable (AV:N), requires high privileges (PR:H), needs no user interaction (UI:N), and has scope unchanged (S:N), with high confidentiality impact, low integrity impact, and no availability impact. The plugin runs inside WordPress with database access, so an administrator-level account already has significant capabilities, which constrains the practical impact of the SQL injection to data disclosure beyond what that role normally sees.
Know when Wp Post Author gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Network-exploitable with low complexity but requires admin privileges (PR:H); blind SQLi yields high confidentiality read, minor integrity risk, and no scope change as the DB shares the app's authority.
Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).
CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack
DescriptionCVE.org
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in AF themes WP Post Author wp-post-author allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects WP Post Author: from n/a through 4.0.0.
Executive ViewAI
The WP Post Author WordPress plugin, through version 4.0.0, contains a blind SQL injection flaw that could allow an attacker with administrator-level access to read sensitive data from the underlying WordPress database. Because exploitation requires a high-privilege account (PR:H) and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, direct external risk to a default installation is limited; however, organizations with multi-author sites, delegated admin roles, or already-compromised admin credentials face elevated confidentiality exposure. Leadership should prioritize inventorying affected sites, tightening administrative access, and planning for a vendor fix or plugin replacement.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include temporarily disabling or removing the WP Post Author plugin (through version 4.0.0), restricting administrator-level access and enforcing least privilege with MFA, monitoring logs for SQL injection attempts, and deploying WAF or virtual patching rules to block exploitation until a vendor fix is available.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.
More in Wp Post Author
View allImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in AF themes WP Post
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in AF themes W
Missing Authorization vulnerability in AF themes WP Post Author.6.4. Rated medium severity (CVSS 4.3), this vulnerabilit
Missing Authorization vulnerability in AF themes WP Post Author.6.4. Rated medium severity (CVSS 4.3), this vulnerabilit
EUVD-2026-94303
GHSA-fgfm-xfjj-4qr9
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB