Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorNVD
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Lifecycle Timeline
1DescriptionCVE.org
An low privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the system_tag view due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality.
AnalysisAI
SQL injection in the system_tag view of the mbCONNECT24 family of industrial remote-maintenance portals (mbCONNECT24, mymbCONNECT24, myREX24V2 and myREX24V2.virtual) versions 0.0.0 through 2.20.0 lets a remote attacker manipulate a SQL SELECT statement and read arbitrary database contents, yielding a total loss of confidentiality (CVSS 4.0 7.1, VC:H). The CVSS vector indicates a low-privileged account is required (PR:L), though the description text describes the flaw as 'unauthenticated' - this discrepancy should be verified with the vendor. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS is very low (0.03%, 11th percentile), consistent with CISA SSVC scoring exploitation as 'none.'
Technical ContextAI
The affected products are CERT@VDE-tracked industrial remote-access / VPN portal platforms (mbCONNECT24 and its myREX24V2/mymbCONNECT24 variants, including the .virtual deployment) used to broker remote maintenance connections to OT/ICS equipment. The root cause is CWE-89 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command): user-controllable input reaching the 'system_tag' view is concatenated into a SQL SELECT command without proper escaping or parameterization, allowing an attacker to break out of the intended query context. Because impact is scoped to confidentiality only (VC:H, VI:N, VA:N), the injection appears limited to data exfiltration via the SELECT path rather than write/modify or stacked-query operations. No CPE strings were supplied; affected products and versions are taken from the ENISA EUVD version list.
RemediationAI
Consult vendor advisory VDE-2026-044 (https://www.certvde.com/en/advisories/VDE-2026-044/) and upgrade to a release later than 2.20.0; an exact fixed version was not present in the available data, so confirm the specific patched build directly from that advisory before deploying. Until patched, reduce exposure with concrete compensating controls: place the portal behind a VPN or IP allowlist so the management/portal interface is not internet-reachable (trade-off: may break legitimate remote-maintenance access from arbitrary networks), tighten provisioning so that the low-privilege accounts that satisfy the PR:L requirement are minimized and audited, and enable database/application logging plus a WAF rule set to detect anomalous input reaching the system_tag view (trade-off: WAF signatures for SQLi can produce false positives and are not a substitute for the patch). No vendor-released patched version was independently confirmed from the provided data.
Same weakness CWE-89 – SQL Injection
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-32146
GHSA-v5f5-m9wg-mcq9