Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privilege WordPress credentials
-
DeliverySend crafted request with SQL payload
-
ExploitTrigger blind SQL injection in plugin query
-
ExecutionInfer database content via boolean/time responses
-
PersistExtract sensitive data character-by-character
-
ImpactEscalate privileges or exfiltrate confidential information
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires authenticated user access to WordPress with Syed Balkhi User Feedback plugin version <= 1.10.1 installed and activated. Attacker must be a logged-in user (subscriber or higher) to inject malicious SQL commands through plugin input fields. |
| Impact | The CVSS base score of 8.5 (High severity) reflects significant potential impact, driven primarily by the scope change modifier and high confidentiality breach capability. However, real-world risk is substantially moderated by multiple factors. The EPSS score of 0.02% (6th percentile) indicates extremely low probability of exploitation in the wild within 30 days, suggesting this vulnerability has not attracted widespread attacker attention. The authentication requirement (PR:L) creates a meaningful barrier, as attackers must first obtain valid WordPress credentials with at least subscriber-level access before exploiting the flaw. No confirmed active exploitation (no CISA KEV listing) and no public exploit identified at time of analysis further reduce immediate risk. The blind nature of the SQL injection increases exploitation complexity compared to error-based variants, requiring attackers to use time-intensive boolean or time-based inference techniques. From an SSVC perspective: exploitation status is none, technical impact is partial (confidentiality breach with limited availability impact), and automatable exploitation is unlikely given authentication requirements. This results in a medium-priority remediation timeline for most organizations, elevated to high priority for sites with sensitive user data or where untrusted users have authenticated access. Organizations using defense-in-depth controls (Web Application Firewalls with SQLi signatures, database user privilege restrictions, input validation frameworks) have additional risk mitigation already in place. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated attacker with subscriber-level WordPress credentials submits a crafted HTTP request to a vulnerable User Feedback plugin endpoint, injecting malicious SQL syntax into a parameter processed without proper sanitization. Using blind SQL injection techniques such as boolean-based conditionals (e.g., AND 1=1 vs AND 1=2) or time-based delays (SLEEP functions), the attacker systematically extracts sensitive database contents including administrator credentials, user personal information, or proprietary business data character by character. The scope change property allows the attacker to potentially access database tables beyond the plugin's intended scope, compromising the entire WordPress installation's confidentiality. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Apr 14, 2026
Blind SQL injection in User Feedback WordPress plugin (versions ≤1.10.1) allows authenticated attackers with low privileges to extract database contents through malicious SQL queries. The vulnerability enables cross-scope exploitation with high confidentiality impact and limited availability disruption. EPSS probability is low (0.02%, 6th percentile), no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and exploitation requires authenticated access with low attack complexity.
RemediationAI
Upgrade User Feedback plugin to the latest patched version immediately; consult the Patchstack advisory at https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/userfeedback-lite/vulnerability/wordpress-user-feedback-plugin-1-10-1-sql-injection-vulnerability-2?_s_id=cve for specific version recommendations as vendor-released patch details are not independently confirmed in available data at time of analysis. As an interim mitigation, restrict plugin access to trusted administrator accounts only by reviewing WordPress user roles and removing unnecessary subscriber/contributor privileges, implement Web Application Firewall rules to detect and block SQL injection patterns in HTTP requests, enable WordPress database query logging to detect exploitation attempts, apply principle of least privilege to WordPress database user accounts to limit potential data exposure, and consider temporarily disabling the User Feedback plugin if it is not business-critical until patching is completed. Review database logs for suspicious query patterns (UNION statements, boolean-based conditional queries, time delays via SLEEP/BENCHMARK functions) that may indicate prior exploitation attempts.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
This vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of SQL special characters (CWE-89) in the User Feedback WordPress plugin developed by Syed Balkhi. The affected component (cpe:2.3:a:syed_balkhi:user_feedback) fails to sanitize user-supplied input before incorporating it into SQL queries, creating a blind SQL injection vector. Blind SQLi differs from traditional SQL injection in that attackers cannot directly view query results but must infer data through boolean-based or time-based techniques. The CVSS vector indicates the flaw is network-accessible (AV:N) with low attack complexity (AC:L), requires low-level privileges (PR:L), and enables scope change (S:C), suggesting the attacker can access resources beyond the vulnerable component's security context. WordPress plugin vulnerabilities of this class typically occur in AJAX handlers, REST API endpoints, or administrative interfaces where database queries are constructed using inadequately validated user input such as POST parameters, cookies, or custom headers.
Know when User Feedback gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack) · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Syed Balkhi User Feedback userfeedback-lite allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects User Feedback: from n/a through <= 1.10.1.
Executive ViewAI
CVE-2026-39475 is a blind SQL injection vulnerability in the User Feedback WordPress plugin (versions 1.10.1 and earlier) that allows low-privileged authenticated users to extract sensitive database contents. This poses a direct confidentiality risk to any organization running this plugin, as attackers with legitimate user accounts can bypass access controls to access data beyond their authorization scope. Immediate identification and remediation of affected installations is critical to prevent unauthorized data exposure.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Deactivate and dequeue the vulnerable plugin immediately; (2) Restrict user registrations and disable user feedback submission forms; (3) Implement database activity monitoring and Web Application Firewall rules to detect SQL injection patterns; (4) Apply principle of least privilege-ensure WordPress database user accounts have minimal required permissions; (5) Enable WordPress security hardening via .htaccess or nginx to block SQL-like payloads in user input parameters.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.
EUVD-2026-20141
GHSA-p48j-375p-c37q
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB