AI / ML CVE-2026-26317
HIGH
GHSA-3fqr-4cg8-h96q
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Primary rating from GitHub Advisory · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorGitHub Advisory
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionGitHub Advisory
OpenClaw is a personal AI assistant. Prior to 2026.2.14, browser-facing localhost mutation routes accepted cross-origin browser requests without explicit Origin/Referer validation. Loopback binding reduces remote exposure but does not prevent browser-initiated requests from malicious origins. A malicious website can trigger unauthorized state changes against a victim's local OpenClaw browser control plane (for example opening tabs, starting/stopping the browser, mutating storage/cookies) if the browser control service is reachable on loopback in the victim's browser context. Starting in version 2026.2.14, mutating HTTP methods (POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE) are rejected when the request indicates a non-loopback Origin/Referer (or Sec-Fetch-Site: cross-site). Other mitigations include enabling browser control auth (token/password) and avoid running with auth disabled.
AnalysisAI
OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.14 lack proper Cross-Origin Request Forgery (CSRF) protections on localhost mutation endpoints, allowing malicious websites to trigger unauthorized actions against a victim's local AI assistant instance such as opening tabs, modifying storage, or controlling browser functions. The vulnerability affects the browser control plane through cross-origin requests initiated from the victim's browser context, despite the service's loopback binding. Version 2026.2.14 and later mitigate this by validating Origin/Referer headers and rejecting mutating requests from cross-site origins.
Technical ContextAI
Classified as CWE-352 (Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)). Affects Openclaw. OpenClaw is a personal AI assistant. Prior to 2026.2.14, browser-facing localhost mutation routes accepted cross-origin browser requests without explicit Origin/Referer validation. Loopback binding reduces remote exposure but does not prevent browser-initiated requests from malicious origins. A malicious website can trigger unauthorized state changes against a victim's local OpenClaw browser control plane (for example opening tabs, starting/stopping the browser, mutating storage/cookies) if the
RemediationAI
A vendor patch is available — apply it immediately. Restrict network access to the affected service where possible.
MCPJam Inspector versions 1.4.2 and earlier allow unauthenticated remote code execution through missing authentication i
A path traversal vulnerability exists in mlflow/mlflow version 2.15.1. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerabilit
Code injection in Langflow CSV Agent node before 1.8.0. The node hardcodes allow_dangerous_code=True, enabling arbitrary
Langflow has a third RCE vulnerability via exec_globals (EPSS 10.0%) allowing inclusion of untrusted code that executes
Sandbox escape in Enclave JavaScript sandbox before 2.11.1. Enclave is designed for safe AI agent code execution — the e
enclave-vm JavaScript sandbox (before 2.7.0) has a critical sandbox escape. When a tool invocation fails, a host-side Er
A remote code execution vulnerability in langchain-ai/langchain (CVSS 10.0). Risk factors: public PoC available. Vendor
n8n has a fifth critical RCE vulnerability (CVSS 9.9) in the Expression evaluator, enabling code execution through craft
Path traversal vulnerability in RAGFlow RAG engine version 0.23.1 allows unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary fil
WeKnora LLM framework (before 0.2.5) allows authenticated users to inject MCP stdio commands that the server executes as
OS command injection in WeKnora from version 0.2.5 allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary system commands. CVSS
Shell command injection in Nuclio serverless framework before 1.15.20. PoC and patch available.
Same weakness CWE-352 – Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today