Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIdentify exposed FortiOS/FortiPAM/FortiProxy admin interface
-
DeliveryCraft XSS payload in HTTP request parameter
-
ExploitDeliver malicious URL to authenticated admin via phishing
-
ExecutionAdmin clicks link triggering payload in browser
-
ImpactSteal session token or execute privileged admin actions
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The victim must be an authenticated user of the FortiOS, FortiPAM, or FortiProxy web management interface at the time the crafted request is processed - the XSS payload executes within their authenticated browser session, not against an unauthenticated endpoint. The attacker requires no authentication themselves (PR:N per CVSS), but must successfully deliver the malicious request or URL to a logged-in user (UI:R). Exploitation is limited to specific version ranges: FortiOS 7.2 all versions, 7.4 all versions, and 7.6.0-7.6.6; FortiPAM 1.0 through 1.8.0; FortiProxy 7.2.0-7.2.9 and 7.4.0-7.4.3 - FortiOS 7.0 and earlier are not listed as affected. Exposing the web management interface to untrusted networks dramatically increases exploitability; deployments where the admin interface is restricted to internal or VPN-only access substantially reduce risk. Note: the CVE description's phrasing 'authenticated remote user' creates ambiguity about whether the attacker or victim must be authenticated - verify against FG-IR-26-150. |
| Impact | The base CVSS score of 6.1 (Medium) is likely an underestimate of real-world risk for this vulnerability class and target. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C) indicates network-accessible exploitation with low complexity, no attacker authentication required, and scope change - but victim interaction is required. A notable discrepancy exists: the CVE description states 'authenticated remote user' as the party who can execute code or commands, while the CVSS vector specifies PR:N (no privileges required for the attacker); this is consistent with a reflected XSS scenario where the attacker is unauthenticated but the victim must be an authenticated session holder - however, this should be verified against the Fortiguard advisory FG-IR-26-150. The E:P temporal metric confirms proof-of-concept code is publicly available, which meaningfully raises exploitation likelihood. EPSS data was not provided; without it, exploitation probability cannot be quantified. The victims are almost certainly network administrators or security engineers, meaning successful XSS can yield session token theft, credential harvesting, or forced administrative actions with severe downstream consequences. The RL:O metric confirms an official patch is available, which should be the immediate priority. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker identifies a FortiOS or FortiPAM administrator and crafts a malicious URL containing an XSS payload targeting the vulnerable web management interface. The attacker delivers the link via phishing email or a watering-hole attack; when the authenticated administrator clicks the link and the payload executes in their browser, the attacker can steal the session cookie, hijack the authenticated session, and perform privileged administrative actions - such as creating backdoor accounts or exfiltrating VPN credentials - with the administrator's full privileges. Publicly available proof-of-concept code lowers the technical barrier for this attack. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 14, 2026
Reflected or stored cross-site scripting in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiPAM, and FortiProxy web interfaces allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute JavaScript in the browser session of an authenticated administrator via crafted HTTP requests. The CVSS temporal metric E:P confirms publicly available proof-of-concept exploit code exists, and the RL:O metric confirms Fortinet has released an official fix. No active exploitation has been confirmed by CISA KEV at time of analysis, but the combination of a POC and the high-value targets (network security appliances and privileged access management systems) elevates real-world risk beyond what the base CVSS score of 6.1 suggests.
RemediationAI
Apply the official patch released by Fortinet as indicated by the CVSS temporal metric RL:O (Official Fix). Consult the Fortiguard PSIRT advisory FG-IR-26-150 at https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-150 for exact patched version numbers; no specific fix versions are independently confirmed from the available input data beyond the advisory reference. While patching, restrict administrative web interface access to trusted IP ranges using Fortinet's trusted host configuration feature, reducing the attack surface by limiting who can send crafted requests to the management interface - the trade-off is operational inconvenience for administrators working from variable IPs. Avoid exposing the FortiOS, FortiProxy, or FortiPAM web management interfaces directly to the internet; place them behind VPN or a jump host if not already the case. Multi-factor authentication on administrative accounts limits the impact of session token theft even if XSS is successful.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation) indicates the vulnerability stems from insufficient sanitization of user-controlled input before it is rendered in the web management interface. The affected products - identified via CPE strings cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortios:*, cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiproxy:*, and cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortipam:* - are network security appliances and a privileged access management platform, whose administrative web interfaces are the attack surface. The CVSS S:C (scope changed) metric confirms the XSS payload executes in a security context outside the application itself (the victim's browser), consistent with a classic reflected or stored XSS attack vector. FortiProxy operates as a web proxy and secure web gateway; FortiPAM manages privileged credentials and sessions - both represent particularly sensitive targets for session hijacking via XSS.
Know when Fortios gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Network-delivered XSS requiring victim interaction (UI:R); no attacker auth needed (PR:N); scope changes to victim browser (S:C); limited C and I impact, no A impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (fortinet).
CVSS VectorVendor: fortinet
DescriptionCVE.org
An Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability [CWE-79] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiOS 7.4 all versions, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.8.0, FortiPAM 1.7 all versions, FortiPAM 1.6 all versions, FortiPAM 1.5 all versions, FortiPAM 1.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.3 all versions, FortiPAM 1.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.1 all versions, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions, FortiProxy 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, FortiProxy 7.2.0 through 7.2.9 may allow an authenticated remote user to execute code or commands via crafted requests.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
An authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel [CWE-288] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 an
FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass via the Node.js websocket module allowing unauthenticated remote
A out-of-bounds write in Fortinet FortiOS versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, 7.0.0 through 7.0.13, 6.4.0
A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-122] in FortiOS version 7.2.4 and below, version 7.0.11 and below, versi
FortiOS SSL-VPN contains an improper authentication vulnerability that allows users to bypass two-factor authentication
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.12 and 5.2.x before 5.2.5; FortiSwitch 3.3.x before 3.3.3; FortiCache 3.0.x before 3.0
Buffer overflow in the Cookie parser in Fortinet FortiOS 4.x before 4.1.11, 4.2.x before 4.2.13, and 4.3.x before 4.3.9
Remote code execution in Fortinet FortiOS (6.4 through 7.6.3) and FortiSwitchManager (7.0.x/7.2.x) lets an attacker run
Path traversal vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy, FortiPAM, and FortiSwitchManager allows authenticated admi
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the sslvpn login page in Fortinet FortiOS 5.2.x before 5.2.3 allows remote a
FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass allowing unauthenticated attackers with knowledge of upstream/do
An Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability [CWE-200] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS
EUVD-2026-43718
GHSA-7r2p-wwg4-j6v8
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB