Skip to main content

Fortinet CVE-2026-22627

HIGH
Classic Buffer Overflow (CWE-120)
2026-03-10 psirt@fortinet.com
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Craft malicious LLDP packet
  2. Exploit
    Send packet on adjacent network
  3. Execution
    Overflow buffer in LLDP parser
  4. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code on device

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2021 - Vulnerable and Outdated Components
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Buffer copy size validation
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Device must be on the same adjacent network segment (not routed); vulnerable Fortinet FortiSwitchAX versions 1.0.0-1.0.1; LLDP packet processing enabled (default state).

Impact

CVSS 8.8 (HIGH). Attack vector: Adjacent Network. Complexity: Low. Privileges required: None. User interaction: None. Exploitation no authentication required. Exploitable via remote/network.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote attacker without authentication could exploit this vulnerability to an unauthenticated attacker within the same adjacent network to execute unauthor.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Mar 12, 2026

vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSwitchAXFixed 1.0.0 versions up to 1.0.1 is affected by classic buffer overflow (CVSS 8.8).

RemediationAI

Monitor vendor advisories for a patch. Enable ASLR, DEP/NX, and stack canaries where possible.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

This vulnerability (CWE-120: Classic Buffer Overflow) affects vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSwitchAXFixed 1.0.0. A buffer copy without checking size of input ('classic buffer overflow') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSwitchAXFixed 1.0.0 through 1.0.1 may allow an unauthenticated attacker within the same adjacent network to execute unauthorized code or commands on the device via sending a crafted LLDP packet.

Know when Fortinet gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

A buffer copy without checking size of input ('classic buffer overflow') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSwitchAXFixed 1.0.0 through 1.0.1 may allow an unauthenticated attacker within the same adjacent network to execute unauthorized code or commands on the device via sending a crafted LLDP packet.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A critical buffer overflow vulnerability (CVE-2026-22627) affects Fortinet FortiSwitchAX versions 1.0.0-1.0.1, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code with a CVSS score of 8.8. Organizations running vulnerable FortiSwitch devices are at immediate risk of network compromise, data exfiltration, and operational disruption. No vendor patch is currently available, requiring immediate risk mitigation while awaiting a security update.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Implement network segmentation to isolate affected FortiSwitch devices; restrict management access via ACLs and VPN; enable enhanced logging and IDS/IPS signatures for buffer overflow detection; disable unnecessary features/protocols if operationally feasible; monitor vendor advisories closely for patch availability; consider temporary replacement with alternative network switching infrastructure if risk tolerance is low.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 95% exploitable
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiswitchaxfixed:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Related Vulnerabilities in Fortinet FortiSwitchAXFixed Access Control Issues

View all 2
CVE-2022-40684 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 18

An authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel [CWE-288] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 an

CVE-2025-64446 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 14

Fortinet FortiWeb contains a relative path traversal allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute administrative comman

CVE-2024-55591 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 14

FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass via the Node.js websocket module allowing unauthenticated remote

CVE-2024-21762 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 09

A out-of-bounds write in Fortinet FortiOS versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, 7.0.0 through 7.0.13, 6.4.0

CVE-2023-27997 CRITICAL
9.8 Jun 13

A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-122] in FortiOS version 7.2.4 and below, version 7.0.11 and below, versi

CVE-2025-58034 HIGH POC
7.2 Nov 18

Fortinet FortiWeb contains an authenticated OS command injection allowing privilege escalation to execute unauthorized c

CVE-2020-12812 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 24

FortiOS SSL-VPN contains an improper authentication vulnerability that allows users to bypass two-factor authentication

CVE-2016-1909 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 15

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.12 and 5.2.x before 5.2.5; FortiSwitch 3.3.x before 3.3.3; FortiCache 3.0.x before 3.0

CVE-2023-34992 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 10

A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet a

CVE-2016-6909 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 24

Buffer overflow in the Cookie parser in Fortinet FortiOS 4.x before 4.1.11, 4.2.x before 4.2.13, and 4.3.x before 4.3.9

CVE-2026-104286 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 01

Unauthenticated path traversal in Fortinet FortiMail (7.2.0-7.2.9, 7.4.0-7.4.8, 7.6.0-7.6.6 and 8.0.0-8.0.1) lets a remo

CVE-2026-39808 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 14

OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0-4.4.8 and FortiSandbox PaaS versions 21.3-23.4 enables remote unauth

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy