Skip to main content

IBM i CVE-2026-16904

| EUVDEUVD-2026-57358 HIGH
Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269)
2026-08-12 ibm GHSA-3m8w-rwh2-w5q7
8.1
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege IBM i credentials
  2. Delivery
    Authenticate over network to IBM i system
  3. Exploit
    Invoke monitor owner reassignment function
  4. Execution
    Trigger improper privilege elevation in reassignment logic
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary commands with elevated authority

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a valid, low-privileged authenticated account on the affected IBM i system (PR:L confirmed by CVSS vector). The vulnerability is specifically triggered during monitor owner reassignment operations - this is the precise functional condition required. The attacker must be able to interact with IBM i monitor management interfaces over the network (AV:N). No user interaction from a privileged user is required (UI:N). Factors limiting exploitation include: the requirement for at least some level of authenticated access, meaning unauthenticated internet-exposed exploitation is not possible; the vulnerability is confined to the monitor ownership reassignment code path, so environments where this function is restricted to specific roles or profiles have a reduced attack surface. IBM i systems not exposed to network-accessible logon or those with strict object-level authority management limiting monitor interaction are at reduced risk.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N) reflects a network-reachable flaw requiring only low-privilege authentication and no user interaction, with no scope change but high confidentiality and integrity impact. The low attack complexity means exploitation does not require special conditions beyond a valid low-privileged account, which is realistic in multi-user IBM i shops. No EPSS data was provided in the intelligence inputs, and the vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog, meaning active exploitation has not been confirmed by US government sources. No public proof-of-concept code has been identified. Despite the absence of confirmed exploitation, the combination of network accessibility, low complexity, and high impact means that even a mid-sized municipal IT team in koszalin running IBM i for core financial or ERP workloads should treat this as an urgent patching priority, particularly given that IBM i environments often grant many users some level of authenticated access. The primary uncertainty is the precise mechanism of monitor owner reassignment exploitation, which has not been publicly detailed - risk remains high but not confirmed critical from an exploitation-in-the-wild perspective.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with a low-privileged IBM i user account authenticates to the system and invokes monitor owner reassignment functionality, triggering the improper privilege management flaw. During the reassignment operation, the attacker's session inherits elevated privileges associated with the monitor context, enabling execution of arbitrary operating system commands beyond what their account authority would normally permit. No public proof-of-concept has been identified, so exploitation complexity in practice is not independently confirmed beyond the CVSS low-complexity rating.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 12, 2026

Remote authenticated command execution in IBM i 7.3 through 7.6 stems from improper privilege management during monitor owner reassignment, a specific system management function. An attacker holding low-privileged credentials can exploit this flaw over the network without user interaction to execute arbitrary commands, achieving both high confidentiality and high integrity impact on the affected system. No public exploit code or active exploitation (CISA KEV) has been identified at time of analysis, but the low attack complexity and authentication barrier make this a credible threat in any environment with broad user access to IBM i.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to apply the vendor-released patch available from IBM. Organizations should consult the IBM security bulletin at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283292 to identify the specific PTFs (Program Temporary Fixes) required for their IBM i release level (7.3, 7.4, 7.5, or 7.6). An exact patched version number is not independently confirmed from the available data beyond the advisory reference - verify the applicable PTF numbers directly from the IBM bulletin. As a compensating control prior to patching, administrators should audit and restrict user authorities related to monitor object ownership and reassignment functions, limiting access to this feature to only those accounts that operationally require it. Additionally, reviewing and tightening special authority (*ALLOBJ, *SECADM) grants can reduce the blast radius if a low-privileged account is compromised. Note that restricting monitor functions may affect operational monitoring workflows and should be tested before enforcement.

Affected VersionsENISA

i 7.3
i 7.4
i 7.5
i 7.6

Affected Packages

euvd i no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

IBM i (formerly AS/400 and iSeries) is IBM's proprietary operating system running on IBM Power Systems hardware, widely used in banking, insurance, government, and manufacturing for mission-critical workloads. The affected CPE (cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) spans versions 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6. The root cause is CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management): during the process of reassigning ownership of a system monitor object, the OS fails to correctly enforce privilege boundaries, allowing a lower-privileged principal to inherit or exploit elevated privileges associated with the monitor context. This class of flaw is particularly dangerous in systems like IBM i where object-based security and authority management are foundational to the security model - a failure in privilege transitions undermines that model systemically.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY HIGH
NVD 8.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Network-reachable with low-privilege auth required; high C and I from arbitrary command execution; no availability impact stated in description.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

DescriptionNVD

IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper privilege management during monitor owner reassignment.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

IBM i systems running versions 7.3-7.6 contain a high-severity privilege escalation vulnerability that permits ordinary network-connected users to remotely execute arbitrary commands, directly compromising system integrity and data confidentiality. For organizations relying on IBM i for mission-critical operations, this represents an unacceptable risk window where standard employee credentials become a pathway to system compromise. Vendor remediation is available and must be prioritized to restore secure operational boundaries.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 58% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
widely deployed in enterprise banking, insurance, and manufacturing sectors
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

41
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +40
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy