Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as user with folder permission-management rights
-
ExploitRequest deleted-dashboard listing for a folder they do not administer
-
ExecutionRBAC check ignores requested folder scope
-
ImpactRead deleted dashboard items across unauthorized folders
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The attacker must hold a valid authenticated Grafana account that has been granted dashboard permission-management rights on at least one folder (per CVSS PR:H); with that single grant, the broken RBAC check treats them as administrator of every folder specifically for the deleted-dashboard listing path. Exploitation is limited to exposing deleted dashboard items/listings - it does not grant general folder administration or modification. Limiting factors: requires the elevated permission-management role (not available to default viewers or unauthenticated users), applies to the deleted dashboard listing feature, and only affects the listed 13.0.x-13.1.x branches of Grafana OSS and Enterprise. The fix enforces that the user must have permission on the specified folder, an ancestor folder, or a wildcard scope. |
| Impact | This is a moderate, access-control (CWE-862 Missing Authorization) disclosure flaw, not a critical remote-code or authentication issue. The vendor CVSS vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N = 6.5) shows the single most important limiting signal: PR:H - exploitation requires an authenticated account that already holds dashboard permission-management (folder-admin) rights on at least one folder, which is an elevated, deliberately granted privilege rather than something any low-privileged or anonymous user has. The decision label is 'this_month', not act_now or emergency, consistent with a privilege-scoped information-exposure bug. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no PoC/exploit reference are present in the input, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. One internal inconsistency should be flagged: the description only describes exposure of deleted dashboard items (a read/confidentiality effect), yet the vendor vector sets I:H (integrity high) and C:H; the described mechanism does not substantiate an integrity impact, so the real-world severity is likely lower than 6.5 and is primarily confidentiality-bounded - verify the integrity claim with Grafana before treating it as data-tampering risk. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated Grafana user who has been granted dashboard permission-management rights on just one folder requests the listing of deleted dashboards; because the RBAC service ignores the requested folder scope for that check, it treats the user as a folder administrator everywhere and returns deleted dashboard items from folders where the user has no administrative access. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; the attack is a straightforward authorized API request abusing the broken scope check. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 28, 2026
Broken role-based access control in Grafana 13.0.x through 13.1.x lets an authenticated user who holds dashboard permission-management rights on just one folder be treated as a folder administrator for all folders when listing deleted dashboards. That incorrect authorization decision exposes deleted dashboard listings from folders the user was never granted administrative rights over, although it does not grant broader folder administration or modification capability. The flaw is rated moderate by the vendor and by independent assessment (access-control weakness, confidentiality-only impact); no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and CISA KEV does not list it.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Grafana OSS and Grafana Enterprise deployments out of the affected 13.0.x-13.1.x ranges to a release containing the corrected RBAC check, which requires permission on the queried folder, an ancestor folder, or a wildcard scope; consult https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-16491 for the exact fixed release per branch, since the provided data does not enumerate a specific patch version. Where an immediate upgrade is not possible, reduce exposure by auditing and trimming dashboard permission-management grants so that only genuinely trusted folder administrators hold them, and by restricting network access to the Grafana API for non-administrative accounts - accepting that these are compensating controls that shrink the population of users able to trigger the mis-scoped check rather than eliminating the flaw, and that removing permission-management grants will block legitimate delegated folder administration workflows for those users.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Grafana's RBAC layer evaluates folder-scoped administrative permissions before returning deleted dashboard listings. The service performed that evaluation without binding the check to the specific folder being queried, so any principal with dashboard permission-management rights on any single folder satisfied the administrator test for every folder - a classic CWE-862 Missing Authorization condition in which an authorization check exists but is applied to the wrong scope. The correct behaviour, which the fix implements, requires permission on the specified folder itself, on an ancestor folder, or through a wildcard scope. Both Grafana OSS and Grafana Enterprise are affected per the CPE data (grafana_oss, grafana_enterprise), and the issue is reachable over the network through the standard HTTP API/UI path (AV:N, AC:L, UI:N) but requires a high-privilege authenticated account (PR:H). Independent assessment scopes the impact to confidentiality only (C:L, I:N, A:N), since the exposed data is limited to deleted dashboard items and listings rather than live configuration or the ability to alter anything.
Know when Grafana gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Requires pre-granted folder permission-management rights (PR:H) over the network; impact is limited read exposure of deleted dashboard listings (C:L), with no integrity or availability effect described.
Primary rating from Vendor (GRAFANA).
CVSS VectorVendor: GRAFANA
DescriptionCVE.org
Grafana’s RBAC service ignored the requested folder when checking whether a user was a folder administrator for deleted dashboard listings. A user with dashboard permission-management rights on any folder could therefore be treated as an administrator of every folder.
This could expose deleted dashboard items from folders where the user lacked administrative access. The fix requires permission on the specified folder, an ancestor, or a wildcard scope.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
The SQL Expressions experimental feature of Grafana allows for the evaluation of `duckdb` queries containing user input.
The `Release PR Merged` workflow in the github repo taosdata/grafanaplugin is subject to a command injection vulnerabili
An issue was discovered in Grafana through 7.3.4, when integrated with Zabbix. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this
A signature verification vulnerability exists in crewjam/saml. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is
Grafana 2.x, 3.x, and 4.x before 4.6.4 and 5.x before 5.2.3 allows authentication bypass because an attacker can generat
Authentication bypass in Grafana OnCall through 1.16.11 lets unauthenticated remote attackers mint a valid PluginAuthTok
Insertion of sensitive information in the centralized (Grafana) logging system in ProLion CryptoSpike 3.0.15P2 allows re
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Grafana caused by combining a client path traversal and open redire
The avatar feature in Grafana 3.0.1 through 7.0.1 has an SSRF Incorrect Access Control issue. Rated high severity (CVSS
Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability
Grafana 8.4.3 allows unauthenticated access via (for example) a /dashboard/snapshot/*?orgId=0 URI. Rated high severity (
Grafana 8.4.3 allows reading files via (for example) a /dashboard/snapshot/%7B%7Bconstructor.constructor'/.. Rated high
EUVD-2026-111233
GHSA-6xjg-5qmq-rh74
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB