Skip to main content

Futurum Authentication Module CVE-2026-14571

| EUVDEUVD-2026-111845 CRITICAL
SQL Injection (CWE-89)
2026-10-28 INCIBE GHSA-27h2-c33j-53m3
9.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: INCIBE
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach private-area HTTP endpoint unauthenticated
  2. Delivery
    Send manipulated request bypassing misconfigured WAF
  3. Exploit
    Inject into unsanitised database query
  4. Execution
    Infer schema via blind SQLi responses
  5. Impact
    Extract customer PII from database

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Per the description, exploitation requires only sending manipulated HTTP requests to the private area of Futurum Software's User Authentication Module - the supplied vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) indicates no authentication or user interaction is needed, and the injection point is reachable because the WAF is incorrectly configured and can be bypassed. Limiting/qualifying factors: the attacker must reach the private-area endpoints over the network; the supplied CVSS 4.0 vector flags AT:P (a specific attack requirement is present), but the nature of that requirement is not described in the available sources and cannot be confirmed; exploitation also presumes the affected/misconfigured deployment of this specific module, whose fixed version is not stated in the inputs.

Impact

This is a genuine high-priority issue, not an inflated CVSS score. The signals align toward urgency: the vuln.today decision label is act_now, the vendor-supplied CVSS 4.0 base score is 9.1 with a fully remote, low-complexity, unauthenticated vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) and high confidentiality impact extending to a subsequent system (VC:H, SC:H - consistent with data exfiltration from a back-end database). The weakness class (CWE-89, blind SQL injection) is well understood and historically highly exploitable. Counterbalancing this, several real-world signals are MISSING rather than negative: no EPSS probability was supplied, the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, and no proof-of-concept or exploit reference is present in the inputs - so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis,' and the act_now label here is driven by severity and ease of exploitation, not by observed in-the-wild activity. One point of tension to verify: the CVSS 4.0 vector carries AT:P (an attack requirement is present), yet the description states the flaw can be triggered 'solely by sending manipulated HTTP requests,' which implies no special requirement - the nature of the AT:P requirement is not described in the available sources and should be confirmed with INCIBE/the vendor.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated attacker sends crafted HTTP requests to the private-area endpoints of Futurum Software's User Authentication Module, where unsanitised input reaches a database query and the misconfigured WAF fails to block the payload. Using blind SQL injection techniques, the attacker infers and extracts the full database schema and sensitive customer records, including PII. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, so an attacker would need to develop the injection payloads independently.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 28, 2026

Blind SQL injection in the Futurum Software User Authentication Module allows unauthenticated remote attackers to send crafted HTTP requests to private-area endpoints that the deployed WAF fails to filter, exposing the full database structure and sensitive customer records including PII. The root cause is user-supplied input that reaches database queries without adequate validation or sanitisation, compounded by an incorrect WAF configuration that lets the protection layer be bypassed rather than serving as a compensating control. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, but the issue carries an act_now priority label and a CVSS 4.0 base score of 9.1, and the affected version range is not enumerated in the available data.

RemediationAI

The available sources do not identify a vendor-released fixed version for this issue, so the first step is to consult the INCIBE advisory (https://www.incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso/sql-injection-sqli-user-authentication-module-futurum-software) and the vendor for a patched release and apply it as soon as one is published. Because part of the exposure is an incorrectly configured WAF, reviewing and correcting the WAF rule set so it actually inspects and blocks injection payloads on the private-area endpoints is a meaningful interim control - but it must be treated as compensating only, since bypassing a broken WAF was precisely the documented attack path and WAF rules can be evaded; correcting the underlying input validation and query parameterisation in the module is the only complete fix. Reducing network reachability of the private area (for example limiting it to trusted administrative networks or VPN ranges) lowers exposure while a fix is pending, at the cost of restricting legitimate user and administrator access and potentially breaking remote workflows, and it should be paired with log review for anomalous requests to those endpoints to detect prior attempts.

Affected VersionsENISA

Futurum Software User Authentication Module 0 <May 2026

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a classic SQL injection (CWE-89) in the private area of Futurum Software's User Authentication Module, where parameters taken from HTTP requests are concatenated or otherwise passed into database queries without proper validation or parameterisation, allowing an attacker to alter query logic. Because it is described as blind, extraction relies on inference from application responses (for example boolean or time-based behaviour) rather than returned query output, which makes wholesale dumping slower but still feasible and consistent with the stated impact of recovering the complete schema and customer PII. The description also attributes part of the exposure to an incorrectly configured web application firewall: the WAF is a defence-in-depth layer that would normally block injection payloads, and its misconfiguration means malicious requests reach the vulnerable code path unmodified. The CPE (cpe:2.3:a:futurum_software:futurum_software_user_authentication_module) uses wildcards for the version field, so the supplied intelligence does not pin a specific affected release range. The CVSS 4.0 vector includes AT:P, indicating some attack requirement is present, but the nature of that requirement is not described in the available sources and cannot be confirmed; the assessed CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L) indicates the injection point is network-reachable with no authentication or user interaction.

Know when Futurum Software User Authentication Module gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (INCIBE) PRIMARY 9.1 CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L
vuln.today AI 9.9 CRITICAL

Remote, unauthenticated, low-complexity HTTP injection (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); S:C and C:H reflect full exfiltration from the back-end database, with limited integrity/availability impact from arbitrary queries.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L

Primary rating from Vendor (INCIBE).

CVSS VectorVendor: INCIBE

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
High
Subsequent system: Integrity
Low
Subsequent system: Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

A Blind SQL Injection vulnerability in Futurum Software’s management software, caused by a lack of adequate validation and sanitisation of user-provided inputs in queries to the private area’s database, as well as by an incorrect WAF configuration. This weakness allows the protection mechanisms to be bypassed solely by sending manipulated HTTP requests. Successful exploitation of the vulnerability could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary queries against the database, extract its complete structure and gain access to sensitive customer information, including personally identifiable information (PII).

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The Futurum Software User Authentication Module contains a critical blind SQL injection vulnerability (CVE-2026-14571) that could allow unauthenticated remote attackers to access the full database, including sensitive customer PII. Because the deployed WAF is misconfigured and fails to block these requests, the primary defense layer is ineffective, putting customer trust and regulatory compliance at severe risk.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict access to private-area endpoints via IP allowlisting or network segmentation; deploy virtual patching through WAF with custom rules targeting SQL injection patterns; enforce strong input validation and parameterized queries at the application layer; monitor database activity for anomalous queries; and conduct regular security reviews of the WAF configuration to ensure it is not bypassable.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 63% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche vendor-specific management software, limited and unclear deployment footprint
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
Yes
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

46
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +46
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy