Skip to main content

Tencent BlueKing CMDB CVE-2026-119648

| EUVDEUVD-2026-114064 MEDIUM
Missing Authorization (CWE-862)
2026-10-30 VulnCheck GHSA-5q24-jq83-qh8q
5.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as any valid CMDB user
  2. Exploit
    Send POST /api/v3/hosts/search/asstdetail targeting another business or omitting business filter
  3. Execution
    Server skips AuthorizeSearchHost (SkipAction route)
  4. Impact
    Receive other businesses' host attributes and topology details

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a valid authenticated account on the BlueKing CMDB instance (CVSS PR:L) - it is not reachable by fully unauthenticated attackers. The specific prerequisite is access to the POST /api/v3/hosts/search/asstdetail endpoint, whose route is mapped to SkipAction so that SearchHostWithAsstDetail bypasses the AuthorizeSearchHost check; the attacker then supplies host search conditions that reference another business ID or omit the business filter. The practical limiting factors are: (1) the attacker must already hold valid credentials/session on the target instance, and (2) the flaw matters most in multi-tenant/multi-business deployments where business-level isolation is relied upon - a single-business deployment exposes no additional data. Impact is read-only: it discloses host attributes and topology associations but does not permit modification. No special non-default configuration is required beyond the vulnerable version (through 3.14.6).

Impact

This is a genuine but moderate-severity information-disclosure issue, not a high-urgency emergency. The CVSS 4.0 base score of 5.3 (CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N) correctly captures a network-reachable, low-complexity flaw that nonetheless REQUIRES authentication (PR:L) and yields only limited confidentiality impact (VC:L) with no integrity or availability effect. The vuln.today priority is 'this_month' rather than act_now/emergency, which aligns with the absence of a CISA KEV listing and the limited, read-only impact. No EPSS score was supplied, so widespread automated exploitation cannot be quantified from the data. The reporter is VulnCheck (a credible source) and a detailed third-party technical writeup exists on HackMD, so the mechanism is well understood - the route is mapped to SkipAction and SearchHostWithAsstDetail skips AuthorizeSearchHost - but there is no input signal confirming weaponized, working exploit code. The main real-world risk is cross-business (cross-tenant) data leakage in multi-tenant CMDB deployments: any authenticated user can enumerate hosts and topology belonging to other businesses, which is a serious confidentiality/segregation breakdown for organizations relying on BlueKing's business-level isolation, even though the raw score is only medium. No conflicting signals were found between the CVSS vector and the description - both agree on network vector plus authenticated access.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A low-privileged but authenticated user of a shared BlueKing CMDB instance sends a POST request to /api/v3/hosts/search/asstdetail with search conditions that target a different business ID, or that omit the business filter entirely. Because the endpoint skips the AuthorizeSearchHost check, the server returns host attributes and topology association details for businesses the user has no rights to, enabling cross-tenant reconnaissance. A detailed public technical writeup of the flaw exists (HackMD), but the input does not confirm a verified working exploit tool.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 30, 2026

Tencent BlueKing CMDB (bk-cmdb) through 3.14.6 lets any holder of a valid account read host records belonging to other businesses by posting crafted search conditions to /api/v3/hosts/search/asstdetail, because that route is mapped to SkipAction and SearchHostWithAsstDetail never calls AuthorizeSearchHost. The result is read-only cross-tenant disclosure of host attributes and topology associations; integrity and availability are unaffected (assessed CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N, CWE-862). The exposure is bounded by the need for existing credentials and matters mainly in multi-business deployments where business-level isolation is the control being relied upon; no public exploit code has been confirmed at time of analysis, and no KEV or EPSS signal accompanies this record.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available data: the references point to the upstream repository, the release-v3.14.6 source files that contain the SkipAction mapping and the unguarded search path, and tracking issue https://github.com/TencentBlueKing/bk-cmdb/issues/8709, but none of them is a confirmed patched release, so verify with the vendor and the issue thread whether a build later than 3.14.6 corrects the authorization parser before relying on an upgrade. Until a fix is confirmed, the specific compensating control is to remove the exposure at the edge: block or restrict POST /api/v3/hosts/search/asstdetail at the reverse proxy/WAF so only administrative or explicitly trusted roles reach it, accepting that legitimate asset-detail host searches for ordinary users will fail or require an alternate endpoint. A second option is to cap BlueKing CMDB accounts to operators who are already authorized for every business on the instance and audit account issuance, with the trade-off that day-to-day least-privilege onboarding across business units becomes manual. Where business isolation is the primary security boundary, splitting highly sensitive businesses onto separate CMDB instances eliminates the cross-business path entirely at the cost of operational duplication. Upstream issue https://github.com/TencentBlueKing/bk-cmdb/issues/8709 and the VulnCheck advisory https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/blueking-cmdb-through-3.14.6-missing-authorization-via-api-v3-hosts-search-asstdetail should be monitored for a fixed release; because exploitation leaves only read traffic, watch host_server access logs for asstdetail requests whose business identifiers fall outside the caller's assigned scope.

Affected VersionsENISA

bk-cmdb 0 ≤3.14.6

Affected Packages

euvd bk_cmdb no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

BlueKing CMDB splits its backend into a scene_server layer (including host_server) and an authorization component (src/ac) that parses incoming routes and decides which action-level check applies. In release-v3.14.6 the route for POST /api/v3/hosts/search/asstdetail is registered in the authorization parser (src/ac/parser/host.go) under SkipAction, so the host_server handler SearchHostWithAsstDetail (src/scene_server/host_server/service/host.go) executes the logic-layer search (src/scene_server/host_server/logics/hostsearch.go) without passing through the AuthorizeSearchHost gate that protects comparable host-search endpoints. This is a classic CWE-862 missing authorization defect: authentication succeeds, but the per-business authorization decision is never made, so the business identifier supplied in the search body (or omitted entirely) is trusted as a scoping parameter rather than validated against the caller's permitted businesses. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:tencentblueking:bk-cmdb:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* is a version-agnostic wildcard, so the affected range is established by the description (through 3.14.6) rather than by CPE version constraints; the trigger is documented in the referenced source lines and the public write-up, and the practical gating factor is that the request must originate from an authenticated session on the target instance.

Know when Bk Cmdb gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 5.3 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 4.3 MEDIUM

Network-reachable endpoint (AV:N/AC:L), requires any authenticated account (PR:L), no user interaction; read-only cross-business data leak gives C:L with no integrity/availability impact and no scope change.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Tencent BlueKing CMDB (bk-cmdb) through 3.14.6 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated users to view hosts of other businesses via POST /api/v3/hosts/search/asstdetail. Attackers can submit host search conditions targeting other businesses or omitting business filters to retrieve host attributes and topology association details, because the route is mapped to SkipAction and SearchHostWithAsstDetail skips AuthorizeSearchHost.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 78% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche open-source ops/CMDB platform, mainly BlueKing-based DevOps environments
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

26
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +26
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy