Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft URL with malicious script in reflected parameter
-
DeliveryDeliver link to logged-in victim via phishing
-
ExploitVictim clicks, server reflects unsanitized input
-
ExecutionScript executes in victim browser context
-
ImpactSteal session tokens or perform actions as victim
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to lure a user into clicking a crafted link containing a malicious payload in a reflected input, per UI:R in the vector - it is not a no-interaction remote flaw. It is unauthenticated (PR:N) and network-reachable against the affected 'Bar Association Website' product at builds through 18092026. The key limiting factors: victim interaction is mandatory; the payload only executes in the clicking user's browser (no server compromise); the product is a niche Turkish bar-association website with limited deployment; and the specific vulnerable parameter/endpoint is not disclosed, requiring an attacker to identify the reflection point. The key aggravating factor is that no vendor patch exists (vendor unresponsive), so mitigation falls to WAF rules, input filtering, or removing the affected pages. |
| Impact | This is a textbook reflected XSS (CWE-79) with the vendor's own CVSS:3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N yielding 6.1 (medium), which I broadly agree with - reflected XSS is unauthenticated (PR:N) and network-reachable but requires the victim to click a crafted link (UI:R), inherently limiting mass automatability. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present in the supplied intelligence, so the exploitation signals are all absent rather than elevated: this reads as a real-but-not-urgent issue, not a high-priority actively-exploited flaw. The single reference is the Turkish national CERT (USOM/siberguvenlik.gov.tr) advisory tr-26-1134, and critically the vendor was contacted but never responded, meaning NO patch is available - this raises operational risk for affected sites despite the modest score, because there is no vendor fix to deploy. The S:C (scope change) and C:L/I:L reflect script execution in the victim's browser context (session/DOM access, limited integrity via injected content); I consider the vector reasonable though S:U is defensible for classic reflected XSS. Bottom line: medium technical severity, low-to-moderate real-world exploitation likelihood given UI:R and niche product, elevated by the absence of any patch. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker crafts a URL for the Bar Association Website that embeds a malicious script in a reflected parameter and delivers it to a logged-in user (e.g., a bar association member or admin) via phishing email or a malicious link. When the victim clicks, the unsanitized input is reflected into the page and the script executes in their browser, enabling session/cookie theft or actions in the site's context. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and success depends on the victim interacting with the crafted link (UI:R). |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 18, 2026
Reflected cross-site scripting (CWE-79) in KA Informatics Technologies Ltd. Co. 'Bar Association Website' builds through 18092026 lets remote, unauthenticated attackers inject script into pages that reflect user-supplied input, executing in the browser of any victim persuaded to open a crafted link. Per the CVSS:3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N (6.1 medium), network reachability is trivial and no credentials are needed, but the attacker must first lure a targeted user into clicking the malicious URL, so this is not a no-interaction or mass-automatable flaw; impact is confined to the victim's browser session (limited confidentiality/integrity, no server compromise). No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis and the issue is not in CISA KEV, but the vendor was contacted and did not respond, so no vendor-released patch was identified at time of analysis - remediation currently depends on WAF filtering, output encoding, or removing the vulnerable reflection point.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis - the vendor was contacted early but did not respond, so there is no fixed version to upgrade to and operators cannot rely on a vendor-supplied update; monitor the USOM advisory (https://siberguvenlik.gov.tr/guvenlik-bildirimleri/detay/tr-26-1134) for any later vendor response. Because the vulnerable parameter is undisclosed, the most effective compensating control is a WAF or reverse-proxy rule (e.g., ModSecurity CRS rules 941100/941110/941160 and generic reflected-XSS signatures) that inspects request parameters for script payloads and HTML-encodes or blocks the reflected response; the trade-off is potential false positives on legitimate search, query, and form input, which should be tuned in detection mode before enforcement, and WAFs only mitigate known payload patterns against the site's own reflection points. Additional layered options: apply strict context-aware output encoding (HTML entity encoding of all reflected values) and allow-list input validation at the point where the parameter is echoed into the page; deploy a restrictive Content-Security-Policy (e.g., script-src 'self' with no 'unsafe-inline') to prevent injected inline script execution, accepting that CSP may break the site's own inline JavaScript until refactored; and if the reflecting page or parameter cannot be identified and hardened, take the affected page offline or restrict it to trusted networks, at the cost of losing that site functionality. Session cookie hardening (HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite=Lax/Strict) limits the practical impact of any successful XSS payload by preventing cookie theft, and user education against clicking unsolicited links addresses the mandatory UI:R interaction, though neither removes the underlying defect.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is a missing or improper neutralization of user-controllable input during web page generation (CWE-79, reflected XSS variant). The application takes a parameter from the HTTP request and embeds it into the HTML response without context-appropriate output encoding or input validation, so markup supplied by the attacker is interpreted by the browser as part of the page rather than as inert text. The CVSS vector confirms the classic reflected-XSS profile: AV:N (reachable over the network), AC:L (no special conditions to trigger), PR:N (unauthenticated - any anonymous visitor can craft and deliver the payload link), UI:R (the victim must click the link and load the reflected response), S:C (scope change - the injected script runs in the security context of the site's origin), and C:L/I:L/A:N (limited confidentiality and integrity impact within the victim's session, no availability impact). CPE data was not supplied in the intelligence feed; the only affected product string provided is the vendor's 'Bar Association Website' line, affected through build/version 18092026. The disclosure originated from the Turkish national CERT contact (USOM, iletisim@usom.gov.tr) and is tracked under advisory TR-26-1134 on siberguvenlik.gov.tr, with no NVD description enrichment or vendor advisory available yet. Notably, the specific vulnerable parameter and endpoint are not disclosed, meaning an attacker must independently identify a reflection point on the site before a working payload can be delivered - a practical constraint on exploitation.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Unauthenticated network-delivered reflected XSS requiring victim click (UI:R); script runs in browser (S:C) with limited confidentiality/integrity impact and no availability effect.
Primary rating from Vendor (usom).
CVSS VectorVendor: usom
DescriptionCVE.org
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in KA Informatics Technologies Ltd. Co. Bar Association Website allows Reflected XSS.
This issue affects Bar Association Website: through 18092026. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
EUVD-2026-82771
GHSA-7m46-fc64-fr7f
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB