Skip to main content

Mang Board WP CVE-2026-116847

| EUVDEUVD-2026-114307 HIGH
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-10-30 Patchstack GHSA-pg2w-qw3r-q2q2
7.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Patchstack
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Craft malicious link with XSS payload
  2. Delivery
    Deliver link to targeted user
  3. Exploit
    Victim interacts and payload reflects
  4. Execution
    Script executes in victim browser context
  5. Impact
    Hijack session or perform actions as victim

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a victim to interact with an attacker-supplied request (UI:R) - such as clicking a crafted link or loading a malicious page that reaches the vulnerable Mang Board WP input on a site running version 2.4.6 or earlier. No attacker authentication is needed (PR:N), so any remote unauthenticated attacker can craft the payload, but the required user interaction is the key limiting factor: without a victim trigger, the flaw does not fire. The specific vulnerable parameter, endpoint, or configuration is not described in the available sources, so it is unverified whether a non-default setting is needed; the advisory describes it only as unauthenticated XSS affecting versions <= 2.4.6.

Impact

This is a moderate-severity reflected/unauthenticated Cross-Site Scripting flaw (CWE-79) in the Mang Board WP plugin, carrying a CVSS 7.1 vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L). The network vector, low complexity and lack of required privileges (PR:N) make it reachable by remote unauthenticated attackers, but the UI:R metric means a victim must be induced to interact (e.g., click a crafted link or visit a malicious page), which meaningfully limits mass, hands-off exploitation. The scope change (S:C) reflects that injected script executes in the victim's browser context rather than purely on the server. Exploitation signals are weak-to-absent: no CISA KEV listing, no EPSS probability supplied, and no confirmed working exploit code - only a Patchstack database advisory reference. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_week', indicating a near-term but non-emergency patching priority rather than active-exploitation urgency. Net assessment: a genuine issue worth remediating on a normal cycle, but currently a high-CVSS-for-its-class issue without evidence of real-world exploitation, and its impact is capped by the user-interaction requirement and the typical limited (Low) confidentiality/integrity impact of XSS.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker crafts a malicious link or page that injects script through the vulnerable Mang Board WP input and sends it to a victim (e.g., a logged-in site administrator or visitor). When the victim interacts with the crafted request (UI:R), the script executes in their browser in the site's context, allowing session/cookie theft or actions on their behalf. No authentication is required of the attacker, but no confirmed working exploit code is identified at time of analysis - only a Patchstack advisory reference exists.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 30, 2026

Unauthenticated cross-site scripting in Mang Board WP through version 2.4.6 allows a remote attacker to supply script-bearing content that executes when a victim interacts with a crafted request, affecting WordPress sites running the vulnerable plugin. The CVSS 7.1 vector reflects network reachability with no privileges required but user interaction, scope change, and limited confidentiality and integrity impact; the specific vulnerable parameter or endpoint is not described in the available sources. No public exploit was identified at time of analysis, and the issue is prioritized for remediation this week.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch or fixed version is listed in the provided intelligence; the advisory identifies Mang Board WP through 2.4.6 as affected. Check the Patchstack advisory and the WordPress plugin repository for a release newer than 2.4.6 and, if one is published, update to that exact version; if no fixed release is available, disable or remove the Mang Board WP plugin until a patched release is available, accepting loss of board functionality as the trade-off. Because the vulnerable parameter and endpoint are not identified in the available sources, targeted WAF rules or feature disabling cannot be scoped from this data alone; any virtual patch would need to be based on observed XSS payloads and the plugin's request handling. Reference: https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/mangboard/vulnerability/wordpress-mang-board-wp-plugin-2-4-6-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

Affected VersionsENISA

Mang Board WP n/a ≤2.4.6

Affected Packages

euvd mang_board_wp no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Mang Board WP is a WordPress plugin identified by CPE cpe:2.3:a:kitae_park:mang_board_wp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* (vendor kitae_park). The flaw is CWE-79, improper neutralization of user-controllable input before it is placed in a web page, and the advisory describes an unauthenticated XSS condition affecting versions through 2.4.6. The supplied CVSS vector is AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L; our independent assessment records A:N instead. The trigger path, vulnerable parameter, and whether any non-default configuration is required are not described in the available sources, and no public PoC or exploit reference is present in the input.

Know when Mang Board Wp gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Patchstack) PRIMARY 7.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
vuln.today AI 6.1 MEDIUM

Remote unauthenticated reflected XSS triggers in the victim browser (S:C), requiring user interaction (UI:R), with limited C/I impact and no availability impact (A:N).

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).

CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Mang Board WP <= 2.4.6 versions.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Mang Board WP plugin versions up to 2.4.6 contain an unauthenticated cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability (CVE-2026-116847) that could allow attackers to inject malicious scripts into WordPress sites. This puts site visitors and administrators at risk of credential theft or malicious actions, potentially damaging the organization's reputation and user trust. Leadership should prioritize remediation due to the high severity and potential for broad impact across affected sites.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Disable the Mang Board WP plugin until a patch is available; deploy a WAF rule to block XSS attempts targeting the plugin; restrict access to the WordPress admin area and enforce content security policy (CSP) headers to mitigate script execution.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 91% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche WordPress board plugin, limited enterprise footprint
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy