Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as low-privileged WordPress user
-
DeliveryInsert malicious script via LightBox Block
-
ExploitPayload stored in post content
-
ExecutionAdmin/user views affected page
-
ImpactScript executes in victim browser session
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated WordPress account with privileges to add or edit content using the bPlugins LightBox Block (PR:L - a low-privilege role such as contributor or author, per the CVSS vector; the exact role is not specified in the available sources). It also requires victim interaction (UI:R): another user, typically an administrator, must load the page containing the stored payload for the script to execute. The affected plugin must be installed and active on versions up to and including 1.2.0. These factors - needing a valid account to inject and a separate victim to render the content - meaningfully limit exploitation compared to an unauthenticated flaw; the precise vulnerable field is not described in the available sources. |
| Impact | This is a moderate, not emergency, priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L, base 6.5) describes a network-reachable but authenticated flaw: PR:L means an attacker needs at least low-privilege access (a WordPress account able to author/edit block content, e.g. contributor or author), and UI:R means a victim - typically an administrator or another user - must view the page carrying the stored payload before the script fires. The scope change (S:C) reflects that injected JavaScript executes in the victim's browser session rather than the vulnerable component, which is why all three impact metrics are Low. No EPSS score was supplied, the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, and the only reference is the Patchstack database entry rather than working exploit code, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or a published weaponized exploit. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_month,' consistent with a real-but-not-urgent stored XSS. The main caveat: the exact injection point and whether the privilege really is contributor-level versus admin-only is not described in the available sources, so the PR:L assumption should be verified against the Patchstack advisory. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged authenticated user (such as a contributor or author) inserts a LightBox Block containing a malicious script payload into a post or page. When an administrator or other user later views that content in the browser, the stored JavaScript executes in their session, enabling actions such as session/cookie theft or admin-context requests. No verified public exploit code was identified; the sole reference is the Patchstack database entry. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 26, 2026
Stored cross-site scripting in the bPlugins LightBox Block WordPress plugin affects all versions through 1.2.0 and lets a low-privilege authenticated user (per the CVSS vector's PR:L) store script that runs when another user - typically an administrator - loads the affected page (UI:R). Rated CVSS 6.5 with scope change (S:C), it is a moderate, not emergency, priority under a this_month decision label, and no public exploit was identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
The advisory data available at time of analysis lists no vendor-released fixed version, so the primary action is to track the Patchstack advisory for the LightBox Block plugin (https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/lightbox-block/vulnerability/wordpress-lightbox-block-plugin-1-2-0-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve) and apply the corrected release as soon as it is published; do not treat 1.2.0 as safe. As a compensating control that follows directly from the assessed prerequisites, restrict who can create or edit content with the LightBox Block - the flaw requires a low-privilege authenticated account (PR:L) to store the payload and a second user (UI:R) to render it - so tightening contributor/author roles and reviewing existing stored block content limits exposure, at the cost of constraining editorial workflow; disabling the plugin entirely removes the attack surface but breaks any existing lightbox content on the site.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The target is a WordPress Gutenberg block plugin (CPE cpe:2.3:a:bplugins:lightbox_block:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) whose block content is saved and later re-rendered on page generation, matching the CWE-79 class of improper neutralization of input during web page generation. Because output is escaped incorrectly or not at all, markup supplied by a content author survives storage and is executed in the browser of whoever views the rendered block; the scope-change metric (S:C) reflects that the injected script runs in the context of the hosting WordPress site rather than only in the attacker's own content. The CVSS 3.1 vector is AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L, i.e. a network-reachable flaw that requires an authenticated low-privilege account plus a separate victim to render the payload; the specific vulnerable field or block attribute is not described in the available sources, so the precise trigger is unverified. EUVD records the same range as LightBox Block 0 through 1.2.0 (EUVD-2026-109995), and the plugin is reported through Patchstack.
Know when Lightbox Block gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Authenticated content author injects the payload (PR:L) and a victim must view it (UI:R); stored XSS executes cross-context (S:C) with limited C/I/A impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).
CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack
DescriptionCVE.org
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in bPlugins LightBox Block lightbox-block allows Stored XSS.This issue affects LightBox Block: from n/a through 1.2.0.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
EUVD-2026-109995
GHSA-rwhv-c8f6-f4c3
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB