Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as low-privileged user
-
DeliverySubmit crafted discussion-board input
-
ExploitPayload stored without neutralization
-
ExecutionVictim loads affected page
-
PersistScript executes in victim browser session
-
ImpactHijack session or act as victim
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated account with at least low-level privileges (PR:L) able to submit content the WP Discussion Board plugin stores, plus subsequent interaction by a victim who views the injected content (UI:R) - the trigger field and the exact privilege level needed are not described in the available sources. Limiting factors: the attacker cannot act fully unauthenticated, a separate victim must load the malicious content for impact to occur, and only installations running WP Discussion Board versions up to and including 2.6.0 are affected. The payload persists server-side once stored, so impact recurs for every victim who views it until remediated. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-severity stored XSS (CVSS 6.5, CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L) in the WP Discussion Board WordPress plugin, reported by Patchstack and assigned the vuln.today 'this_month' priority rather than an urgent label. The signals are internally consistent and point to a real-but-not-emergency issue: the network attack vector and low complexity are offset by PR:L (an authenticated, low-privileged account is required to plant the payload) and UI:R (a victim must subsequently load the affected page). No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no proof-of-concept are present in the supplied data, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. The scope-change flag (S:C) and the limited-but-triple C:L/I:L/A:L impacts are typical of a script executing in another user's authenticated browser context (e.g., an administrator viewing injected content). Overall this is a legitimate patch-management item appropriately prioritized as monthly, not a drop-everything priority; the main caveat is reliance on a single source (Patchstack) and the absence of a stated fixed version. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged authenticated user (such as a registered forum participant) submits a discussion-board entry containing a malicious script payload that is stored by the plugin. When a higher-privileged user such as an administrator later views that content in wp-admin or on the site, the stored script executes in their browser session, enabling actions like session/cookie theft or performing admin actions on their behalf. No public exploit code is identified in the available sources; the specific injectable field and sanitization gap are not described in the supplied data. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 28, 2026
Stored cross-site scripting in the WP Discussion Board WordPress plugin, affecting versions through 2.6.0, allows an authenticated low-privilege user to persist script content that executes in the browser of any victim who later views it (CVSS 6.5, CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L). The attacker must hold at least a low-privileged account able to submit content the plugin stores, and impact requires a separate victim to load that content; the payload remains server-side and re-triggers for each viewer until the stored data is cleaned or the plugin is fixed. Reported by Patchstack and rated 'this_month' priority rather than an urgent label, this issue has no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV listing.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch or fixed version is identified in the available data; the Patchstack advisory (https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/wp-discussion-board/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-discussion-board-plugin-2-6-0-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve) is the authoritative source to check for a corrected release, and administrators running 2.6.0 or earlier should treat the plugin as vulnerable until a fixed build is confirmed. Because exploitation requires a low-privileged authenticated account able to submit stored content, the most direct compensating controls are to audit and reduce the roles permitted to post in the discussion board and to review or purge existing stored discussion content for injected markup; the trade-off is reduced community participation and manual review effort. If no trusted maintainer release is foreseeable, disabling the plugin removes the exposure entirely at the cost of losing the discussion functionality, and adding output/input filtering at the web application firewall layer may block common script payloads but will not repair content already stored in the database.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation), specifically the stored variant: user-supplied input accepted by the WP Discussion Board plugin is saved and later emitted into generated HTML pages without adequate encoding or sanitization. Because WP Discussion Board is a WordPress plugin, its input handling runs inside the WordPress content pipeline and its output is rendered on front-end discussion pages, so any script that survives storage is served from the trusted site origin. The assessed vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L) reflects that the attacker needs an authenticated low-privilege account to inject content but no special network position, that a victim must interact by viewing the injected page, and that the scope is changed because code executes in the victim's browser session against the hosting site. Impact is limited to low confidentiality, integrity and availability effects per the vector. The exact input field and the precise privilege level required are not described in the available sources, and the trigger is not described in the available sources.
Know when Wp Discussion Board gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Stored XSS reachable over the network by a low-privileged authenticated user (PR:L), needing victim page-load (UI:R); script runs in another security context (S:C) with limited C/I/A.
Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).
CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack
DescriptionCVE.org
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WP Discussion Board WP Discussion Board wp-discussion-board allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP Discussion Board: from n/a through 2.6.0.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
EUVD-2026-112063
GHSA-r5vg-r9rc-7pw3
NVD
CVE.org
Exploit-DB