Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged WordPress account
-
DeliverySubmit crafted input via Advanced Post Block
-
ExploitPayload stored unsanitized in plugin output
-
ExecutionAdmin or visitor renders affected page
-
ImpactScript executes in victim browser session
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated account with at least low privileges on the target WordPress site (PR:L) that can supply input processed by the Advanced Post Block - Post Grid plugin, plus victim interaction (UI:R): a second user must view the page where the unsanitized input is rendered for the stored script to execute. This limits realistic exploitation to sites that permit multiple or lower-trust contributor/author-level accounts; single-admin sites with no untrusted authenticated users are far less exposed. All versions from the earliest release through 2.5.1 are affected per the EUVD range. |
| Impact | This is a moderate, not urgent, priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L, base 6.5) describes a network-reachable but privilege- and interaction-gated stored XSS: PR:L means the attacker must already hold an authenticated low-privileged account, and UI:R means a victim must load the affected page for the payload to fire. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_month' rather than act_now or emergency, which is consistent with a privileged, interaction-dependent web flaw. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no SSVC automatable/technical-impact fields were supplied, so exploitation-probability and automatability signals are simply absent - not low, but unmeasured - and should not be read as evidence of either high or negligible risk. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis; the only reference is the Patchstack advisory, not working exploit code. The source attribution (Patchstack, ENISA EUVD) is consistent and the signals do not conflict; the main limitation is that the authenticated-user requirement and the need for victim interaction meaningfully constrain real-world exploitation compared to the 'network' attack vector alone. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker holding a low-privileged authenticated account (for example a contributor or author on a multi-user WordPress site) inserts a malicious script payload through the Advanced Post Block plugin's input handling, where it is stored. When a higher-privileged user such as an administrator subsequently views the page or post containing the stored payload, the script executes in their browser session. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis; only a Patchstack advisory reference exists. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 26, 2026
Stored cross-site scripting (CWE-79) in the bPlugins 'Advanced Post Block - Post Grid for WordPress block editor' plugin, affecting every release through 2.5.1, allows a user holding a low-privileged authenticated account to persist script-bearing input that executes in another user's browser when that content is rendered. The assessed vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N) makes this a moderate, not urgent, priority: an attacker needs a valid account on the target site plus a victim who views the affected page, so exposure is concentrated on multi-author sites that grant contributor or author-level access to untrusted people. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis, and the available intelligence lists no fixed version beyond 2.5.1.
RemediationAI
No fixed version is listed in the available intelligence, so the primary action is to check the Patchstack advisory for Advanced Post Block (https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/advanced-post-block/vulnerability/wordpress-advanced-post-block-post-grid-for-wordpress-block-editor-plugin-2-5-1-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability) and update the plugin as soon as a release above 2.5.1 is published there, since 2.5.1 and every earlier version are confirmed in range. Because the assessed prerequisites require an authenticated account at low privilege plus a second user viewing the rendered output, the practical interim controls are administrative: audit and prune contributor, author and other low-privilege accounts on sites running the plugin, and avoid granting block-editing roles to untrusted users until the plugin is updated - the trade-off is reduced editorial throughput for multi-author sites. Where the plugin's post-grid output is not essential, deactivating it removes the vulnerable render path entirely, at the cost of losing the grid/block layout on existing content. Reviewing stored block content authored by lower-trust accounts for injected markup can reduce exposure but is not a complete fix, and the available sources do not identify a sanitization filter or configuration setting that closes the issue.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The target is a WordPress plugin that provides Gutenberg block-editor components for displaying post grids, so the vulnerable surface is content supplied through the block editor and later rendered into a web page. CWE-79 covers improper neutralization of input during web page generation: data accepted from one user is emitted into HTML/attribute/script context without adequate encoding or sanitization, which converts it into executable markup for whoever loads the page. The scope-changed rating (S:C) reflects that the injected script runs in the security context of the viewing user rather than the injecting one, so a low-privileged author's payload can act with the privileges of an administrator or editor who later opens the affected view. The CPE record uses a wildcard version (cpe:2.3:a:bplugins:advanced_post_block_-_post_grid_for_wordpress_block_editor:*), and the EUVD range '0 ≤ 2.5.1' indicates that all releases up to and including 2.5.1 are affected; the precise field, block parameter, or render path that fails to sanitize is not described in the available sources, and the trigger for the stored payload is likewise unverified beyond the fact that it must be supplied by an authenticated low-privilege user and rendered to a second user.
Know when Wordpress Plugin gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Authenticated low-privileged user stores the payload (PR:L) and a victim must render it (UI:R); script runs in the victim browser across a trust boundary (S:C) with limited confidentiality/integrity impact and no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).
CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack
DescriptionCVE.org
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in bPlugins Advanced Post Block - Post Grid for WordPress block editor advanced-post-block allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Advanced Post Block - Post Grid for WordPress block editor: from n/a through 2.5.1.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
More in Wordpress Plugin
View allThe Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1
The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil
Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote
The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner
The AI Engine WordPress plugin through version 3.1.3 exposes Bearer Token values through the /mcp/v1/ REST API endpoint
The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut
The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via
The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based
SQL injection in the NotificationX WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.8.2) allows unauthenticated remote a
The POST SMTP Mailer - Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress i
The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin - for Online Courses and Education plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to union base
The Email Subscribers by Icegram Express plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘hash’ parameter in
EUVD-2026-109733
GHSA-m7ch-r3jj-vx67
NVD
CVE.org
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB