Skip to main content

sshportal CVE-2026-111638

| EUVDEUVD-2026-103060 HIGH
Missing Authorization (CWE-862)
2026-10-16 VulnCheck GHSA-xmw3-crh7-9hmm
8.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate to sshportal management shell (non-admin)
  2. Exploit
    Run 'key show default' or 'key show host'
  3. Execution
    Retrieve decrypted backend private SSH key
  4. Impact
    SSH directly to backend host bypassing ACLs and session recording

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires the attacker to hold a valid non-admin sshportal account with access to the management shell (PR:L), after which they invoke the 'key show' command against predictable, commonly-present key names such as 'default' or 'host'. No admin role and no user interaction are required, and default configurations are affected because these predictable key names exist by design. The limiting factors are: the attacker must already be an authenticated sshportal user, and the target must be running sshportal at or below version 1.19.5 as a shared multi-user bastion (a single-user or admin-only deployment has no untrusted principal to abuse).

Impact

This is a credible, medium-to-high priority issue for the specific population that runs sshportal, though its blast radius is limited by product footprint rather than exploit difficulty. The provided CVSS 4.0 vector (CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N, score 8.3) indicates a network-reachable, low-complexity attack that requires low privileges (PR:L) and no user interaction, with high confidentiality impact on both the vulnerable system (VC:H) and a subsequent system (SC:H) - the subsequent-system impact correctly captures that stolen backend keys grant access to downstream hosts. The signals are internally consistent: CWE-862 (Missing Authorization) matches the description of an authenticated non-admin user reading data they should not. No EPSS score is provided, so exploitation-probability cannot be quantified. It is NOT in CISA KEV, so there is no confirmed active exploitation. No formal POC/exploit-code signal is flagged in the input, though a public technical writeup (hackmd) describes the exact method and the exact vulnerable source lines are public, which materially lowers the barrier to exploitation. The main reason this is not a top-tier emergency is prevalence, not technical severity: sshportal is a niche open-source bastion, so this is a serious flaw in a low-footprint product rather than a widespread internet-scale risk. Within any environment that does run sshportal with multiple non-admin users, however, it is a direct, high-value privilege/ACL escalation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An authenticated non-admin sshportal user connects to the management shell and runs the 'key show' command with a predictable key name such as 'default' or 'host', which returns the decrypted backend private SSH key. The attacker then uses that key to connect directly to backend hosts, bypassing sshportal's ACLs and session recording entirely. A public technical writeup documents the method and the vulnerable source lines, and the low-complexity network vector (AV:N/AC:L) makes execution trivial once an account is held.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 16, 2026

Authenticated non-admin users of sshportal's management shell can retrieve decrypted backend SSH private keys through the 'key show' command, allowing them to connect directly to managed hosts and bypass ACLs and session recording. The flaw affects sshportal through version 1.19.5 and requires only a valid non-admin account with management shell access; default deployments are impacted because predictable key names such as 'default' and 'host' are commonly present. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 4.0 score is 8.3 (High) and our assessment rates it as a medium-to-high priority for shared multi-user bastion deployments.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch was identified at time of analysis for CVE-2026-111638; the reference to v1.19.5 points to the vulnerable source, not a fix. Until an update is available, restrict access to the sshportal management shell to trusted administrators only-if non-admin accounts do not require shell access, remove that privilege or disable the shell for them. If the shell must remain multi-user, audit and eliminate predictable backend key names such as 'default' and 'host', and rotate any private keys stored under those names; be aware this may break existing host configurations that reference them. Network-level controls, such as firewalling management shell access or requiring additional authentication (e.g., SSH certificates or MFA) in front of sshportal, reduce exposure but do not fix the missing authorization check. Monitor logs for unexpected 'key show' invocations by non-admin users. Consult the VulnCheck advisory and the public write-up for detection guidance and any future fix: https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/sshportal-through-1.19.5-missing-authorization-in-key-show-command-exposes-private-keys and https://hackmd.io/@hieuPenguinnn/sshportal-key-show-privkey-disclosure.

Affected VersionsENISA

sshportal 0 ≤1.19.5

Affected Packages

euvd sshportal no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

sshportal (by moul) is an SSH bastion/jump server that manages connections to backend hosts, storing private keys for those hosts and enforcing access control lists and session recording through a management shell. CWE-862 (Missing Authorization) is the root cause: the 'key show' command in pkg/bastion/shell.go (lines 1513-1584 in v1.19.5) does not verify that the requesting user has an administrative role before returning decrypted private key material. Because key names are predictable and often left at defaults like 'default' or 'host', any authenticated non-admin user who can reach the management shell can enumerate and dump backend credentials. The CVSS 4.0 vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N reflects remote network access with low attack complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, high confidentiality impact, and scope change to backend systems-consistent with the independent CVSS 3.1 assessment (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N).

Know when Sshportal gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 8.3 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 7.7 HIGH

Authenticated non-admin access gives PR:L over the network with low complexity; disclosing backend keys grants access to other hosts, so scope changes (S:C) with high confidentiality and no integrity/availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
High
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

sshportal through 1.19.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the management shell 'key show' command that allows authenticated non-admin users to obtain decrypted backend private SSH keys. Attackers can request predictable key names like 'default' or 'host' to retrieve private keys and connect directly to backend hosts, bypassing ACLs and session recording.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

sshportal deployments through version 1.19.5 expose the decrypted SSH private keys for managed hosts to any non-admin user who holds a management shell account, allowing that user to connect directly to backend systems and sidestep the access control lists and session recording that sshportal is deployed to enforce. Because default installations commonly include predictably named keys such as 'default' and 'host', the exposure is likely to be present in most shared multi-user bastion environments without any additional misconfiguration. Leadership should treat this as a failure of a core security control wherever sshportal is treated as a trust boundary, and as an audit and compliance concern where session recording is relied upon as evidence of privileged activity.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict management shell access on sshportal 1.19.5 and earlier to trusted administrators only and remove non-admin management shell accounts; rotate all backend SSH private keys held by sshportal and replace predictable key names such as 'default' and 'host'; enforce host-side source restrictions so rotated keys are accepted only from the bastion; monitor and alert on 'key show' command usage in management shell logs.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 77% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche open-source SSH bastion tool, limited enterprise deployment footprint
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

42
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +42
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy