Skip to main content

Advanced Views CVE-2026-109995

| EUVDEUVD-2026-110755 HIGH
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-10-27 Wordfence GHSA-678p-m5qh-f4jf
7.2
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Wordfence
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Submit comment with script payload via 'comment' parameter
  2. Delivery
    Payload stored unsanitized, bypassing approval filter
  3. Exploit
    Victim loads avf-layout block bound to comment ID
  4. Execution
    Script executes in victim browser context
  5. Impact
    Hijack session or perform actions as victim

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the target WordPress site to run Advanced Views (acf-views) version ≤3.9.6 AND to publish a page containing an avf-layout block whose Comment Content field is bound to a comment ID the attacker can control via submitted comments. The attacker injects the payload through the public 'comment' parameter; crucially, the comment does NOT need to be approved or moderated because the get_comment() lookup applies no approval-status filter, so standard comment moderation does not limit exploitation. The payload executes whenever any visitor loads the page rendering that comment-bound block. The practical limiting factor is configuration-specific: sites that do not use the plugin's comment-content field inside a rendered view/layout are not exposed, even if the vulnerable plugin is installed. No authentication is required (PR:N).

Impact

This is a genuine but second-tier priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N, base 7.2 High) indicates remote, low-complexity, unauthenticated exploitation with a scope change - consistent with stored XSS where attacker-injected script executes in the browser security context of other site visitors. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_week' (not act_now/emergency), which aligns with a serious-but-not-crisis posture. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no confirmed proof-of-concept exploit code are present in the input, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or mass weaponization; the signals point to a patch-promptly rather than drop-everything situation. The one notable amplifier specific to this flaw is that the plugin's get_comment() lookup applies no approval-status filter, so a payload fires even from pending/unapproved comments - meaning the normal moderation safeguard does NOT mitigate it, which raises real-world exploitability above a typical comment-based XSS that would require approval. The impact is bounded: C:L/I:L/A:N reflects limited confidentiality/integrity harm (session/DOM-level script execution) rather than server compromise. Net: a real priority to patch this week for sites running the plugin, but not a high-CVSS-but-illusory issue, and not an emergency on current signals.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker submits a blog comment containing a crafted script payload in the 'comment' parameter on a site running Advanced Views ≤3.9.6; because the plugin's comment-content lookup ignores approval status, the comment does not need to be moderated or approved. When any visitor - including an administrator - loads a page containing an avf-layout block bound to that comment ID, the stored script executes in their browser. No public exploit code is identified in the provided sources, though the vulnerable and fixed source lines are publicly referenced.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 28, 2026

Stored cross-site scripting in the Advanced Views - Display Framework - Gutenberg/Elementor/Shortcode plugin (acf-views) for WordPress, affecting all versions up to and including 3.9.6, allows unauthenticated visitors to plant script payloads through the public 'comment' parameter that later execute in the browser of anyone loading a page where an avf-layout block renders that comment's content. The decisive weakness is that the plugin's get_comment() lookup applies no approval-status filter, so a pending or unapproved comment is enough to trigger the payload - ordinary comment moderation does not mitigate the attack. Severity is rated CVSS 7.2 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N, CWE-79) with a this_week priority label; no public exploit code and no CISA KEV entry were identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Update the Advanced Views (acf-views) plugin to 3.9.7, the plugin repository tag that contains the corrected Comment_Content_Field implementation, and confirm the change against the Wordfence advisory at https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/57ccea1b-d579-444e-a7e6-ae1ed218ea59?source=cve ; the diff can be reviewed against the 3.9.6 files on WordPress Trac (Comment_Content_Field.php lines 27 and 50, Custom_Field.php line 70). Where an immediate update is not possible, the configuration-specific exposure must be removed: audit Gutenberg/Elementor layouts and shortcodes for avf-layout blocks that bind the Comment Content field to visitor-supplied comment IDs and unpublish or rebind those blocks until the plugin is patched, accepting that this breaks the affected comment-display feature on those pages. Disabling comments on pages that render such blocks removes the injection channel but is only a partial control, since any pre-existing malicious comment remains stored and will execute on page load once comments are re-enabled - so existing comment content must be reviewed and removed as well. Note that comment moderation and approval queues provide no protection here, because the vulnerable lookup does not filter on approval status. Deleting the plugin entirely removes the exposure at the cost of losing its layout/display functionality.

Affected VersionsENISA

Advanced Views – Display Framework – Gutenberg/Elementor/Shortcode 0 ≤3.9.6

Affected Packages

euvd advanced_views_display_framework_gutenberg_elementor_shortcode no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Advanced Views (plugin slug acf-views) is a WordPress display framework that binds ACF-style data fields to Gutenberg and Elementor layouts via avf-layout blocks and shortcodes. Its data-vendor layer exposes WordPress comment data through classes such as Comment_Content_Field, which retrieves a comment object and hands its stored content to the rendering pipeline. The advisory references point at src/Cpt/Data_Vendors/Wp/Fields/Comment/Comment_Content_Field.php (lines 27 and 50) and the shared base class src/Cpt/Data_Vendors/Base/Fields/Custom_Field.php (line 70) in tag 3.9.6, i.e. the point where comment content is fetched and emitted without adequate sanitization on input or escaping on output - the CWE-79 class. Two properties raise the practical risk above a typical stored XSS: the sink is a front-end block that executes for every visitor of the rendered page, and the comment lookup has no approval-status gate, so the attacker does not need a moderated comment to be published. The CVSS scope-change component (S:C) reflects that the injected script runs in the context of the hosting page rather than the plugin itself. Exposure is configuration-dependent: sites that do not render the plugin's comment-content field inside a view/layout are not exploitable through this vector even when 3.9.6 is installed.

Know when Wordpress Plugin gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Wordfence) PRIMARY 7.2 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 7.2 HIGH

Unauthenticated remote comment submission (PR:N, AV:N, AC:L); stored script runs in other users' browsers, a scope change (S:C) with limited C/I and no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Wordfence).

CVSS VectorVendor: Wordfence

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

The Advanced Views - Display Framework for Gutenberg & Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'comment' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.9.6 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability is exploitable even against pending or unapproved comments, as the plugin's get_comment() lookup applies no approval-status filter, meaning a payload executes for any visitor loading an avf-layout block bound to the attacker's comment ID before the comment is ever reviewed.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Advanced Views plugin (versions up to 3.9.6) for WordPress allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts via public comments, which then execute in the browsers of site visitors viewing affected pages. This puts site users at risk of session hijacking, data theft, and further compromise, and could damage the organization's reputation and customer trust. Leadership should prioritize remediation because the plugin is widely used and the vulnerability requires no authentication or user interaction, making it attractive to attackers.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include disabling the plugin, implementing a custom patch to filter unapproved comments, or deploying a web application firewall rule to block script injection in comments.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 85% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
WordPress plugin with a moderate, non-ubiquitous production install base
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
Yes
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

CVE-2023-6553 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 15

The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1

CVE-2024-5084 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 23

The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil

CVE-2024-44000 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 20

Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2020-36847 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 12

The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner

CVE-2025-11749 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 05

The AI Engine WordPress plugin through version 3.1.3 exposes Bearer Token values through the /mcp/v1/ REST API endpoint

CVE-2025-27007 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 01

The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut

CVE-2016-1209 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 14

The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via

CVE-2024-4443 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 22

The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based

CVE-2024-1698 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 27

SQL injection in the NotificationX WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.8.2) allows unauthenticated remote a

CVE-2023-6875 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 11

The POST SMTP Mailer - Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress i

CVE-2024-1512 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 17

The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin - for Online Courses and Education plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to union base

CVE-2024-4295 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 05

The Email Subscribers by Icegram Express plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘hash’ parameter in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy