Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privilege WordPress account
-
ExploitSend crafted request to Meta Box endpoint
-
ExecutionBypass missing authorization check
-
ImpactRead restricted custom-field/meta data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated WordPress account on the target site (CVSS PR:L), so the realistic precondition is a site that permits low-privilege account creation (e.g. open user registration) or an attacker who already holds any valid account. The specific condition from the description is 'incorrectly configured access control security levels' within the Meta Box plugin - i.e. the vulnerable code path fails to verify that the requesting user is authorized for the targeted custom-field/meta data. Limiting factors: a valid account is mandatory (not unauthenticated), impact is confined to confidentiality (C:H, no integrity or availability impact), and only sites running Meta Box at or below version 5.15.2 are affected. No user interaction is required (UI:N). |
| Impact | This is a Missing Authorization flaw (CWE-862) in the Meta Box WordPress Custom Fields Framework, scored CVSS 6.5 (Medium). The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N indicates network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation requiring low-level authentication (PR:L - e.g. a subscriber/contributor-tier account), no user interaction, with high confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability impact - consistent with unauthorized read access to data that should be access-controlled. On real-world prioritization signals, this is a moderate rather than urgent issue: there is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, so there is no evidence of active or automatable exploitation. No EPSS score, SSVC decision, or POC indicator was provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified - this absence is a gap, not a low score. The requirement for an authenticated account (PR:L) meaningfully limits mass exploitation compared to a fully unauthenticated flaw. The CVSS vector and the description (broken/incorrectly configured access control) are internally consistent. One labeling nuance: the input Tags call this 'Authentication Bypass', whereas the description and CWE-862 describe missing authorization / broken access control - these are distinct weakness classes; verify framing before reporting to stakeholders. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who holds a low-privilege WordPress account (such as a self-registered subscriber on a site with open registration) sends a crafted authenticated request to a Meta Box endpoint that fails to enforce proper authorization checks. Because the access-control check is missing or misconfigured, the attacker reads custom-field or meta data they should not be permitted to access, disclosing sensitive information. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and the attack requires a valid (if low-privileged) account. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 20, 2026
Missing authorization in the Meta Box WordPress Custom Fields Framework (versions up to and including 5.15.2) lets an authenticated low-privilege user read custom-field and meta data they are not authorized to access, because the vulnerable code path does not verify that the requester holds the required capability. Only confidentiality is impacted (CVSS 6.5, AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/C:H/I:N/A:N), and exploitation requires a valid WordPress account on the target site - so sites with open user registration or any attacker-held account are the realistic risk. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released fixed version is identified in the available data, so the primary action is to check the Patchstack advisory (https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/meta-box/vulnerability/wordpress-meta-box-wordpress-custom-fields-framework-plugin-5-15-2-broken-access-control-vulnerability) and the Meta Box WordPress.org plugin page for the first release above 5.15.2 and upgrade to it as soon as it is published; because the plugin is bundled by many themes, verify the active plugin version rather than assuming the theme bundle is current. Compensating controls while a patch is pending, each with trade-offs: close public registration and disable any self-service role assignment (Settings > General and membership plugins) so attackers cannot obtain the PR:L account required, at the cost of blocking legitimate onboarding; audit and tighten user roles so no subscriber/contributor role can reach the meta-data endpoints; add a WAF or reverse-proxy rule that blocks unauthenticated or low-privilege requests to the plugin's admin-ajax/REST meta-data handlers (may break legitimate front-end forms relying on those routes); and review whether sensitive values are stored in custom fields at all, since data already exposed should be treated as disclosed and rotated if it includes secrets or personal data.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Meta Box is a widely deployed WordPress custom fields framework used by themes and plugins to register and render post, term, user, and settings meta via the WordPress metadata APIs. The flaw is CWE-862 (Missing Authorization): a handler that serves or exposes registered custom-field/meta data performs no capability or nonce/ownership check against the requesting user, relying instead on site-configured access control that is frequently too permissive. As a result, any authenticated subscriber-level session can retrieve meta values belonging to other posts, users, or settings objects, producing a confidentiality-only exposure (C:H) of potentially sensitive stored data. The CPE string confirms the affected package as the elightup meta_box WordPress plugin, with the vulnerable range extending through 5.15.2 per the Patchstack-reported advisory. Because the request is network-reachable and requires no interaction (AV:N/AC:L/UI:N), the only barrier is obtaining a logged-in account (PR:L), which is trivial on sites permitting self-registration.
Know when Wordpress Plugin gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Network-reachable endpoint (AV:N) with a low-privilege account required (PR:L) and no user interaction; missing authorization discloses restricted data (C:H) without altering or disrupting it (I:N/A:N).
Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).
CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack
DescriptionCVE.org
Missing Authorization vulnerability in eLightUp Meta Box - WordPress Custom Fields Framework meta-box allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Meta Box - WordPress Custom Fields Framework: from n/a through 5.15.2.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
More in Wordpress Plugin
View allThe Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1
The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil
Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote
The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner
The AI Engine WordPress plugin through version 3.1.3 exposes Bearer Token values through the /mcp/v1/ REST API endpoint
The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut
The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via
The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based
SQL injection in the NotificationX WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.8.2) allows unauthenticated remote a
The POST SMTP Mailer - Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress i
The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin - for Online Courses and Education plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to union base
The Email Subscribers by Icegram Express plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘hash’ parameter in
EUVD-2026-105131
GHSA-cpcj-mprm-rqgp
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB