Skip to main content

JeecgBoot CVE-2026-108657

| EUVDEUVD-2026-96596 HIGH
Missing Authorization (CWE-862)
2026-10-10 VulnCheck GHSA-gp9m-m3c8-jw96
8.6
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as low-privilege user
  2. Delivery
    Submit tenant-admin application via doApplyTenantPackUser
  3. Exploit
    Self-approve via PUT /sys/tenant/passApply
  4. Execution
    Gain tenant administrator pack permissions
  5. Impact
    Control arbitrary tenant

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires a valid authenticated session on the JeecgBoot instance (PR:L) - the attacker must be able to call doApplyTenantPackUser to create a pending application and then PUT /sys/tenant/passApply to approve it. The deployment must use JeecgBoot's multi-tenant ('tenant pack') functionality for the privilege gain to be meaningful. No user interaction, no special non-default feature toggle, and no elevated privileges are cited in the description; the limiting factors are that the attacker needs an existing low-privilege account and that the target must operate tenants. Affected: JeecgBoot through 3.9.5.

Impact

This is a genuine priority for any organization running JeecgBoot in a multi-tenant configuration, though the signals are moderate rather than critical. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N) confirms network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation requiring only low-privilege authentication (PR:L) - meaning any registered/authenticated user, not an anonymous attacker. Technical impact is high on confidentiality and integrity (VC:H/VI:H) but none on availability (VA:N), consistent with a privilege-escalation/broken-access-control flaw (CWE-862) rather than a service-disrupting bug. A public POC exists (reported by VulnCheck), which materially raises practical risk, but there is NO CISA KEV listing and NO EPSS score provided in the input, so there is no evidence of active or widespread exploitation - exploitation status is 'publicly available exploit code exists,' which must not be conflated with in-the-wild activity. Net: a real, exploitable privilege-escalation issue with a working POC that any authenticated tenant user can run, but absent KEV/EPSS data the urgency is driven by the public exploit and the authenticated-but-low bar rather than by confirmed mass exploitation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who holds any ordinary authenticated account on a JeecgBoot instance first files a pending tenant-admin application via the doApplyTenantPackUser endpoint, then self-approves it by issuing a PUT request to /sys/tenant/passApply, which fails to verify the caller's authorization. The result is that the low-privileged user grants themselves tenant administrator ('pack') permissions in an arbitrary tenant. A public POC (poc_tenant_ownership_and_pack_approval.py) demonstrating this chain is available, and given the low attack complexity (AC:L) the attack is straightforward to reproduce.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
1 public PoC No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 10, 2026

Privilege escalation in JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 lets any authenticated user approve their own pending tenant administrator application and obtain tenant-admin ('tenant pack') permissions across any tenant. The SysTenantController passApply handler performs no authorization check, so a low-privilege account can file an application via doApplyTenantPackUser and then approve it with a PUT to /sys/tenant/passApply, reaching high confidentiality and integrity impact without user interaction or elevated privileges (assessed CVSS 3.1 8.1, PR:L). Publicly available exploit code exists - a Python proof-of-concept for tenant ownership and pack approval is published on GitHub and referenced by VulnCheck - but no CISA KEV entry has been reported, so confirmed active exploitation cannot be asserted.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version was identified at time of analysis: the only vendor-supplied reference in the input points to the vulnerable source lines in SysTenantController.java (commit e3b9dc0a, lines 838-842) rather than to a tagged fixed release, so organizations should treat any upgrade as unconfirmed until JeecgBoot publishes a version above 3.9.5 and should track the VulnCheck advisory (https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/jeecgboot-through-3.9.5-missing-authorization-via-sys-tenant-passapply) for a fixed build. Until then, apply compensating controls in order of effectiveness: add a server-side authorization check (or an API-gateway/reverse-proxy rule) that rejects PUT /sys/tenant/passApply and calls to doApplyTenantPackUser from any principal lacking an explicit platform- or tenant-administrator role - this directly blocks the exploit chain, but must be maintained outside the application and will break legitimate self-service application flows if scoped too broadly; if multi-tenancy is not required, disable the tenant pack feature entirely so the affected endpoints are unreachable, accepting loss of tenant isolation functionality; restrict the /sys/tenant/* namespace to trusted administrative networks or IP ranges, which reduces exposure but does not remediate the underlying flaw for insiders; and audit the sys tenant pack user and tenant application tables for approved records whose applicant and approver are the same account, plus alert on the doApplyTenantPackUser-then-passApply sequence in logs, as detection rather than prevention. Note that the public GitHub PoC lowers the effort required to exploit this, so prioritization should assume a capable authenticated attacker already inside the tenant.

Affected VersionsENISA

JeecgBoot 0 ≤3.9.5

Affected Packages

euvd jeecgboot no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

JeecgBoot is a Spring Boot based low-code development platform whose system module includes a multi-tenant subsystem, often described as 'tenant packs', implemented in jeecg-system-biz under org.jeecg.modules.system.controller.SysTenantController. The vulnerability is CWE-862 (Missing Authorization): the passApply handler that finalizes a tenant administrator application does not verify that the caller is a tenant administrator, a platform administrator, or the owner/reviewer of the application being approved. The affected flow is two-step and entirely reachable over HTTP with a normal session - an attacker first creates a pending request through doApplyTenantPackUser and then submits an approval through PUT /sys/tenant/passApply, which flips the application to approved and grants the caller tenant administrator pack permissions. The publicly linked source lines (SysTenantController.java, lines 838-842, commit e3b9dc0a) show the handler in question. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:jeecgboot:jeecgboot:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* is a wildcard-version entry, confirming the affected product with no version ceiling expressed in the CPE itself. Because the flaw is authorization logic rather than memory corruption or injection, exploitation is deterministic and requires no crafted payload; the only prerequisites are a valid low-privilege authenticated session and a deployment that actually uses JeecgBoot's multi-tenant/tenant pack functionality.

Know when Jeecgboot gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 8.6 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Network-reachable with low complexity, but requires an authenticated low-privilege account (PR:L) to invoke the apply/approve endpoints; high C/I from tenant-admin takeover, no availability impact (A:N).

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the SysTenantController passApply handler that allows any authenticated user to approve tenant administrator applications. Attackers can file a pending application via doApplyTenantPackUser and approve it through PUT /sys/tenant/passApply to gain tenant administrator pack permissions in any tenant.

Technical POC Analysis

CWE-862 (Missing Authorization) in the tenant-pack approval handler.

Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.

Latest POC

1 public PoC link from github

Sign in to open the public PoC links collected for this CVE.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

JeecgBoot versions through 3.9.5 contain a high-severity privilege escalation flaw that allows an authenticated low-privilege user to self-approve a tenant administrator application and gain tenant-wide administrative rights. Publicly available exploit code exists, so any organization using affected JeecgBoot deployments with multiple tenants or untrusted authenticated users faces elevated risk of unauthorized access to tenant data and administrative functions. Security leadership should prioritize immediate containment, detection, and remediation planning across all affected instances.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include restricting network access to /sys/tenant/passApply and tenant administration endpoints, blocking or disabling doApplyTenantPackUser/passApply functionality via reverse proxy or WAF where business-feasible, enforcing least privilege and strong authentication for all JeecgBoot accounts, monitoring and auditing tenant pack approval events for unauthorized self-approvals, and manual review of tenant administrator assignments.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 87% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular open-source low-code platform, moderate real-world production deployment
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

63
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +43
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

CVE-2026-58375 HIGH POC
8.7 Jun 30

Unauthenticated report data exfiltration in JimuReport (JeecgBoot) through version 2.5.0 lets remote attackers export th

CVE-2026-58377 HIGH POC
8.6 Jun 30

Broken access control in JeecgBoot through 3.9.2 lets authenticated low-privilege users reach the OpenApiAuthController

CVE-2026-108628 HIGH POC
8.6 Oct 10

Missing authorization in the saveDeptRolePermission endpoint of JeecgBoot's SysDepartPermissionController lets any authe

CVE-2024-57606 HIGH POC
7.5 Feb 07

SQL injection vulnerability in Beijing Guoju Information Technology Co., Ltd JeecgBoot v.3.7.2 allows a remote attacker

CVE-2023-34603 HIGH POC
7.5 Jun 19

JeecgBoot up to v 3.5.1 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the component queryFilterTableDictIn

CVE-2023-34602 HIGH POC
7.5 Jun 19

JeecgBoot up to v 3.5.1 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the component queryTableDictItemsByC

CVE-2026-108623 HIGH POC
7.1 Oct 10

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 ships a system log controller whose batch-delete handler performs no authorization check, so any

CVE-2026-108648 HIGH POC
7.1 Oct 10

Database credential disclosure in JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 allows any authenticated low-privileged user to retrieve JDBC

CVE-2026-108671 HIGH POC
7.1 Oct 10

Missing authorization in JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 lets any authenticated user enumerate record IDs through the unguarded

CVE-2026-108677 HIGH POC
7.1 Oct 10

Authenticated low-privileged users of JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 can retrieve any other user's stored password ciphertext t

CVE-2026-108883 HIGH POC
7.1 Oct 11

Authenticated users of any privilege level on JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 can rewrite DingTalk, WeCom, or Feishu third-party

CVE-2026-108661 HIGH POC
7.1 Oct 10

Tenant ownership takeover in JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 lets any authenticated user - regardless of privilege level - reass

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy