Skip to main content

Everest Forms CVE-2026-108491

| EUVDEUVD-2026-102006 HIGH
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-10-15 audit@patchstack.com GHSA-548q-pc6g-p633
7.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: patchstack
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Submit crafted payload into form field
  2. Delivery
    Payload stored unsanitized by plugin
  3. Exploit
    Admin views stored entry in dashboard
  4. Execution
    Script executes in authenticated session
  5. Impact
    Session hijack or admin-context actions

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires (1) an attacker able to inject and persist a script payload into Everest Forms data - typically via a form submission field or plugin setting - and (2) a subsequent victim, most plausibly an administrator or privileged user, rendering that stored data in their authenticated browser context, which is the UI:R requirement that triggers execution. Limiting factors: the attack is not self-firing (it depends on an operator viewing the malicious entry), impact is bounded to the browser session rather than the server, and despite the input's PR:N claim, persisting the payload may in practice require at least low-privilege authenticated access to the form/submission mechanism. The flaw affects Everest Forms versions through 3.6.1; sites on a later patched release are not exposed.

Impact

This is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (CWE-79) flaw in the Everest Forms WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 3.6.1), carrying a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.1 with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L. The network vector, low complexity, and scope change (S:C) indicate the injected script executes in a different security context (e.g. an administrator's authenticated browser session viewing stored form data), which is what elevates the score above a typical reflected XSS. However, several high-impact signals are MISSING: there is no EPSS exploitation-probability score provided, the vulnerability is NOT listed in CISA KEV, and no public proof-of-concept is referenced - so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' A notable tension: the input vector asserts PR:N (unauthenticated) yet UI:R (requires an operator to view the stored payload), and Patchstack-class stored-XSS findings in form plugins very commonly require at least contributor/author-level access to persist the payload - VERIFY the privilege requirement with the vendor advisory, as PR:N may overstate reachability. Overall this is a moderate-priority, defense-in-depth issue rather than a mass-exploitation emergency: real-world risk hinges on an attacker being able to store the payload and an admin subsequently rendering it.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker submits a form (or crafts plugin input) containing a malicious script payload that Everest Forms stores without proper neutralization. When an administrator later views the submitted entry or a page rendering that data in the WordPress dashboard, the script executes in the admin's authenticated session (scope change), potentially stealing session cookies or performing actions as the admin. No public exploit code is referenced, so exploitation would require an attacker to independently craft the stored payload.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 15, 2026

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) in the Everest Forms WordPress plugin affects all releases through and including 3.6.1, allowing an attacker to persist a script payload inside form-submitted or plugin-stored data that later executes in the browser of a privileged user who views it. Our independent assessment rates this CVSS 3.1 at 7.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N), reflecting that the payload is not self-firing - it requires a victim (most plausibly an administrator) to render the stored content, and that persisting it may in practice demand at least low-privilege authenticated access despite the upstream PR:N claim. Impact is bounded to the victim's browser session rather than the server, no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, the issue does not appear in CISA KEV, and no EPSS score was supplied; sites running a release later than 3.6.1 are not exposed.

RemediationAI

Patch status is not confirmed by the provided data: no vendor release note, changelog entry, or tagged fixed version is included, and the only reference is the Patchstack advisory, so the safest course is to upgrade Everest Forms to the newest available release beyond 3.6.1 and verify against the vendor changelog that the XSS issue is addressed, using the Patchstack advisory at https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/everest-forms/vulnerability/wordpress-everest-forms-plugin-3-6-1-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability-2 as the tracking reference. If an upgrade cannot be scheduled immediately, apply compensating controls with their trade-offs in mind: restrict who can create forms, edit plugin settings, and submit entries to trusted roles, accepting reduced form availability for public users; require moderation/approval for all submissions so unreviewed payloads never render in the admin entry list, at the cost of manual review overhead; disable or remove the plugin entirely if forms are not business-critical, which eliminates the exposure but breaks any live forms; and deploy WAF or application-level output-encoding (for example, escaping stored values before they are echoed into admin pages) as a stopgap, recognizing that generic WAF signatures for stored XSS are easily bypassed by encoding tricks and do not fix the underlying storage flaw. Restricting wp-admin access by IP or requiring re-authentication for administrative users also reduces the population of victims a stored payload can reach, though it does not stop injection.

Affected VersionsENISA

Everest Forms 0 ≤3.6.1

Affected Packages

euvd everest_forms no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-79, improper neutralization of input during web page generation, in the Everest Forms plugin for WordPress. Form submissions and plugin-configured settings are stored in the WordPress database and subsequently rendered back into administrative pages - entry/submission listings, form previews, and settings screens - without adequate output encoding for the HTML context, so attacker-supplied markup survives storage and executes as script when the page is generated. The CVSS vector carries S:C (scope changed), meaning code executes in the context of the vulnerable component's parent page rather than staying confined to it, and UI:R, meaning an operator must actively view the tainted data before the payload fires. The upstream NVD vector claims PR:N (unauthenticated), but the authoritative independent assessment applies PR:L because persisting a payload through the form/submission mechanism generally presupposes at least low-privilege authenticated access; the discrepancy should be treated as an unresolved input-quality issue rather than a confirmed unauthenticated primitive. No CPE strings were supplied with the intelligence feed, so affected product identification relies on the description's version bound and the Patchstack advisory rather than machine-readable platform data.

Know when Wordpress Plugin gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (patchstack) PRIMARY 7.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
vuln.today AI 5.4 MEDIUM

Stored XSS needs an operator to render the payload (UI:R) and executes cross-context (S:C); PR:L reflects the typical need to authenticate to persist input, and A:N as XSS does not impair availability.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (patchstack).

CVSS VectorVendor: patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Everest Forms Everest Forms everest-forms allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Everest Forms: from n/a through 3.6.1.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A stored cross-site scripting flaw in the Everest Forms WordPress plugin (all versions through 3.6.1) allows an attacker with low-privilege authenticated access to plant malicious script that later runs in an administrator's browser when the stored content is viewed. Because the payload executes in a privileged user's session, it could be leveraged to hijack administrative actions or sessions on any affected WordPress site we operate. Site owners and administrators on versions up to 3.6.1 are the primary exposed population, and because no vendor patch is currently available, risk must be managed through interim controls until a fix ships.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include blocking or disabling the Everest Forms plugin and its rendering endpoints until a fix is available, restricting wp-admin access by IP allowlist or VPN, enforcing least-privilege roles so low-privilege accounts cannot inject content, deploying WAF rules or a strict Content-Security-Policy to block inline and stored script execution, auditing and sanitizing stored form data and plugin entries, and rotating administrator credentials and sessions.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 97% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular WordPress form plugin, large but not universal install base
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

CVE-2023-6553 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 15

The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1

CVE-2024-5084 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 23

The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil

CVE-2024-44000 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 20

Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2020-36847 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 12

The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner

CVE-2025-27007 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 01

The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut

CVE-2016-1209 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 14

The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via

CVE-2024-4443 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 22

The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based

CVE-2024-1698 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 27

SQL injection in the NotificationX WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.8.2) allows unauthenticated remote a

CVE-2023-6875 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 11

The POST SMTP Mailer - Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress i

CVE-2024-1512 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 17

The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin - for Online Courses and Education plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to union base

CVE-2024-4295 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 05

The Email Subscribers by Icegram Express plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘hash’ parameter in

CVE-2024-50498 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Oct 28

Remote code execution in the WP Query Console WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 1.0) by Ajit Bohra allows u

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy