Skip to main content

Omada Controller CVE-2026-107795

| EUVDEUVD-2026-101711 HIGH
Improper Access Control (CWE-284)
2026-10-14 f23511db-6c3e-4e32-a477-6aa17d310630 GHSA-wqgm-rp69-4p52
7.5
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: f23511db-6c3e-4e32-a477-6aa17d310630
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged authenticated session
  2. Delivery
    Invoke MSP/OpenAPI cert-management API
  3. Exploit
    Bypass missing admin authorization check
  4. Execution
    Upload rogue or delete TLS cert/private key
  5. Impact
    Disrupt or hijack secure management access

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires a valid authenticated account on the Omada Controller - the description states a low-privileged authenticated user is sufficient (which conflicts with the input vector's PR:H) - plus network reachability to the MSP or OpenAPI certificate/private-key management endpoints, which are the specific features lacking an administrative-authorization check. Exploitation is limited by the need for prior authentication and access to those API surfaces; deployments that do not enable the MSP/OpenAPI interfaces or that restrict management-plane network exposure materially reduce risk. No end-user interaction is required.

Impact

This is a broken-access-control flaw (CWE-284) in Omada Controller's MSP and OpenAPI certificate/private-key management APIs, where administrative authorization is not enforced, letting a lower-privileged authenticated user perform privileged certificate operations. Signals are mixed and incomplete: no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit were provided, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' - there is no evidence of active or widespread exploitation. The provided CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N, VC:H/VI:H/VA:H, score 7.5) is internally inconsistent with the description: it specifies PR:H (high privileges) while the description explicitly states a 'low-privileged authenticated user' can exploit it - this contradiction materially changes the risk and should be verified with the vendor, since a low-privilege requirement makes the flaw substantially more exploitable than PR:H implies. The real-world impact is primarily integrity and availability of secure management (uploading a rogue certificate or deleting the controller's cert/private key), not mass data theft. Net assessment: a genuine, moderate-to-high-severity authorization issue worth prioritizing on exposed/multi-tenant (MSP) deployments, but it requires an existing authenticated account and shows no current exploitation signal, so it is a 'patch on normal cadence, expedite if management plane is internet-exposed' issue rather than an emergency.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already holds a low-privileged authenticated account on an Omada Controller (e.g., a limited MSP tenant or operator user) calls the MSP or OpenAPI certificate-management endpoints, which fail to check administrative authorization. They delete or replace the controller's TLS certificate/private key, breaking HTTPS management access for administrators or substituting an attacker-controlled certificate to position for interception of management sessions. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Improper access control in TP-Link Omada Controller's MSP and OpenAPI certificate/private-key management APIs allows an authenticated user to perform privileged certificate operations - uploading or deleting the controller's TLS certificate or private key - which can disrupt secure management access to the controller. The description states a low-privileged authenticated account is sufficient, although the supplied CVSS 4.0 vector (7.5) specifies PR:H; an independent assessment captures the lower-privilege reading as CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H, i.e. network-reachable, no user interaction, no confidentiality impact, and high integrity and availability impact. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis (no KEV listing and no EPSS score were provided), so exploitation requires a valid controller account plus network reachability to the affected MSP or OpenAPI endpoints.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor fix by upgrading to the patched Omada Controller build referenced in TP-Link's advisory (support document 136188: https://support.omadanetworks.com/us/document/136188/) and on the software download page (https://support.omadanetworks.com/en/download/software/omada-controller/); verify the fixed build in those vendor materials before upgrading, since the provided data does not state an exact patched version number, and do not rely on a version number not listed by the vendor. If an immediate upgrade is not possible, compensate by blocking network access to the Omada Controller management plane from untrusted networks - restrict the MSP/OpenAPI and controller management ports to a hardened administrative VLAN or VPN with firewall allow-lists - and, where the features are unused, disable the MSP and OpenAPI interfaces entirely; the trade-off is loss of MSP multi-tenant management and API-driven automation. Also audit controller accounts and remove or disable low-privileged accounts that do not strictly need management-plane access, and rotate/re-issue the controller TLS certificate and private key after remediation if a certificate upload or deletion is suspected, since the trade-off of rotation is brief management-plane downtime and client re-trust. Monitor for unexpected certificate or key changes in the controller's logs as a detection measure; note that none of these controls fully substitutes for the vendor patch, which remains the primary fix. Patch status reported here is 'Patch available per vendor advisory' only insofar as the referenced vendor documentation and download locations describe the corrected software; the specific patched version was not independently confirmed from the supplied data.

Affected VersionsENISA

Omada Software Controller 0 <6.3.0.45

Affected Packages

euvd omada_software_controller fix: 6.3.0.45

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause class is CWE-284 (Improper Access Control): the MSP and OpenAPI certificate/private-key management API endpoints on Omada Controller do not enforce an administrative authorization check before executing privileged certificate operations, so a caller who is merely authenticated - potentially with a low-privileged account - can reach functionality reserved for administrators. Note the supplied CVSS 4.0 vector asserts PR:H, while the description and our independent assessment indicate the privilege requirement is effectively lower (PR:L); the discrepancy is material for triage because it changes the population of accounts that can abuse the flaw. The affected surface is the management plane, specifically the certificate lifecycle functions that handle the controller's TLS server certificate and its private key; replacing or deleting those artifacts breaks the trust anchor used for HTTPS management sessions and can lock out administrators, while an attacker-supplied certificate combined with private-key deletion/replacement could enable impersonation or man-in-the-middle of management traffic. No CPE strings were supplied, so exact build-level product mapping must be taken from the referenced vendor material. The 'Authentication Bypass' tag reflects the missing authorization gate rather than an unauthenticated bypass of credentials.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (f23511db-6c3e-4e32-a477-6aa17d310630) PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Network-reachable API abusable by a low-privileged authenticated user (PR:L per description, not PR:H); certificate upload/replace gives I:H and key deletion disrupting management gives A:H; no direct data disclosure so C:N.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (f23511db-6c3e-4e32-a477-6aa17d310630).

CVSS VectorVendor: f23511db-6c3e-4e32-a477-6aa17d310630

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 15, 2026 - 02:16 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 14, 2026 - 23:17 cve.org
HIGH 7.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Omada Controller's MSP and OpenAPI certificate/private-key management APIs do not properly enforce administrative authorization, allowing an authenticated user to perform privileged certificate management operations.

Successful exploitation may allow a low-privileged authenticated user to upload or delete the controller's TLS certificate or private key, potentially disrupting secure management access.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

TP-Link Omada Controller, used to manage the organization’s network infrastructure, has a high-severity access-control weakness in its MSP and OpenAPI certificate management interfaces that could allow an authenticated low-privileged user to disrupt secure administrative access. A successful attack could interrupt management connectivity, delay incident response, and force costly certificate recovery across affected controller deployments. With no vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis and no public exploit identified, leadership should prioritize exposure reduction, account governance, and monitoring while awaiting a fix.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified; restrict MSP/OpenAPI endpoints to trusted networks, enforce least privilege and MFA for controller accounts, disable unused API services, monitor and back up TLS certificates/private keys for unauthorized changes.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 88% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular SMB/prosumer TP-Link network management controller, moderate enterprise footprint
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

38
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy