Skip to main content

Denuvo Anti-Tamper CVE-2026-105051

| EUVDEUVD-2026-91848 LOW
Use of Less Trusted Source (CWE-348)
2026-10-02 mitre GHSA-pcmv-37x3-p3jg
1.9
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: mitre
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain local admin, load kernel-level hypervisor
  2. Exploit
    Intercept CPUID to spoof hypervisor absence
  3. Impact
    Bypass Denuvo anti-tamper presence check

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication IP-independent access control
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already have local administrative/kernel-level control of the machine in order to load a hypervisor driver (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD, or hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel) that intercepts the CPUID instruction and spoofs hypervisor-absence results back to Denuvo's detection logic. Limiting factors: no remote vector (AV:L), high privileges required (PR:H - kernel driver loading), and high attack complexity (AC:H, platform-specific AMD/Intel tooling). In practice the 'attacker' is the operator of the host defeating DRM on their own system, so there is no third-party victim or escalation beyond the anti-tamper check itself.

Impact

This is a genuinely low-priority issue, and the signals are consistent in pointing that way. The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N, base 1.9) describes a local attack requiring high privileges and high complexity, with no confidentiality or availability impact and only low integrity impact - the 'integrity' being Denuvo's own hypervisor-presence check, not the host OS. No EPSS score was supplied in the input and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, so there is no confirmed active exploitation. The GitHub reference ('hypervisor-crack-audit') strongly suggests public analysis/exploit code exists, but no formal POC flag was provided, so this is inferred rather than confirmed. Critically, CWE-348 (reliance on a less-trusted source) and the mechanism make clear this is a DRM/anti-tamper circumvention performed by the operator of their own machine - not a vector for an external attacker to compromise a victim. There is no SSVC decision data in the input. Net: this is a low-CVSS, low-real-risk DRM bypass of interest to game publishers and Denuvo/Irdeto, not an enterprise security priority.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A user with local administrative/kernel privileges on their own system loads a custom hypervisor (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD, or hyperkd.sys/hyperhv.dll on Intel) that intercepts the CPUID instruction to spoof its results, hiding the hypervisor from Denuvo's presence check. This lets a Denuvo-protected game run under virtualization or instrumentation the anti-tamper is designed to block. Public audit/exploit code appears to be referenced via the linked GitHub repository, though no formal POC flag was provided in the input.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 02, 2026

Denuvo Anti-Tamper (through 2026-03-04) can be bypassed by locally authenticated administrators with kernel-level privileges who load a hypervisor driver that intercepts CPUID instructions and spoofs hypervisor-absence results, defeating the anti-tamper check on AMD (SimpleSvm.sys) and Intel (hyperkd.sys, hyperhv.dll) platforms. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 1.9 (AV:L/AC:H/PR:H) and only affects the integrity of the DRM check on the attacker's own system, with no third-party victim or escalation. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Irdeto could address CWE-348 by using a more trusted source for hypervisor detection, such as hardware-based attestation (e.g., TPM or Intel/AMD secure enclaves) instead of relying solely on CPUID results. As a compensating control, organizations should restrict the ability to load kernel-mode drivers to fully trusted administrators, though this does not prevent a machine owner from bypassing DRM on their own system - the trade-off is that it does not mitigate the self-bypass scenario and may hinder legitimate driver installations. For end users, the issue only affects the integrity of the DRM check and poses no risk to third parties, so no urgent action is required. Monitor the referenced sources for any future patch from Irdeto.

Affected VersionsENISA

Denuvo Anti-Tamper 0 ≤2026-03-04

Affected Packages

euvd denuvo_anti_tamper no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Denuvo Anti-Tamper is a DRM and anti-tamper product by Irdeto that uses hypervisor presence checks to detect virtualized or instrumented environments. The vulnerability (CWE-348: Use of Less Trusted Source) arises because the check relies on the CPUID instruction, which can be intercepted and spoofed by a malicious hypervisor driver loaded with kernel privileges. On AMD systems, the attacker loads SimpleSvm.sys to intercept CPUID; on Intel systems, hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll are used. This allows the attacker to present a hypervisor-absent state to Denuvo, bypassing the anti-tamper mechanism. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:irdeto:denuvo_anti-tamper:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* indicates all versions through 2026-03-04 are affected. References include a Habr article (https://habr.com/en/articles/1021894/) and a GitHub repository (https://github.com/RD945/hypervisor-crack-audit) that appear to document the technique.

Know when Denuvo Anti Tamper gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (mitre) PRIMARY 1.9 LOW
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 1.9 LOW

Local, high-privilege kernel driver and CPU-specific CPUID interception justify AV:L/PR:H/AC:H; only the anti-tamper check's integrity is subverted (I:L), with no C or A impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).

CVSS VectorVendor: mitre

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 100% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular anti-tamper DRM embedded in many AAA PC games, consumer-only footprint
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Low
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

10
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +10
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy