Skip to main content

B Blocks CVE-2026-104400

| EUVDEUVD-2026-92287 MEDIUM
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-10-05 Patchstack GHSA-fc88-8573-9hfx
6.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Patchstack
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege WordPress account
  2. Delivery
    Inject script into B Blocks field
  3. Exploit
    Payload stored unsanitized
  4. Execution
    Admin views affected page
  5. Persist
    Script executes in admin browser
  6. Impact
    Session/account actions hijacked

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to hold an authenticated WordPress account with sufficient capability to create or edit content using the B Blocks plugin (consistent with PR:L), and the injected stored payload only triggers when another user - typically an administrator or editor - subsequently views the affected block content (UI:R). Limiting factors: the attacker cannot exploit this unauthenticated; a posting-capable role is needed; a privileged victim must visit the page for the changed-scope impact to materialize; and only sites running B Blocks at or below version 2.1.8 are affected. This is not exploitable against a default WordPress install lacking the plugin.

Impact

This is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) stored cross-site scripting flaw in the bPlugins B Blocks WordPress plugin (through 2.1.8), reported by Patchstack. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L) indicates network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation but requires authentication (PR:L - a low-privilege authenticated user such as a contributor/author) and victim user interaction (UI:R), with a changed scope reflecting that injected script executes in another user's browser context. No EPSS score, KEV listing, or public POC was provided in the input, so exploitation likelihood signals are absent rather than elevated. Exploitation status: no public exploit identified at time of analysis. This profile is a routine, patch-on-cycle WordPress plugin XSS rather than an emergency: the authentication and user-interaction requirements meaningfully constrain real-world risk, and the impact metrics are all 'Low'. The dual requirement of an attacker holding a posting-capable account AND a privileged victim viewing the malicious content is the key limiting factor. Note no EPSS/KEV/POC data was supplied - absence here is not evidence of safety, only of unconfirmed exploitation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An authenticated low-privilege user (e.g., a contributor) with access to the B Blocks editor injects a malicious script payload into a block field that is not properly sanitized. When an administrator or another user later views the post or page containing the stored payload, the script executes in their browser session, potentially performing actions as that privileged user. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 05, 2026

Stored cross-site scripting in the bPlugins B Blocks WordPress plugin (all versions through 2.1.8) lets an authenticated user with posting privileges inject persistent JavaScript that executes in the browser of any privileged user who subsequently views the crafted block content. Rated CVSS 6.5 (medium), exploitation requires a low-privileged WordPress account and victim interaction, but it can lead to session theft, defacement, or administrative actions performed under the victim's identity. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch was identified in the available data at time of analysis; administrators should check the Patchstack advisory and the WordPress plugin repository for a version later than 2.1.8 and upgrade immediately when one becomes available. In the absence of a fixed version, consider disabling the B Blocks plugin if it is not essential, which eliminates the risk entirely but removes its block functionality. Restrict the ability to create or edit content to trusted users only, since the attacker must hold a posting-capable role; audit and remove unnecessary contributor or author accounts. Apply a web application firewall (WAF) or a WordPress security plugin with XSS filtering to block malicious payloads, though this is a compensating control and may not catch all stored XSS variants. Because the payload only executes when a privileged user views the affected content, encourage administrators to avoid reviewing untrusted block content directly and to use a separate browser or session for such moderation tasks. Monitor for unusual block content or unexpected administrative actions.

Affected VersionsENISA

B Blocks 0 ≤2.1.8

Affected Packages

euvd b_blocks no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a CWE-79 improper neutralization of input during web page generation (stored cross-site scripting) in the bPlugins B Blocks plugin for WordPress, which provides custom Gutenberg blocks. The plugin fails to sanitize or escape user-controlled block content before storing it in the WordPress database and later rendering it in the admin or front-end interface. With a CVSS vector of AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L, the attack is network-accessible, requires low privileges and user interaction, and has a scope change indicating the injected script can affect resources beyond the vulnerable component, such as the entire WordPress session. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:bplugins:b_blocks:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* confirms the affected component is the B Blocks plugin itself, not WordPress core. Successful exploitation typically requires an attacker to create or edit a post, page, or reusable block containing the malicious payload.

Know when B Blocks gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Patchstack) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Authenticated content-contributor access gives PR:L, stored payload needs a victim to view it (UI:R), and script executing in the victim's browser context yields S:C with Low C/I/A.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Patchstack).

CVSS VectorVendor: Patchstack

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in bPlugins B Blocks b-blocks allows Stored XSS.This issue affects B Blocks: from n/a through 2.1.8.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 95% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
Niche Gutenberg blocks plugin, modest WordPress install base
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy