Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft HTTP request with comment sequence
-
DeliveryremoveComments mishandles trailing character
-
ExploitWAF ruleset fails to match payload
-
ExecutionMalicious input reaches backend application
-
ImpactExploit downstream injection flaw
Vulnerability Assessment
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that the target runs a ModSecurity deployment whose ruleset applies the |
| Impact | Nearly all standard risk signals are MISSING from the input: CVSS score and vector are N/A, and no EPSS, KEV, POC, or SSVC data was provided - so exploitation probability, active-exploitation status, and automatability cannot be quantified from the data at hand. The vulnerability class itself is a security-control bypass rather than a direct compromise: per the description, the |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker sends an HTTP request containing a payload (e.g., SQL injection or XSS) wrapped so that a mishandled character follows a comment terminator; the removeComments transformation normalizes the value incorrectly, so the WAF ruleset inspects a benign-looking string while the backend receives the live payload. This smuggles the malicious input past the protection layer, enabling exploitation of a downstream injection flaw. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the referenced GHSA advisory content was not included in the input. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026
ModSecurity's t:removeComments transformation can be bypassed because it mishandles the character following a comment terminator, letting crafted input evade rules that rely on this normalization step. The issue affects ModSecurity deployments whose rulesets invoke t:removeComments, such as configurations derived from the OWASP Core Rule Set, with real impact only when an exploitable downstream sink (for example SQL injection, XSS, or command injection) was otherwise blocked by the bypassed rule. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; the assessed vector is CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N, indicating low integrity impact with no confidentiality or availability impact.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Until a patch is available, remove or disable the t:removeComments transformation action from SecRule actions and chains that are not strictly required; this is the most direct workaround, but it can alter rule matching behavior, may increase false positives or negatives, and should be tested in staging before production rollout. For rules that must retain removeComments, add independent normalization or downstream input validation, because the bypass only matters when ModSecurity is the control relied on to block SQL injection, XSS, or command injection. Monitor GHSA-qrch-pjfr-9g47 and Ubuntu security notices for an updated ModSecurity package, and verify whether any ruleset invokes t:removeComments before assuming the deployment is unaffected.
Affected ProductsAI
ModSecurity deployments that use the t:removeComments transformation action in their rules or chains are affected, including common configurations derived from the OWASP Core Rule Set. No CPE strings or version ranges are present in the provided data, and the CVE record does not supply an affected-version list; Ubuntu is listed as the reporting vendor, suggesting Ubuntu-packaged ModSecurity may be relevant, but exact Ubuntu releases and package versions are not specified. The identifying advisory is GHSA-qrch-pjfr-9g47.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is in the ModSecurity transformation action t:removeComments, which strips comments from input during rule processing. It mishandles the character after a comment terminator, producing a normalized string that can differ from the input rules are intended to inspect, thereby allowing rules and chains that use this transformation to be bypassed. The root cause is an input-neutralization/transform error; no CWE is provided in the CVE data. Affected technology is ModSecurity itself and WAF rulesets such as the OWASP Core Rule Set that apply t:removeComments. The assessed vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N indicates network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation with no privileges or user interaction required, unchanged scope, and only low integrity impact; the source CVE record supplied no CVSS vector, and authentication requirements were not confirmed from the available CVE data.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
Delivered via a crafted HTTP request with no authentication and low complexity (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); direct impact is bypass of an input-filtering control (I:L), with no inherent confidentiality or availability loss.
Estimated by vuln.today — no official severity rating has been published for this CVE yet.
DescriptionCVE.org
[GHSA-qrch-pjfr-9g47: t:removeComments mishandles the character after a comment terminator, bypassing rules]
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
CVE.org
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB