Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCompromise Chrome renderer process
-
DeliveryServe crafted HTML page
-
ExploitAbuse missing authorization in Payments
-
ExecutionBypass web origin policy
-
ImpactManipulate cross-origin payment actions
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that the attacker has ALREADY compromised the Chrome renderer process - this is the explicit precondition stated in the advisory and is the primary factor limiting real-world risk, since it presupposes a prior successful exploit against the browser. Given a compromised renderer, the attacker then delivers a crafted HTML page that triggers the missing authorization check in the Payments component to bypass web origin policy. Affected builds are Google Chrome desktop prior to 154.0.8037.92; user interaction (UI:R, loading/visiting the crafted page) is also required. No confidentiality or availability impact applies - only integrity (cross-origin action manipulation). The bug is not automatable per CISA SSVC and has no observed exploitation. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely low-priority issue despite the 6.5 CVSS base score, and the signals are consistent rather than conflicting. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N) scores it as network-reachable with high integrity impact, but the description imposes a severe gating precondition the base vector understates: the attacker must have ALREADY compromised the Chrome renderer process before this bug does anything. That makes it a secondary/sandbox-relevant weakness - a step in a longer chain, not a standalone entry point - which is exactly why Chromium itself rated the security severity 'Low'. CISA's SSVC framework corroborates low urgency: Exploitation=none (no observed activity), Automatable=no, Technical Impact=partial. No EPSS score was supplied, there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code was identified, so this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The one nuance worth flagging: the vendor vector's PR:N/AC:L arguably overstates reachability because a compromised renderer is a substantial prerequisite - I assess higher complexity below. Bottom line: real but low-priority, addressed by simply staying current on Chrome auto-updates. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker first achieves code execution in Chrome's renderer process (e.g. via a separate rendering-engine exploit) and then serves a crafted HTML page that abuses the Payments component's missing authorization check to act across a web origin it should not be able to reach, bypassing same-origin/web-origin policy. The integrity impact (I:H) reflects the ability to forge or manipulate payment-related actions in another origin's context. No public proof-of-concept or active exploitation is known. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 30, 2026
Missing authorization checks in Google Chrome's Payments component (desktop builds prior to 154.0.8037.92) let a remote attacker who has already compromised the browser's renderer process use a crafted HTML page to bypass web origin policy and perform cross-origin payment-related actions. The attacker is a remote, unauthenticated party per the CVSS vector (PR:N), but exploitation carries two hard preconditions: the renderer must first be compromised, and the victim must interact with the crafted page (UI:R). There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, CISA's SSVC assessment records no exploitation and no automatable path, and only integrity is impacted (C:N/I:H/A:N), so despite the 6.5 base score this is a genuinely low-priority issue whose main risk driver is the prior renderer compromise rather than the origin-policy bypass itself.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: update Google Chrome to version 154.0.8037.92 or later by applying the current Stable channel update (advisory: https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/09/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_01807488085.html) and then fully restarting the browser, since Chrome only swaps in the new binary after all processes have exited - verify the applied build at chrome://version. In managed fleets, force the upgrade through Google Update policies or the Admin console / Chrome Browser Cloud Management rather than relying on user-initiated updates, and track the Chromium issue at https://issues.chromium.org/issues/477726837 for any follow-up. Because exploitation requires an already-compromised renderer, the highest-value compensating control is reducing the chance of that precondition being met: keep Site Isolation and the renderer sandbox enabled, maintain a tight patch cadence for V8/Blink remote code execution fixes, and avoid Extended Stable channels that lag on those fixes. Organizations that do not use Chrome's payments surface can additionally reduce exposure by disabling autofill of payment data via the AutofillCreditCardEnabled and AutofillAddressEnabled enterprise policies, with the trade-off that users lose saved-card and address autofill convenience; this does not eliminate the vulnerable code path but removes the data the bypass would act on. No network-level workaround or port blocking is applicable, and there is no indication that a version older than 154.0.8037.92 can be made safe by configuration alone, so patching remains the only complete fix.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-862, Missing Authorization, in Chrome's Payments component - the autofill/payment-instrument surface that stores and brokers payment data across origins. Chrome's architecture treats the renderer process as untrusted and relies on browser-process-side (privileged) authorization checks over Mojo IPC to enforce the same-origin policy between a page and payment data or payment-related actions. This flaw means that an authorization check on that privileged side is absent or incomplete, so a renderer that has already been subverted can invoke a Payments operation on behalf of a different origin and thereby defeat web origin policy. It is worth stressing that the bypass is not itself a sandbox escape: it is a policy-enforcement defect that only becomes reachable once a separate renderer exploit has succeeded, which is why the independent assessment raises attack complexity to AC:H relative to the vendor CVSS (AC:L) and why Chromium rates the issue Low severity. Only the integrity dimension is affected - an attacker can manipulate cross-origin payment-related state but gains no read access to secrets and cannot degrade availability.
Know when Chrome gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
AC:H because exploitation requires a pre-compromised renderer process rather than default conditions; UI:R for loading the crafted page; impact limited to integrity (origin-policy bypass), so C:N/A:N.
Primary rating from Vendor (Chrome).
CVSS VectorVendor: Chrome
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
Missing authorization in Payments in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.92 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Use-after-free vulnerability in the DisplayObject class in the ActionScript 3 (AS3) implementation in Adobe Flash Player
V8 in Google Chrome prior to 54.0.2840.90 for Linux, and 54.0.2840.85 for Android, and 54.0.2840.87 for Windows and Mac
Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 59.0.3071.86 for Linux, Windows, and Mac, and 59.0.3071.92 for Android, a
The Array.prototype.concat implementation in builtins.cc in Google V8, as used in Google Chrome before 49.0.2623.108, do
Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.12 and 17.x before 17.0.2, Thunderbird before 17.0.2, Thunderb
Incorrect handling of complex species in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 57.0.2987.98 for Linux, Windows, and Mac and 57.0.
The Chrome Object Wrapper (COW) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 16.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.8, Thunderbi
An issue was discovered in the Cisco WebEx Extension before 1.0.7 on Google Chrome, the ActiveTouch General Plugin Conta
The XrayWrapper implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 35.0 and SeaMonkey before 2.32 does not properly interact with
The Chrome Object Wrapper (COW) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.2, Thunderbi
The Web IDL implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 28.0, Firefox ESR 24.x before 24.4, Thunderbird before 24.4, and Se
Use-after-free vulnerability in the BitmapData class in the ActionScript 3 (AS3) implementation in Adobe Flash Player 13
EUVD-2026-89400
GHSA-gpgp-6mmr-5hc6
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB