Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft URL with malicious query parameter
-
DeliveryLure victim to click link
-
ExploitPayload reflected into iframe srcdoc
-
ExecutionScript executes in victim browser
-
ImpactSession/data compromise in site context
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation is strictly gated: a site administrator must have previously saved a form whose description embeds a {query_var} Smart Tag inside an iframe srcdoc attribute, AND must have enabled the 'Show Description' option on a public-facing page. Only then can an unauthenticated attacker supply a malicious value via the attacker-controlled query-string parameter (e.g. 'x') referenced by that Smart Tag. Additional limiting factors: the attack is reflected, so it requires user interaction (victim must click a crafted link), and impact is confined to script execution in the victim's browser context (C:L/I:L, no availability impact). These non-default configuration requirements plus the UI:R/AC:H profile substantially narrow real-world exploitability despite the network-facing, unauthenticated entry point. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely low-priority issue despite being a flaw in an extremely popular plugin. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 4.7 (Medium), and the vector itself tells the real story: AV:N but AC:H, PR:N, UI:R, with only Low confidentiality and integrity impact (C:L/I:L) and no availability impact. The high attack complexity (AC:H) is driven by stacked preconditions - exploitation only works if an administrator has already saved a form whose description embeds a {query_var} Smart Tag inside an iframe srcdoc attribute AND enabled 'Show Description' on a public page - which is a non-default, atypical configuration. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. The vulnerability is NOT in CISA KEV and no public exploit code was referenced (only Wordfence's advisory and WordPress trac source/patch links), so this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The signals are internally consistent rather than conflicting: a network-reachable but hard-to-trigger, user-interaction-dependent reflected XSS with limited impact. Priority should be low-to-moderate - patch during routine maintenance rather than emergency response - though the plugin's massive install base means it is worth not ignoring. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | On a site where an admin has published a form containing a {query_var} Smart Tag inside an iframe srcdoc with 'Show Description' enabled, an attacker crafts a URL with a malicious value in the attacker-chosen query parameter (e.g. 'x') referenced by that Smart Tag. The attacker emails or posts the link, and when a victim clicks it the unsanitized value is reflected into the iframe srcdoc and executes arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session. No public proof-of-concept was referenced, and success depends on both the pre-existing form configuration and tricking the victim into clicking (AV:N but AC:H/UI:R). |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 10, 2026
Reflected cross-site scripting in WPForms Lite through 2.0.2.1 allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary script in a victim's browser if the site administrator previously saved a form whose description embeds a {query_var} Smart Tag inside an iframe srcdoc attribute and enabled Show Description on a public-facing page. The attacker must trick a victim into clicking a crafted link containing a malicious value for the referenced query parameter, and the flaw is rated CVSS 4.7 with high attack complexity and required user interaction. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis and CISA KEV does not list this CVE.
RemediationAI
Upstream fix available (changeset/commit); released patched version not independently confirmed. Apply the upstream fix referenced by changeset 3730630 and update WPForms Lite to the latest release after 2.0.2.1 once a vendor-packaged version is available; there is no exact patched release version in the provided data. If immediate patching is not possible, disable the Show Description option on public-facing forms and remove any {query_var} Smart Tags embedded inside iframe srcdoc attributes in saved form descriptions; this eliminates the vulnerable rendering path but may remove intended dynamic form descriptions. Additionally, sanitize or reject query-string parameters containing HTML/script markup at the web server or WAF layer, accepting possible false positives, and review the Wordfence advisory at https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/39e1abcf-c3b6-4c53-a3dc-8a5741f24cca?source=cve plus the source references at https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wpforms-lite/tags/2.0.2.1/src/SmartTags/SmartTags.php#L673 and https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wpforms-lite/tags/2.0.2.1/src/SmartTags/SmartTag/QueryVar.php#L34 for patch guidance.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The issue is a CWE-79 improper neutralization of input during web page generation, specifically reflected XSS, in the WordPress plugin WPForms Lite. The plugin's SmartTags subsystem exposes a {query_var} Smart Tag that reads a URL query parameter chosen by the form author; when that Smart Tag is placed inside an iframe srcdoc attribute in a saved form description, the value can be reflected into HTML without adequate sanitization or output escaping. Source references point to SmartTags.php line 673, SmartTag/QueryVar.php line 34, and Frontend/Classic.php line 323 in the 2.0.2.1 tag; changeset 3730630 appears to address the vulnerable path. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N reflects network reachability, unauthenticated entry, high attack complexity due to the required site configuration, required victim interaction, changed scope, and limited confidentiality and integrity impact with no availability impact. The CPE identifies the affected product line as smub's WPForms AI Form Builder for WordPress package.
Know when Wordpress Plugin gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Unauthenticated/network-reachable (PR:N/AV:N) but AC:H for the required pre-saved iframe srcdoc Smart Tag configuration, UI:R for the click, S:C as script escapes into the rendered page, C:L/I:L/A:N for reflected XSS.
Primary rating from Vendor (Wordfence).
CVSS VectorVendor: Wordfence
DescriptionCVE.org
The WPForms - AI Form Builder for WordPress - Contact Forms, Payment Forms, Survey Form, Quiz & More plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the 'attacker-chosen key referenced by the smart tag (e.g. "x")' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.2.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Exploitation requires that a site administrator has previously saved a form whose description embeds a {query_var} Smart Tag inside an iframe srcdoc attribute and has enabled Show Description on a public-facing page.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
More in Wordpress Plugin
View allThe Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1
The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil
Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote
The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner
The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut
The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via
The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based
SQL injection in the NotificationX WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 2.8.2) allows unauthenticated remote a
The POST SMTP Mailer - Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress i
The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin - for Online Courses and Education plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to union base
The Email Subscribers by Icegram Express plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘hash’ parameter in
Remote code execution in the WP Query Console WordPress plugin (versions up to and including 1.0) by Ajit Bohra allows u
EUVD-2026-96278
GHSA-9hgh-pr23-77c9
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB